Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
188,932 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Mixing Regularization for Average-Reward Q-Learning and Q-Planning

Abstract

The average-reward setting for reinforcement learning is challenging because its Bellman operator is known to contract in span only when the underlying Markov chain is mixing. Whereas existing work typically assumes a contraction property, e.g., through environment mixing, we consider the setting where we are given a reward-agnostic m-step mixing policy, and we control the contraction and exploration properties of the learned policy by regularizing toward the mixing policy. We provide finite-time analysis of Q-learning algorithms that can be instantiated with multiple choices of regularization, with guarantees measured with respect to the regularized fixed point. Our framework exposes novel regularizer-dependent objects that control contraction, exploration, and operator bias. In the one-step setting, our rates match the best known rates for Q-iteration and synchronous Q-learning, and for m-step mixing we derive new rates. We also study Q-planning variants, and show that planning acts as time-localized learning, where the planning horizon H trades off the bias from the boundary value against the sample complexity. Finally, we present numerical studies validating the analysis: (i) knowledge of a strong mixing policy improves convergence and exploration, and its advantage increases with bottleneck severity and, (ii) our theory predicts the convergence and bias rankings of regularizers from the α-divergence family.

Related

  1. Non-asymptotic Convergence of Average-reward Q-learning with Options
    Kintan Saha, Ahana Deb, Anders Jonsson +1
    HALPreprintLicence not statedStatisticsHAL
  2. Entropy-Regularized Mean-Field Games with Average-Reward Criterion: Span-Seminorm Contractions and Model-Free Learning
    Gunes Akbas, Naci Saldi, Berkay Anahtarci +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Distributionally Robust Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning: Finite-Sample Guarantees under Weak Communication
    Chenyu Lu, Zijun Chen, Nian Si
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  4. Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning for Multichain MDPs: A Hierarchical Decomposition Approach
    Huizhen Yu, Isaiah Heidt
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Sharp Convergence and Sample Complexity of Policy Mirror Descent for Average-Reward MDPs
    Enes Arda, Atilla Eryilmaz
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{roger2026mixing,
  title = {{Mixing Regularization for Average-Reward $Q$-Learning and $Q$-Planning}},
  author = {Julien Roger and Sam Bodmer and Jian Qian and Benjamin Riviere},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.14988},
  eprint = {2610.14988},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14988},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Mixing Regularization for Average-Reward Q-Learning and Q-Planning
AU  - Julien Roger
AU  - Sam Bodmer
AU  - Jian Qian
AU  - Benjamin Riviere
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.14988
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14988
AB  - The average-reward setting for reinforcement learning is challenging because its Bellman operator is known to contract in span only when the underlying Markov chain is mixing. Whereas existing work typically assumes a contraction property, e.g., through environment mixing, we consider the setting where we are given a reward-agnostic m-step mixing policy, and we control the contraction and exploration properties of the learned policy by regularizing toward the mixing policy. We provide finite-time analysis of Q-learning algorithms that can be instantiated with multiple choices of regularization, with guarantees measured with respect to the regularized fixed point. Our framework exposes novel regularizer-dependent objects that control contraction, exploration, and operator bias. In the one-step setting, our rates match the best known rates for Q-iteration and synchronous Q-learning, and for m-step mixing we derive new rates. We also study Q-planning variants, and show that planning acts as time-localized learning, where the planning horizon H trades off the bias from the boundary value against the sample complexity. Finally, we present numerical studies validating the analysis: (i) knowledge of a strong mixing policy improves convergence and exploration, and its advantage increases with bottleneck severity and, (ii) our theory predicts the convergence and bias rankings of regularizers from the α-divergence family.
ER  -