Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sharp Convergence and Sample Complexity of Policy Mirror Descent for Average-Reward MDPs

Abstract

Policy mirror descent (PMD) has a mature finite-time theory in discounted Markov decision processes (MDPs), but less is known in the average-reward setting, a more natural objective for many control applications. We give a finite-time, finite-sample analysis of PMD in ergodic average-reward MDPs built around a single master recursion that governs convergence for any critic, without external regularization. Its specializations yield linear rates for exact, inexact-tabular, and linear function approximation (LFA) updates, with a superlinear regime for exact PMD. We complement these convergence results with end-to-end sample complexities of order tmix3/ε2 in both tabular (|S||A|-dependent) and LFA (d-dependent) settings. Our LFA sample complexity sharpens the prior best tmix5 mixing dependence to tmix3, and matching information-theoretic lower bounds establish that the critic's tmix3/ε2 sample complexity is unimprovable in both settings.

Related

  1. Tight Sample Complexity Bounds for Entropic Best Policy Identification
    Amer Essakine, Claire Vernade
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Randomized average block coordinate descent method with heavy-ball momentum for tensor least squares problem under the t-product
    Li-Lin Ji, Ni-Hong Ke, Jun-Feng Yin
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  3. Non-asymptotic Convergence of Average-reward Q-learning with Options
    Kintan Saha, Ahana Deb, Anders Jonsson +1
    HALPreprintLicence not statedStatisticsHAL
  4. Does Policy Mirror Descent Converge in Policy with Non-Decomposable Mirror Maps? A Counterexample
    Wenye Li, Ke Wei
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. PL conditions do not guarantee convergence of gradient descent-ascent dynamics
    Jean-Christophe Mourrat
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHAL
BibTeX
@misc{arda2026sharp,
  title = {{Sharp Convergence and Sample Complexity of Policy Mirror Descent for Average-Reward MDPs}},
  author = {Enes Arda and Atilla Eryilmaz},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.04117},
  eprint = {2610.04117},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04117},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sharp Convergence and Sample Complexity of Policy Mirror Descent for Average-Reward MDPs
AU  - Enes Arda
AU  - Atilla Eryilmaz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.04117
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04117
AB  - Policy mirror descent (PMD) has a mature finite-time theory in discounted Markov decision processes (MDPs), but less is known in the average-reward setting, a more natural objective for many control applications. We give a finite-time, finite-sample analysis of PMD in ergodic average-reward MDPs built around a single master recursion that governs convergence for any critic, without external regularization. Its specializations yield linear rates for exact, inexact-tabular, and linear function approximation (LFA) updates, with a superlinear regime for exact PMD. We complement these convergence results with end-to-end sample complexities of order t_mix^3/ε^2 in both tabular (|S||A|-dependent) and LFA (d-dependent) settings. Our LFA sample complexity sharpens the prior best t_mix^5 mixing dependence to t_mix^3, and matching information-theoretic lower bounds establish that the critic's t_mix^3/ε^2 sample complexity is unimprovable in both settings.
ER  -