Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Intermittent quarantine suppresses epidemic spreading beyond simple contact reduction

Abstract

Social interactions are shaped by networks that can be highly heterogeneous, with some individuals potentially interacting with many others. However, physical and temporal constraints limit the number of simultaneous interactions, making social contacts inherently intermittent. Here, we investigate how intermittency affects epidemic spreading on complex networks considering two distinct mechanisms: intermittency of connections (links) and individuals themselves (nodes), with periods of activity and inactivity governed by renewal processes with broadly distributed inter-event times. Combining mechanistic theoretical approaches with stochastic simulations, we show that these two forms of intermittency have fundamentally different effects on epidemic spreading. Link intermittency largely preserves the mechanisms responsible for sustaining transmission, and epidemic behavior can be largely explained by the average reduction in contact opportunities. Contrastingly, node intermittency is substantially more effective at containing spreading because the simultaneous interruption of all contacts suppresses transmission while recovery continues independently. The non-Markovian nature of node intermittency plays a key role: shorter and less heterogeneous inter-event times increase epidemic thresholds and enhance epidemic containment. Our results highlight how the temporal organization of individual activity, beyond the average reduction in contacts, can substantially alter epidemic spreading and may help inform interventions that exploit intermittency in social and biological contact networks.

Related

  1. Fast-variable reduction to complex contagion unifies epidemic models
    Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, Péter L. Simon, István Z. Kiss
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Fundamental limits to identifying node and tie memory in temporal networks: marginal artefacts and spreading dynamics
    Michele Tizzani
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  3. Universal mapping of drop impact spreading from wetting to Leidenfrost regimes
    Shushan Hu, Nan Hu, Zirui Li +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  4. Probing Operator Spreading with Local Quantum Fluctuations
    Bertúlio de Lima Bernardo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Quantum information spreading via higher-order operator correlators
    M Süzen
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{moraes2026intermittent,
  title = {{Intermittent quarantine suppresses epidemic spreading beyond simple contact reduction}},
  author = {Juliane T. Moraes and Silvio C. Ferreira},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.00429},
  eprint = {2610.00429},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00429},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Intermittent quarantine suppresses epidemic spreading beyond simple contact reduction
AU  - Juliane T. Moraes
AU  - Silvio C. Ferreira
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.00429
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00429
AB  - Social interactions are shaped by networks that can be highly heterogeneous, with some individuals potentially interacting with many others. However, physical and temporal constraints limit the number of simultaneous interactions, making social contacts inherently intermittent. Here, we investigate how intermittency affects epidemic spreading on complex networks considering two distinct mechanisms: intermittency of connections (links) and individuals themselves (nodes), with periods of activity and inactivity governed by renewal processes with broadly distributed inter-event times. Combining mechanistic theoretical approaches with stochastic simulations, we show that these two forms of intermittency have fundamentally different effects on epidemic spreading. Link intermittency largely preserves the mechanisms responsible for sustaining transmission, and epidemic behavior can be largely explained by the average reduction in contact opportunities. Contrastingly, node intermittency is substantially more effective at containing spreading because the simultaneous interruption of all contacts suppresses transmission while recovery continues independently. The non-Markovian nature of node intermittency plays a key role: shorter and less heterogeneous inter-event times increase epidemic thresholds and enhance epidemic containment. Our results highlight how the temporal organization of individual activity, beyond the average reduction in contacts, can substantially alter epidemic spreading and may help inform interventions that exploit intermittency in social and biological contact networks.
ER  -