Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Iterative Refinement for Structural Optimization of De Novo Protein Sequences

  1. 1University of Texas at Dallas

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an iterative refinement procedure that substitutes individual amino acid residues in a predicted protein sequence to minimize structural error; substitutions are guided by a weighted composite score of global evaluation metrics including the TM-score, GDT-TS, and RMSD. Starting from an initial sequence prediction produced by a structure-aware graph neural network (GNN) [5], the refinement procedure evaluates candidate amino acid substitutions at each position by folding the modified sequence with ESMFold [9] and accepting substitutions that satisfy both a global structural improvement criterion and a local displacement threshold. Evaluated on a matched sample of 224 proteins, this set of methods reduced mean RMSD from 8.097 [A] to 4.570 [A] relative to the model's initial prediction, a 43.6% reduction, with corresponding reductions of 46.2% relative to ProteinMPNN and 27.2% relative to native ESMFolded sequences; these differences were statistically significant by paired t-test (p < 0.001). Our results show that post-prediction iterative refinement can significantly improve the structural accuracy of de novo protein sequences.

Related

  1. Flora-YOLO: A lightweight framework for real-time rose grading on edge devices via structural optimization and feature refinement
    Wenwei Liu, Jinyu Xu, Guoao Wang +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyPLOS
  2. Steering sequence generation in protein language models through Iterative Lookback Monte Carlo Sampling
    Francesco Calvanese, Gianluca Lombardi, Martin Weigt +1
    Machine Learning : Science and TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyStatisticsHAL
  3. ProteoEM: probabilistic protein abundance estimation from iterative affinity traces
    Narayanan Raghupathy
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBiophysicsBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
  4. Successor representation supports structural learning of syllable sequences
    J. Liu, Y. Wang, J. Feng +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Multimodal Protein Retrieval via Joint Representation Learning from Sequences and Cryo-EM Density Maps
    A. Tulsani, A. Maddur Guruprakash, S. S. Prasad
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{gammill2026iterative,
  title = {{Iterative Refinement for Structural Optimization of De Novo Protein Sequences}},
  author = {C. M. Gammill and L. Tamil},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.762198},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762198v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Iterative Refinement for Structural Optimization of De Novo Protein Sequences
AU  - C. M. Gammill
AU  - L. Tamil
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.27.762198
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762198v1
AB  - In this paper, we introduce an iterative refinement procedure that substitutes individual amino acid residues in a predicted protein sequence to minimize structural error; substitutions are guided by a weighted composite score of global evaluation metrics including the TM-score, GDT-TS, and RMSD. Starting from an initial sequence prediction produced by a structure-aware graph neural network (GNN) [5], the refinement procedure evaluates candidate amino acid substitutions at each position by folding the modified sequence with ESMFold [9] and accepting substitutions that satisfy both a global structural improvement criterion and a local displacement threshold. Evaluated on a matched sample of 224 proteins, this set of methods reduced mean RMSD from 8.097 [A] to 4.570 [A] relative to the model's initial prediction, a 43.6% reduction, with corresponding reductions of 46.2% relative to ProteinMPNN and 27.2% relative to native ESMFolded sequences; these differences were statistically significant by paired t-test (p < 0.001). Our results show that post-prediction iterative refinement can significantly improve the structural accuracy of de novo protein sequences.
ER  -