Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0BMJ Open

Mapping methodological approaches in perinatal health and wellbeing research involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women: a scoping review protocol

  • Res McCalman1,2
  • Sarah Khaw1
  • Anneka Bowman1,3
  • Isabella Garti1
  • Yvette Roe1
  1. 1Molly Wardaguga Institute for First Nations Birth Rights, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, Northern Territory, Australia
  2. 2La Trobe University Judith Lumley Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3School of Medicine, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

Background: Perinatal health research on, with or by Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander women has grown in recent decades. Research methodologies comprise theoretical frameworks, researcher standpoints and chosen methods, which inform research processes and outcomes. For maximum research benefit and impact for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, methodologies should be culturally authentic and rigorous. This paper aims to examine research methodologies used to inform the body of evidence regarding perinatal health and/or well-being for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in Australia.

Methods and analysis: This protocol follows a process as described by Arksey and O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR). A team approach will be used throughout the review process. A preliminary search of databases for peer-reviewed research articles was undertaken on 10 February 2026, from inception up until this date, and included PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Informit Indigenous Collection (Informit) and Scopus. Independent double screening will occur, where title and abstract screening will locate Australian research articles focusing on Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander women during the perinatal period (up to 1 year post birth), with no date limit. Data extraction will be guided by the Population/Concept/Context (PCC) framework and use a standardised data extraction form. Multi-method analysis will include descriptive data, tables and/or visual graphs and qualitative content analysis.

Ethics and dissemination: A research ethics application was not required for this scoping review. The voices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women should inform and be embedded throughout the design, delivery and evaluation of maternity services aiming to serve Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. It is anticipated that findings from this scoping review will be disseminated publicly at conferences and with community research partners, to support the development and adoption of research approaches that are ethical, culturally grounded and meaningfully aligned with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community priorities.

Related

  1. Fine-mapping of breast cancer susceptibility loci highlights critical methodological dependencies and the value of complementary approaches
    Denise G. O’Mahony, Jonathan Beesley, Maria Zanti +7
    Communications MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineNatureCrossref
  2. National survey of perinatal professionals’ experiences and approaches to conducting prebirth periviable (22+0 to 23+6 weeks) conversations: a mixed-methods study
    Jennifer L H Peterson, Kate Delany, Edward D Johnstone +2
    BMJ Paediatrics OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  3. Somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the scalp in spinal cord injury: A scoping review of methodological approaches and findings
    Alain Patrick Ishimwe, Hassan Khajehpour, Victoria Duda +1
    Clinical Neurophysiology PracticePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  4. A mixed-methods study of methodological approaches in population-based cancer registries in the North and South
    Lisbeth Tolentino-Rodriguez, Sara Luengo, Mariam Fakih +13
    Journal of Cancer PolicyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  5. Comparing methodological approaches for outlier detection: a cross-sectional study of 2744 Australian long-term care facilities
    Dylan Harries, Johannes Schwabe, Robert N Jorissen +11
    International Journal for Quality in Health CarePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{mccalman2026mapping,
  title = {{Mapping methodological approaches in perinatal health and wellbeing research involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women: a scoping review protocol}},
  author = {Res McCalman and Sarah Khaw and Anneka Bowman and Isabella Garti and Yvette Roe},
  journal = {BMJ Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119707},
  url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119707},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mapping methodological approaches in perinatal health and wellbeing research involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women: a scoping review protocol
AU  - Res McCalman
AU  - Sarah Khaw
AU  - Anneka Bowman
AU  - Isabella Garti
AU  - Yvette Roe
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - BMJ Open
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119707
UR  - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119707
AB  - Background: Perinatal health research on, with or by Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander women has grown in recent decades. Research methodologies comprise theoretical frameworks, researcher standpoints and chosen methods, which inform research processes and outcomes. For maximum research benefit and impact for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, methodologies should be culturally authentic and rigorous. This paper aims to examine research methodologies used to inform the body of evidence regarding perinatal health and/or well-being for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in Australia.  Methods and analysis: This protocol follows a process as described by Arksey and O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR). A team approach will be used throughout the review process. A preliminary search of databases for peer-reviewed research articles was undertaken on 10 February 2026, from inception up until this date, and included PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Informit Indigenous Collection (Informit) and Scopus. Independent double screening will occur, where title and abstract screening will locate Australian research articles focusing on Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander women during the perinatal period (up to 1 year post birth), with no date limit. Data extraction will be guided by the Population/Concept/Context (PCC) framework and use a standardised data extraction form. Multi-method analysis will include descriptive data, tables and/or visual graphs and qualitative content analysis.  Ethics and dissemination: A research ethics application was not required for this scoping review. The voices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women should inform and be embedded throughout the design, delivery and evaluation of maternity services aiming to serve Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. It is anticipated that findings from this scoping review will be disseminated publicly at conferences and with community research partners, to support the development and adoption of research approaches that are ethical, culturally grounded and meaningfully aligned with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community priorities.
SN  - 2044-6055
SN  - 2044-6055
ER  -