Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Applied Energy

Impact of local capacity investments in energy communities on national decarbonization pathways

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of local capacity investments in energy communities on national decarbonization pathways. This study uses a long-term energy system model (POLES), enhanced by an energy system modeling framework (Backbone), to optimize the national transmission and distribution grids. This model is further enhanced to account for local capacity investments in energy communities. The results show that energy communities could accelerate the integration of renewables and alleviate distribution grid constraints by more closely aligning production and demand geographically. However, overly extensive integration of energy communities also has drawbacks: they alter the residual load that the main system must supply, but not uniformly. This means that the peak demand remains high, whereas demand could be divided by two during low-demand hours. This could lead to suboptimal use of nuclear plants, which are required to meet peak demand but must reduce their production, leading to lower revenues during midday hours. Moreover, the deployment of energy communities requires control and exchanges between power system actors, as large-scale integration of uncoordinated local investments results in higher capacity requirements, particularly for solar (+100%) and batteries (+130%). A moderate development of energy communities could nevertheless be cost-effective, especially if community members align their demand with the renewable energy production.

Related

  1. Tightness and Error Exponents of SDP with Logarithmically Many Communities
    Shengtao Guo, Ethan X. Fang, Junwei Lu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Framework for Real-Time Deviation Settlement in Local Energy Communities
    Angel M. González-Rueda, Iago Núñez Lugilde, Jose L. Crespo-Vazquez +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. On the critical branching random walk I: branching capacity and visiting probability
    Qingsan Zhu
    Probability Theory and Related FieldsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text21 citedMathematical physicsOpenAlex
  4. Asymptotics of the p-Capacity in the Critical Regime
    Clément Cosco, Shuta Nakajima, Florian Schweiger
    Journal of Convex AnalysisPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text3 citedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  5. Effect of Parity in Cyclically Competing Communities
    T. M. Murdie, D. M. Abrams, A. Bayliss +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textDynamical systemsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{jacquier2026impact,
  title = {{Impact of local capacity investments in energy communities on national decarbonization pathways}},
  author = {Corentin Jacquier and Rémy Rigo-Mariani and Vincent Debusschere and Jean-Nicolas Louis},
  journal = {Applied Energy},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.128814},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05748640v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of local capacity investments in energy communities on national decarbonization pathways
AU  - Corentin Jacquier
AU  - Rémy Rigo-Mariani
AU  - Vincent Debusschere
AU  - Jean-Nicolas Louis
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/14
JO  - Applied Energy
DO  - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.128814
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05748640v1
AB  - This paper investigates the impact of local capacity investments in energy communities on national decarbonization pathways. This study uses a long-term energy system model (POLES), enhanced by an energy system modeling framework (Backbone), to optimize the national transmission and distribution grids. This model is further enhanced to account for local capacity investments in energy communities. The results show that energy communities could accelerate the integration of renewables and alleviate distribution grid constraints by more closely aligning production and demand geographically. However, overly extensive integration of energy communities also has drawbacks: they alter the residual load that the main system must supply, but not uniformly. This means that the peak demand remains high, whereas demand could be divided by two during low-demand hours. This could lead to suboptimal use of nuclear plants, which are required to meet peak demand but must reduce their production, leading to lower revenues during midday hours. Moreover, the deployment of energy communities requires control and exchanges between power system actors, as large-scale integration of uncoordinated local investments results in higher capacity requirements, particularly for solar (+100%) and batteries (+130%). A moderate development of energy communities could nevertheless be cost-effective, especially if community members align their demand with the renewable energy production.
SN  - 0306-2619
ER  -