Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

How Does Child Maltreatment Affect Prosocial Behavior? Disentangling the Unique Contributions of Abuse, Neglect and Emotional Maltreatment

Abstract

Child maltreatment is a well-established risk factor for mental health problems and maladaptive developmental outcomes. However, beyond its well-documented links to psychopathology, child maltreatment can also disrupt social functioning and erode social support, further increasing vulnerability to adverse outcomes across development. Prosocial behavior—voluntary actions intended to benefit others—is a core component of social functioning and supports the formation and maintenance of positive relationships. Although child maltreatment has been consistently linked to lower levels of prosocial behavior in children and adolescents, findings regarding the unique contributions of specific maltreatment dimensions (i.e., abuse, neglect and emotional maltreatment) remain mixed. The present preregistered study therefore aimed to examine the unique contributions of abuse, neglect and emotional maltreatment to the development of prosocial behavior across childhood and adolescence. To this end, we applied structural equation modeling (SEM) to fine-grained and multisource dimensional assessments of maltreatment to examine their unique associations with self- and caregiver-reported prosocial behavior in a large sample (N = 812) of German children and adolescents aged 3 to 16 years. Results indicate that experiences of abuse - but not neglect or emotional maltreatment – were uniquely associated with lower levels of both self- and caregiver-reported prosocial behavior. For caregiver-reported prosocial behavior, these associations further varied by gender and age group: the negative association of abuse was more pronounced in boys, and neglect was additionally associated with lower prosocial behavior among adolescents. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between dimensions of child maltreatment, as abuse appears to play a particularly salient role in undermining prosocial development. Accounting for developmental stage and gender may further refine our understanding of risk pathways in social functioning to ultimately inform more tailored prevention and intervention strategies.

Related

  1. Linking childhood emotional maltreatment to social media addiction: a network perspective on executive function and physical activity
    Yuhan Chen, Ning Wang, Anfa Yuan +4
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. The probabilistic dependency patterns between interpersonal emotion regulation and prosocial behavior in Chinese adolescents: insights from Gaussian Graphical and Bayesian Network Models.
    Mengqi Xiao, Xinyi Huang, Chuyu Yuan +1
    BMC psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  3. What influences food choices in anorexia nervosa? Disentangling cognitive and emotional components of decision-making by translational research
    Laura Di Lodovico, Héloise Hamelin, Lucas Dezorzi +8
    Neuroscience AppliedPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND4 citedPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  4. How physical activity relates to college students’ prosocial behavior through psychological capital and social connectedness
    Wenxin Ke, Jialiang Chen, Geng Li +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossref
  5. The impact of contamination bias when replicating maltreatment effects on child behavior problems
    Anneke E. Olson, John M. Felt, Noah Greifer +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
BibTeX
@misc{berger2026does,
  title = {{How Does Child Maltreatment Affect Prosocial Behavior? Disentangling the Unique Contributions of Abuse, Neglect and Emotional Maltreatment}},
  author = {Philipp Berger and Marian S. Schulz and Tyler Colasante and Georg von Polier and Kai von Klitzing and Andrea Schlesier-Michel and Lars O. White and Tina Malti and Jan Keil},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/2pbkj_v2},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/2pbkj_v2/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - How Does Child Maltreatment Affect Prosocial Behavior? Disentangling the Unique Contributions of Abuse, Neglect and Emotional Maltreatment
AU  - Philipp Berger
AU  - Marian S. Schulz
AU  - Tyler Colasante
AU  - Georg von Polier
AU  - Kai von Klitzing
AU  - Andrea Schlesier-Michel
AU  - Lars O. White
AU  - Tina Malti
AU  - Jan Keil
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/2pbkj_v2
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/2pbkj_v2/
AB  - Child maltreatment is a well-established risk factor for mental health problems and maladaptive developmental outcomes. However, beyond its well-documented links to psychopathology, child maltreatment can also disrupt social functioning and erode social support, further increasing vulnerability to adverse outcomes across development. Prosocial behavior—voluntary actions intended to benefit others—is a core component of social functioning and supports the formation and maintenance of positive relationships. Although child maltreatment has been consistently linked to lower levels of prosocial behavior in children and adolescents, findings regarding the unique contributions of specific maltreatment dimensions (i.e., abuse, neglect and emotional maltreatment) remain mixed. The present preregistered study therefore aimed to examine the unique contributions of abuse, neglect and emotional maltreatment to the development of prosocial behavior across childhood and adolescence. To this end, we applied structural equation modeling (SEM) to fine-grained and multisource dimensional assessments of maltreatment to examine their unique associations with self- and caregiver-reported prosocial behavior in a large sample (N = 812) of German children and adolescents aged 3 to 16 years. Results indicate that experiences of abuse - but not neglect or emotional maltreatment – were uniquely associated with lower levels of both self- and caregiver-reported prosocial behavior. For caregiver-reported prosocial behavior, these associations further varied by gender and age group: the negative association of abuse was more pronounced in boys, and neglect was additionally associated with lower prosocial behavior among adolescents. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between dimensions of child maltreatment, as abuse appears to play a particularly salient role in undermining prosocial development. Accounting for developmental stage and gender may further refine our understanding of risk pathways in social functioning to ultimately inform more tailored prevention and intervention strategies.
ER  -