Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

CVaR anchor regression protects against rare shifts

Abstract

We study prediction in new environments when the training data contains rare, large distribution shifts. Anchor regression penalizes the average of the squared mean residual across environments. It protects against shifts in an ellipsoid determined by the second moment of the training shifts. Covering rare shifts may therefore require a large penalty γ≫ 1, expanding the ellipsoid in every direction and reducing accuracy on common environments. We propose CVaR anchor regression, which replaces the average of the squared mean residuals with a tail average. We prove an exact worst-case risk guarantee under a linear structural model that allows for heteroscedastic noise. CVaR anchor regression protects against shifts in a union of ellipsoids determined by second moments of the shifts in the worst α-fraction of environments. For α small enough, this is the scaled convex hull of the training shifts and their negatives. It therefore covers all training shifts when γ≥ 1. Unlike CVaR or GroupDRO applied directly to prediction risks, CVaR anchor regression does not give environments more weight solely because their noise levels are high. Examples show how the method can improve protection against rare shifts while retaining accuracy on common environments. We illustrate the method on the New York City taxi dataset.

Related

  1. Worst-Case Bayesian CVaR Regret Bounds for Episodic Markov Decision Processes
    Raghav Bongole, Amirreza Zamani, Tobias J. Oechtering +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. Lower bounds for Bayesian CVaR in interactive problems with local differential privacy
    Raghav Bongole, Amirreza Zamani, Tobias J. Oechtering +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Euler Cutting Planes for Fractional CVaR Programming
    Pranay Seshadri, Hubert Dzieciol, Zhe Feng +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Risk-averse design optimization with CVaR constraints via multifidelity tail-region correction
    Gyeolhee Lee, Dongjin Lee
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Tractable Relaxations of Multivariate Stochastic Dominance via Optimal Transport and CVaR
    Bar Light
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{londschien2026cvar,
  title = {{CVaR anchor regression protects against rare shifts}},
  author = {Malte Londschien},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.27034},
  eprint = {2609.27034},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27034},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - CVaR anchor regression protects against rare shifts
AU  - Malte Londschien
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.27034
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27034
AB  - We study prediction in new environments when the training data contains rare, large distribution shifts. Anchor regression penalizes the average of the squared mean residual across environments. It protects against shifts in an ellipsoid determined by the second moment of the training shifts. Covering rare shifts may therefore require a large penalty γ≫ 1, expanding the ellipsoid in every direction and reducing accuracy on common environments. We propose CVaR anchor regression, which replaces the average of the squared mean residuals with a tail average. We prove an exact worst-case risk guarantee under a linear structural model that allows for heteroscedastic noise. CVaR anchor regression protects against shifts in a union of ellipsoids determined by second moments of the shifts in the worst α-fraction of environments. For α small enough, this is the scaled convex hull of the training shifts and their negatives. It therefore covers all training shifts when γ≥ 1. Unlike CVaR or GroupDRO applied directly to prediction risks, CVaR anchor regression does not give environments more weight solely because their noise levels are high. Examples show how the method can improve protection against rare shifts while retaining accuracy on common environments. We illustrate the method on the New York City taxi dataset.
ER  -