Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Risk-averse design optimization with CVaR constraints via multifidelity tail-region correction

Abstract

Risk-averse design optimization with conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) constraints requires accurate tail estimates, but repeated high-fidelity (HF) evaluations are costly. We propose a multifidelity (MF) tail-region correction method that uses dimensionally decomposed generalized polynomial chaos expansion (DD-GPCE) as a global surrogate and directs a limited HF budget to responses that most strongly influence CVaR. Covariance of the estimated DD-GPCE coefficients quantifies finite-sample prediction uncertainty and defines a confidence-interval-based tail region. Within this region, a two-stage strategy explores locations with high prediction uncertainty and then exploits locations with large correction-induced shifts. A Tikhonov-regularized residual expansion using the same polynomial basis yields a unified tail-corrected surrogate. For a ten-bar truss, the method produced a design close to the crude-MCS reference with approximately 72 to 274 times fewer HF evaluations than the considered MF importance sampling configurations. For a suction valve, it reduced mass by 1.05% and bending and bulging CVaR by 17.68% and 21.53%, respectively, while satisfying the valve-opening requirement. The results demonstrate accurate, HF-sample-efficient CVaR-constrained design through localized MF correction.

Related

  1. Optimal study interior partitioning (OSIP): An optimization approach to observational study design under fine balance constraints
    Ron Adar, Asaf Levin
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. A Unified Efficient Gradient-Based Heuristic For Box-Constrained Expectation-Related and Risk-Averse Stochastic Optimization Problems
    Mazen Alamir
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Risk-Averse Decision Making via Quantum Measurement Design
    Meiyi Zhu, Osvaldo Simeone
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Distributed risk-averse optimization via CVaR
    Siyi Wang, Kun Huang, Lei Xu +1
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Local Lyapunov Exponent-Guided Stochastic Midcourse Correction Design of Low-Energy Earth-Moon Transfers
    Zihang Wang, Shuyue Fu, Di Wu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{lee2026riskaverse,
  title = {{Risk-averse design optimization with CVaR constraints via multifidelity tail-region correction}},
  author = {Gyeolhee Lee and Dongjin Lee},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.29222},
  eprint = {2608.29222},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29222},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Risk-averse design optimization with CVaR constraints via multifidelity tail-region correction
AU  - Gyeolhee Lee
AU  - Dongjin Lee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.29222
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29222
AB  - Risk-averse design optimization with conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) constraints requires accurate tail estimates, but repeated high-fidelity (HF) evaluations are costly. We propose a multifidelity (MF) tail-region correction method that uses dimensionally decomposed generalized polynomial chaos expansion (DD-GPCE) as a global surrogate and directs a limited HF budget to responses that most strongly influence CVaR. Covariance of the estimated DD-GPCE coefficients quantifies finite-sample prediction uncertainty and defines a confidence-interval-based tail region. Within this region, a two-stage strategy explores locations with high prediction uncertainty and then exploits locations with large correction-induced shifts. A Tikhonov-regularized residual expansion using the same polynomial basis yields a unified tail-corrected surrogate. For a ten-bar truss, the method produced a design close to the crude-MCS reference with approximately 72 to 274 times fewer HF evaluations than the considered MF importance sampling configurations. For a suction valve, it reduced mass by 1.05% and bending and bulging CVaR by 17.68% and 21.53%, respectively, while satisfying the valve-opening requirement. The results demonstrate accurate, HF-sample-efficient CVaR-constrained design through localized MF correction.
ER  -