Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Naturalistic face-directed attention predicts face recognition ability

  1. 1UNSW Sydney

Abstract

Recognising people precedes and informs most social interactions, yet it is not clear why individuals differ so markedly in face recognition ability. Exposure-based accounts propose that it is shaped by visual experience with faces, known as 'face diet', but most prior work treats exposure as passively acquired, thereby masking the active and dynamic nature of visual attention in natural settings. Here we examined whether spontaneous attention to faces in everyday environments predicts face recognition ability. Eighty participants wore mobile eye-tracking glasses while walking through a busy university campus and during a face-to-face interaction, before completing standard measures of face recognition ability. Fixations directed to faces showed stable individual differences in both settings. People who looked more at faces scored higher on our composite measure of face recognition ability, and gaze in the two settings predicted ability independently, together accounting for 22% of its variance. These findings suggest that differences in how people actively sample visual information from their environments may be an overlooked source of variance in perceptual expertise.

Related

  1. Cortical diffusion restriction predicts individual cognitive ability and carries cellular information
    Demian Wassermann, Gabriela Gomez Jimenez, Reuben Dorent
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsHAL
  2. Mechanisms and measurement of attention in laboratory tasks versus naturalistic learning contexts
    Fang Yu Chang, Xinyi Zoe Mao, Maya Khalil +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
  3. Spectro-temporal modulation sensitivity prospectively predicts speech-in-noise recognition in cochlear implant users
    Julia Erb, Malte Wöstmann, Jens Kreitewolf +3
    Ear and hearingPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurosciencePMC
  4. Emotional arousal predicts pupil responses following a single attention shift between bright and dark moving stimuli
    Kei Kanari, Taihei Tsutsumi
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
  5. Neural evidence for progressive decline of visual face recognition ability in Alzheimer’s disease
    Justine David, Lisa Quenon, Adrian Ivanoiu +6
    Brain CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{white2026naturalistic,
  title = {{Naturalistic face-directed attention predicts face recognition ability}},
  author = {D. White and V. P. L. Varela and M. Piggott and J. D. Dunn and S. Miellet and A. Towler and B. Popovic},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.30.755511},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.30.755511v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Naturalistic face-directed attention predicts face recognition ability
AU  - D. White
AU  - V. P. L. Varela
AU  - M. Piggott
AU  - J. D. Dunn
AU  - S. Miellet
AU  - A. Towler
AU  - B. Popovic
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.30.755511
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.30.755511v1
AB  - Recognising people precedes and informs most social interactions, yet it is not clear why individuals differ so markedly in face recognition ability. Exposure-based accounts propose that it is shaped by visual experience with faces, known as 'face diet', but most prior work treats exposure as passively acquired, thereby masking the active and dynamic nature of visual attention in natural settings. Here we examined whether spontaneous attention to faces in everyday environments predicts face recognition ability. Eighty participants wore mobile eye-tracking glasses while walking through a busy university campus and during a face-to-face interaction, before completing standard measures of face recognition ability. Fixations directed to faces showed stable individual differences in both settings. People who looked more at faces scored higher on our composite measure of face recognition ability, and gaze in the two settings predicted ability independently, together accounting for 22% of its variance. These findings suggest that differences in how people actively sample visual information from their environments may be an overlooked source of variance in perceptual expertise.
ER  -