Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Mechanisms and measurement of attention in laboratory tasks versus naturalistic learning contexts

Abstract

Translation of laboratory-derived metrics to quantify learning in naturalistic settings is an important goal in neuroscience. In the current study we tested if a common neural metric of visual attention, alpha-range (8–12 Hz) oscillations, generalizes from laboratory to naturalistic learning. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) in eighty 6–10-year-old children while they participated in naturalistic learning activities and during a laboratory spatial working memory task ( n = 51 final sample). We found that alpha power during the activities did not correlate with event-related alpha power modulations (ERMs) during stimulus processing in the laboratory task, a common indicator of visual attention. By contrast, multiple control analyses showed the expected relationships among baseline activity, task-related modulation and behavioral performance. These results suggest that alpha ERMs during task processing reflect different neural processes of visual attention than alpha power during learning activities – potentially reflecting additional contributions from arousal, motivation or motor activity in naturalistic environments. These findings suggest that laboratory-derived neural metrics of visual attention may not directly generalize to naturalistic learning, highlighting the need to consider multiple contributing processes when translating laboratory-derived neural metrics to naturalistic learning.

Related

  1. Naturalistic face-directed attention predicts face recognition ability
    D. White, V. P. L. Varela, M. Piggott +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  2. Decoding motor imagery EEG signals by a deep learning network integrating multiscale filtering and temporal-channel attention mechanisms
    Yong Zhu, Yongge Shi, Jianhua Wu +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurosciencePLOSEurope PMC
  3. Post-Learning Reactivation of Memories for Naturalistic Continuous Experiences
    N. Wolf, J. W. Antony, A. I. Delarazan +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. The neurocomputational mechanisms of naturalistic trait impression updating
    Lindsey Tepfer, Chujun Lin, Mark Allen Thornton
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  5. Assessing measurement uncertainty at laboratory network scale and its impact on diagnostic performance in the absence of a gold standard: application to ELISA tests for Coxiella burnetii in ruminants
    L. Riviere, M.-L. Delignette Muller, M. Prigent +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{chang2026mechanisms,
  title = {{Mechanisms and measurement of attention in laboratory tasks versus naturalistic learning contexts}},
  author = {Fang Yu Chang and Xinyi Zoe Mao and Maya Khalil and Mark D. Rapport and Andrea Dillon and Sandra K. Loo and Jennie K. Grammer and Agatha Lenartowicz},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-76587-6},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-76587-6},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mechanisms and measurement of attention in laboratory tasks versus naturalistic learning contexts
AU  - Fang Yu Chang
AU  - Xinyi Zoe Mao
AU  - Maya Khalil
AU  - Mark D. Rapport
AU  - Andrea Dillon
AU  - Sandra K. Loo
AU  - Jennie K. Grammer
AU  - Agatha Lenartowicz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-76587-6
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-76587-6
AB  - Translation of laboratory-derived metrics to quantify learning in naturalistic settings is an important goal in neuroscience. In the current study we tested if a common neural metric of visual attention, alpha-range (8–12 Hz) oscillations, generalizes from laboratory to naturalistic learning. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) in eighty 6–10-year-old children while they participated in naturalistic learning activities and during a laboratory spatial working memory task ( n = 51 final sample). We found that alpha power during the activities did not correlate with event-related alpha power modulations (ERMs) during stimulus processing in the laboratory task, a common indicator of visual attention. By contrast, multiple control analyses showed the expected relationships among baseline activity, task-related modulation and behavioral performance. These results suggest that alpha ERMs during task processing reflect different neural processes of visual attention than alpha power during learning activities – potentially reflecting additional contributions from arousal, motivation or motor activity in naturalistic environments. These findings suggest that laboratory-derived neural metrics of visual attention may not directly generalize to naturalistic learning, highlighting the need to consider multiple contributing processes when translating laboratory-derived neural metrics to naturalistic learning.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -