Mechanisms and measurement of attention in laboratory tasks versus naturalistic learning contexts
Abstract
Translation of laboratory-derived metrics to quantify learning in naturalistic settings is an important goal in neuroscience. In the current study we tested if a common neural metric of visual attention, alpha-range (8–12 Hz) oscillations, generalizes from laboratory to naturalistic learning. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) in eighty 6–10-year-old children while they participated in naturalistic learning activities and during a laboratory spatial working memory task ( n = 51 final sample). We found that alpha power during the activities did not correlate with event-related alpha power modulations (ERMs) during stimulus processing in the laboratory task, a common indicator of visual attention. By contrast, multiple control analyses showed the expected relationships among baseline activity, task-related modulation and behavioral performance. These results suggest that alpha ERMs during task processing reflect different neural processes of visual attention than alpha power during learning activities – potentially reflecting additional contributions from arousal, motivation or motor activity in naturalistic environments. These findings suggest that laboratory-derived neural metrics of visual attention may not directly generalize to naturalistic learning, highlighting the need to consider multiple contributing processes when translating laboratory-derived neural metrics to naturalistic learning.
Related
- Naturalistic face-directed attention predicts face recognition ability
- Decoding motor imagery EEG signals by a deep learning network integrating multiscale filtering and temporal-channel attention mechanisms
- Post-Learning Reactivation of Memories for Naturalistic Continuous Experiences
- The neurocomputational mechanisms of naturalistic trait impression updating
- Assessing measurement uncertainty at laboratory network scale and its impact on diagnostic performance in the absence of a gold standard: application to ELISA tests for Coxiella burnetii in ruminants
BibTeX
@article{chang2026mechanisms,
title = {{Mechanisms and measurement of attention in laboratory tasks versus naturalistic learning contexts}},
author = {Fang Yu Chang and Xinyi Zoe Mao and Maya Khalil and Mark D. Rapport and Andrea Dillon and Sandra K. Loo and Jennie K. Grammer and Agatha Lenartowicz},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-76587-6},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-76587-6},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Mechanisms and measurement of attention in laboratory tasks versus naturalistic learning contexts
AU - Fang Yu Chang
AU - Xinyi Zoe Mao
AU - Maya Khalil
AU - Mark D. Rapport
AU - Andrea Dillon
AU - Sandra K. Loo
AU - Jennie K. Grammer
AU - Agatha Lenartowicz
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-76587-6
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-76587-6
AB - Translation of laboratory-derived metrics to quantify learning in naturalistic settings is an important goal in neuroscience. In the current study we tested if a common neural metric of visual attention, alpha-range (8–12 Hz) oscillations, generalizes from laboratory to naturalistic learning. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) in eighty 6–10-year-old children while they participated in naturalistic learning activities and during a laboratory spatial working memory task ( n = 51 final sample). We found that alpha power during the activities did not correlate with event-related alpha power modulations (ERMs) during stimulus processing in the laboratory task, a common indicator of visual attention. By contrast, multiple control analyses showed the expected relationships among baseline activity, task-related modulation and behavioral performance. These results suggest that alpha ERMs during task processing reflect different neural processes of visual attention than alpha power during learning activities – potentially reflecting additional contributions from arousal, motivation or motor activity in naturalistic environments. These findings suggest that laboratory-derived neural metrics of visual attention may not directly generalize to naturalistic learning, highlighting the need to consider multiple contributing processes when translating laboratory-derived neural metrics to naturalistic learning.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -