Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBrain and behavior

Transcranial Pulse Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.

  1. 1Department of Health Sciences, Neuropsychobiology and Motor Control Laboratory, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  2. 2Instituto Regenera Dor, Juazeiro do Norte, Ceará, Brazil.
  3. 3Laboratory of Neuroscience, Neuromodulation and Study of Pain (LANNED), Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Abstract

Background

Transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) is an emerging ultrasound-based neuromodulation technique with potential applications in Parkinson's disease (PD). This systematic review evaluated its clinical efficacy, neurophysiological and neuroimaging effects, safety, and certainty of evidence.Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched for clinical studies investigating TPS in adults with idiopathic PD. Motor, non-motor, cognitive, neurophysiological, neuroimaging, and safety outcomes were narratively synthesized because of methodological heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.Results

Four studies involving 80 participants were included: two sham-controlled studies, one prospective open-label pilot study, and one retrospective uncontrolled study. Uncontrolled studies reported improvements in motor function, non-motor symptoms, cognition, mood, and quality of life. However, a randomized double-blind crossover trial demonstrated no superiority of active TPS over sham for global motor scores (MDS-UPDRS Part III). Significant improvements in left-hand manual dexterity persisted for one month and were accompanied by sensorimotor activation and white-matter changes. A single-session study reported immediate resting-tremor reduction, although sustained superiority over sham remained uncertain. Electroencephalographic findings suggested cortical oscillatory modulation. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. Evidence certainty ranged from moderate to very low.Conclusions

TPS shows preliminary potential to modulate sensorimotor networks and improve selected motor outcomes in PD. However, evidence remains insufficient to establish overall clinical efficacy. Larger, rigorously controlled trials are required to determine sustained benefits, optimal stimulation protocols, and long-term safety.

Related

  1. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on gait and balance under dual-task conditions in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yunxing Bi, Hongjie Ni, Ziqing Hou +1
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Efficacy of High‐Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Depression With Insomnia Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wenqing Yang, Songbin Chen, Xiaotong Li +3
    Brain and BehaviorPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  3. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on focal hand dystonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zeynep B Simsek, Patrick J Mulcahey, Michael W Lutz +2
    Dystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  4. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on patient-reported outcomes in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis.
    Chenming Wang, Nianting Zhou, Sizhuo Zhang +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  5. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with sertraline for adolescent depression in China
    Hongyi Sun, Lin Zhang, Jing Hu +2
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{pereira2026transcranial,
  title = {{Transcranial Pulse Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.}},
  author = {Gabrielly Santos Pereira and Gustavo Henrique de Mello Rosa and Palmerindo Antônio Tavares de Mendonça Neto and João Eduardo de Araújo and Marcelo Lourenço da Silva},
  journal = {Brain and behavior},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1002/brb3.71895},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42975199},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Transcranial Pulse Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.
AU  - Gabrielly Santos Pereira
AU  - Gustavo Henrique de Mello Rosa
AU  - Palmerindo Antônio Tavares de Mendonça Neto
AU  - João Eduardo de Araújo
AU  - Marcelo Lourenço da Silva
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Brain and behavior
DO  - 10.1002/brb3.71895
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42975199
AB  - Background  Transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) is an emerging ultrasound-based neuromodulation technique with potential applications in Parkinson's disease (PD). This systematic review evaluated its clinical efficacy, neurophysiological and neuroimaging effects, safety, and certainty of evidence.Methods  PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched for clinical studies investigating TPS in adults with idiopathic PD. Motor, non-motor, cognitive, neurophysiological, neuroimaging, and safety outcomes were narratively synthesized because of methodological heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.Results  Four studies involving 80 participants were included: two sham-controlled studies, one prospective open-label pilot study, and one retrospective uncontrolled study. Uncontrolled studies reported improvements in motor function, non-motor symptoms, cognition, mood, and quality of life. However, a randomized double-blind crossover trial demonstrated no superiority of active TPS over sham for global motor scores (MDS-UPDRS Part III). Significant improvements in left-hand manual dexterity persisted for one month and were accompanied by sensorimotor activation and white-matter changes. A single-session study reported immediate resting-tremor reduction, although sustained superiority over sham remained uncertain. Electroencephalographic findings suggested cortical oscillatory modulation. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. Evidence certainty ranged from moderate to very low.Conclusions  TPS shows preliminary potential to modulate sensorimotor networks and improve selected motor outcomes in PD. However, evidence remains insufficient to establish overall clinical efficacy. Larger, rigorously controlled trials are required to determine sustained benefits, optimal stimulation protocols, and long-term safety.
SN  - 2162-3279
ER  -