A single-session randomised crossover fNIRS study comparing three upper-limb mirror therapy task paradigms in healthy adults: a study protocol
- 1Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology; The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Abstract
BackgroundMirror therapy (MT)--specifically paradigms using mirror visual feedback (MVF)--is widely used in neurorehabilitation; however, mechanistic implementations vary substantially in movement content, rhythmicity and attentional demands. This protocol describes an acute mechanistic, within-participant fNIRS screening study designed to compare three prespecified upper-limb mirror-therapy task paradigms and to quantify associated subjective experience after each condition in healthy adults during a single visit.
Methods and analysisThis is a single-centre, within-participant, randomised crossover study conducted at Wuhan Wuchang Hospital (Wuhan, China). Healthy adults aged 18-35 years will complete three task conditions once each in a counterbalanced order using a 3x3 Latin-square scheme: UMT1 (task-oriented rhythmic functional movement), UMT2 (open-ended free movement with auditory control), and UMT3 (non-functional rhythmic movement). fNIRS will be acquired using the NirSmart-6000A system during a standardised block design. The primary outcome is ROI-level HbO activation quantified as GLM-derived {beta} estimates within the prespecified primary ROIs (bilateral SM1/M1 and bilateral PMC). Secondary outcomes include ROI-level windowed {Delta}HbO (5-20 s post-onset relative to the immediately preceding rest; descriptive only), ROI-level {Delta}HbR, and post-condition subjective ratings (illusion, immersion, confusion and fatigue; 1-7 Likert). Condition effects will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for condition and period and prespecified multiplicity-adjusted pairwise contrasts.
Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Approval No.: 2025-112-01; approved on 2025-08-21). The study is expected to be minimal risk. Findings will be disseminated through publication of this protocol manuscript and subsequent results manuscripts and conference presentations.
Trial registration numberChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2600116634). This study is conducted as a prespecified mechanistic sub-study under the overarching registered project.
Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIWithin-participant randomised crossover design reduces between-participant variability for mechanistic comparisons. C_LIO_LIPrespecified task timing, ROIs, contrasts and multiplicity control reduce analytic flexibility. C_LIO_LILatin-square counterbalancing and modelling of period effects mitigate systematic sequence bias. C_LIO_LIHealthy-participant, single-session design limits direct generalisability to clinical stroke populations and long-term treatment effects. C_LIO_LIfNIRS remains sensitive to motion and scalp-optode coupling; residual artefacts may persist despite prespecified QC and preprocessing. C_LI
Related
- Evaluating 20-session augmented depression therapy for complex depression (ADepT+) versus usual care: a study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
- TeleBACK clinical trial: comparing the effectiveness of telerehabilitation and in-clinic physical therapy for patients with chronic low back pain - protocol for a multicentre, pragmatic, individually randomised group treatment trial.
- Pain alleviation in diabetic neuropathy using hybrid closed loop insulin pumps (PAINLESS) – A randomised crossover trial protocol
- Comparing the safety and quality of video versus telephone telehealth using simulated consultations on fictional medications for an Australian community sample: a randomised controlled trial protocol
- Long-Term Effects of Paced Heart Rate on Central Blood Pressure in Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction and Hypertension: A Randomised Crossover Study
BibTeX
@misc{yang2026singlesession,
title = {{A single-session randomised crossover fNIRS study comparing three upper-limb mirror therapy task paradigms in healthy adults: a study protocol}},
author = {T. Yang and S. Wei and Y. Wang and D. Bai},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.28.26361691},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.28.26361691v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - A single-session randomised crossover fNIRS study comparing three upper-limb mirror therapy task paradigms in healthy adults: a study protocol
AU - T. Yang
AU - S. Wei
AU - Y. Wang
AU - D. Bai
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/28
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.28.26361691
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.28.26361691v1
AB - BackgroundMirror therapy (MT)--specifically paradigms using mirror visual feedback (MVF)--is widely used in neurorehabilitation; however, mechanistic implementations vary substantially in movement content, rhythmicity and attentional demands. This protocol describes an acute mechanistic, within-participant fNIRS screening study designed to compare three prespecified upper-limb mirror-therapy task paradigms and to quantify associated subjective experience after each condition in healthy adults during a single visit. Methods and analysisThis is a single-centre, within-participant, randomised crossover study conducted at Wuhan Wuchang Hospital (Wuhan, China). Healthy adults aged 18-35 years will complete three task conditions once each in a counterbalanced order using a 3x3 Latin-square scheme: UMT1 (task-oriented rhythmic functional movement), UMT2 (open-ended free movement with auditory control), and UMT3 (non-functional rhythmic movement). fNIRS will be acquired using the NirSmart-6000A system during a standardised block design. The primary outcome is ROI-level HbO activation quantified as GLM-derived {beta} estimates within the prespecified primary ROIs (bilateral SM1/M1 and bilateral PMC). Secondary outcomes include ROI-level windowed {Delta}HbO (5-20 s post-onset relative to the immediately preceding rest; descriptive only), ROI-level {Delta}HbR, and post-condition subjective ratings (illusion, immersion, confusion and fatigue; 1-7 Likert). Condition effects will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for condition and period and prespecified multiplicity-adjusted pairwise contrasts. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Approval No.: 2025-112-01; approved on 2025-08-21). The study is expected to be minimal risk. Findings will be disseminated through publication of this protocol manuscript and subsequent results manuscripts and conference presentations. Trial registration numberChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2600116634). This study is conducted as a prespecified mechanistic sub-study under the overarching registered project. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIWithin-participant randomised crossover design reduces between-participant variability for mechanistic comparisons. C_LIO_LIPrespecified task timing, ROIs, contrasts and multiplicity control reduce analytic flexibility. C_LIO_LILatin-square counterbalancing and modelling of period effects mitigate systematic sequence bias. C_LIO_LIHealthy-participant, single-session design limits direct generalisability to clinical stroke populations and long-term treatment effects. C_LIO_LIfNIRS remains sensitive to motion and scalp-optode coupling; residual artefacts may persist despite prespecified QC and preprocessing. C_LI
ER -