Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,688 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Lossy Lorentz boosts at ultra-relativistic energies: Numerical study and source survey of high-energy physics software

Abstract

Most high-energy-physics software packages implement Lorentz boosts for themselves. At sufficiently large boosts, these routines can return finite, plausible-looking four-vectors whose invariant masses and rest-frame properties are no longer accurate. We survey implementations in widely used collider and air-shower software and compare representative algorithms in three numerical tests. We find that the main problem is usually information discarded by the representation, rather than the arithmetic of the boost formula. Information can be lost when a boost is specified only by its velocity, and again when the result is stored only through Cartesian components. Richer boost input prevents the first loss, while retaining light-cone coordinates prevents the second. Ordinary hard processes at present colliders are safe in double precision; the relevant regimes are low-mass systems, highly boosted auxiliary frames, single-precision particle records and air-shower simulations. Extreme scale hierarchies in parton-shower accuracy tests and ultra-heavy particle decays provide still more demanding cases.

Related

  1. Projective relativistic dynamics from a quantum Lorentz algebra: time-dependent deformed Hamiltonians on (anti-)de Sitter spaces
    Rutwig Campoamor-Stursberg, Oscar Carballal, Francisco J. Herranz
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  2. Terahertz-driven electron acceleration from subrelativistic to fully relativistic energies in stepped dielectric-lined waveguides
    Filip J. Peczek, Laurence J. R. Nix, Graeme Burt +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
  3. EOS version 1.1: A Software for Flavor Physics Phenomenology
    Nienke C Balz, Carolina Bolognani, Marta Burgos Marcos +18
    HALPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsHALarXiv
  4. Reliable LLM-Generated Programs for High-Energy Physics Experiments through Graph-Grounded Software Knowledge
    Yue Sun, Tong Liu, Yipu Liao +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. AloHEP Software: A luminosity optimizer for High Energy Physics colliders
    Burak Dagli, Yigitali Karaca
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationComputational physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bierlich2026lossy,
  title = {{Lossy Lorentz boosts at ultra-relativistic energies: Numerical study and source survey of high-energy physics software}},
  author = {Christian Bierlich},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.21897},
  eprint = {2610.21897},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21897},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Lossy Lorentz boosts at ultra-relativistic energies: Numerical study and source survey of high-energy physics software
AU  - Christian Bierlich
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.21897
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21897
AB  - Most high-energy-physics software packages implement Lorentz boosts for themselves. At sufficiently large boosts, these routines can return finite, plausible-looking four-vectors whose invariant masses and rest-frame properties are no longer accurate. We survey implementations in widely used collider and air-shower software and compare representative algorithms in three numerical tests. We find that the main problem is usually information discarded by the representation, rather than the arithmetic of the boost formula. Information can be lost when a boost is specified only by its velocity, and again when the result is stored only through Cartesian components. Richer boost input prevents the first loss, while retaining light-cone coordinates prevents the second. Ordinary hard processes at present colliders are safe in double precision; the relevant regimes are low-mass systems, highly boosted auxiliary frames, single-precision particle records and air-shower simulations. Extreme scale hierarchies in parton-shower accuracy tests and ultra-heavy particle decays provide still more demanding cases.
ER  -