Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCBMJ public health

Health facility readiness to provide quality emergency obstetric and newborn care in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Community Health, Mbarara University of Science and Technology Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara, Uganda.
  2. 2Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
  3. 3KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
  4. 4Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara, Uganda.
  5. 5Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Abstract

Introduction

Despite efforts to improve maternal and newborn care services, maternal and newborn mortality in Uganda remains high. Over half of births occur in lower-level health facilities, where limited readiness and suboptimal quality of care may hinder the provision of emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC). This study aimed to assess health facility readiness to provide quality EmONC in Kasese and Bundibugyo districts, midwestern Uganda.Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in all 42 district-level public health facilities (health centre (HC) IIIs, HC IVs and general hospitals) offering childbirth services in Kasese and Bundibugyo districts. We used a facility assessment questionnaire based on the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment and the Averting Maternal Death and Disability tool. Composite readiness scores were calculated across five domains (human resources, physical resources, referral, equipment and drugs and supplies) and signal functions by health facility level. HCIII facilities were considered Basic EmONC (BEmONC), while HC IVs and general hospitals were considered comprehensive EmONC (CEmONC) facilities.Results

The overall mean availability of expected signal functions was 42.3%, and overall readiness was 53.3%. These were lowest in HCIIIs. The least provided CEmONC signal function was blood transfusion, available in 83.3% (n=5) of the CEmONC-designated facilities, and assisted vaginal delivery was the most frequently missing BEmONC signal function, with no facilities reporting its provision. Staffing and training were most available at 70.6%, while physical resources (44%) and functional referral system (44.7%) were least available.Conclusions

EmONC signal function availability and overall readiness were suboptimal, particularly at HC IIIs. Strengthening the capacity and readiness of HC IIIs, improving essential resources and enhancing referral systems should be prioritised to improve access to quality EmONC.

Related

  1. Simulation-Based Outreach Program to Support Community Hospitals’ Team Readiness for Obstetric Emergencies Across a Rural Health System
    Jesse M Rideout, Micheline Chipman, Beth Gray +7
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. A scoping review of agenda setting and implementation of the free emergency obstetric care policy in sub Saharan Africa from 2007 to 2024
    Sèhouèdé Christelle Judith Deguenon, Delphin Kolié, Abdoulaye Sow +6
    Discover Health SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsDOAJ
  3. Nutrition Knowledge, Information Sources, and Self-Perceived Ability to Provide Nutrition Counseling Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Eva Luyufeng Yáñez-Izquierdo, Ana Presa-Carrera, Carlos Enrique Adán-Failde +1
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  4. Importance-performance gap analysis of health service quality in conflict-affected Yemen: a cross-sectional facility-based survey of patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives
    Dalia Hyzam, Fekri Dureab, Mustafa Dhaiban +6
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  5. Knowledge of gestational diabetes mellitus and its sociodemographic determinants among pregnant women in Bangladesh: a nationwide facility-based cross-sectional study.
    Bishwajit Bhowmik, Hafiza Nasrin, Tasnima Siddiquee +10
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{turigye2026health,
  title = {{Health facility readiness to provide quality emergency obstetric and newborn care in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study.}},
  author = {Brian Turigye and Peter M Macharia and Edgar M Mulogo and Joseph Ngonzi and Michael Kanyesigye and Lenka Benova},
  journal = {BMJ public health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1136/bmjph-2026-005103},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921089},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Health facility readiness to provide quality emergency obstetric and newborn care in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study.
AU  - Brian Turigye
AU  - Peter M Macharia
AU  - Edgar M Mulogo
AU  - Joseph Ngonzi
AU  - Michael Kanyesigye
AU  - Lenka Benova
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - BMJ public health
DO  - 10.1136/bmjph-2026-005103
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921089
AB  - Introduction  Despite efforts to improve maternal and newborn care services, maternal and newborn mortality in Uganda remains high. Over half of births occur in lower-level health facilities, where limited readiness and suboptimal quality of care may hinder the provision of emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC). This study aimed to assess health facility readiness to provide quality EmONC in Kasese and Bundibugyo districts, midwestern Uganda.Methods  A cross-sectional survey was conducted in all 42 district-level public health facilities (health centre (HC) IIIs, HC IVs and general hospitals) offering childbirth services in Kasese and Bundibugyo districts. We used a facility assessment questionnaire based on the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment and the Averting Maternal Death and Disability tool. Composite readiness scores were calculated across five domains (human resources, physical resources, referral, equipment and drugs and supplies) and signal functions by health facility level. HCIII facilities were considered Basic EmONC (BEmONC), while HC IVs and general hospitals were considered comprehensive EmONC (CEmONC) facilities.Results  The overall mean availability of expected signal functions was 42.3%, and overall readiness was 53.3%. These were lowest in HCIIIs. The least provided CEmONC signal function was blood transfusion, available in 83.3% (n=5) of the CEmONC-designated facilities, and assisted vaginal delivery was the most frequently missing BEmONC signal function, with no facilities reporting its provision. Staffing and training were most available at 70.6%, while physical resources (44%) and functional referral system (44.7%) were least available.Conclusions  EmONC signal function availability and overall readiness were suboptimal, particularly at HC IIIs. Strengthening the capacity and readiness of HC IIIs, improving essential resources and enhancing referral systems should be prioritised to improve access to quality EmONC.
SN  - 2753-4294
ER  -