Experimental Comparison of Half-Value Layer Measurements Using a Solid-State X-ray Meter and an Ionization Chamber in General Radiography
- 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Tokushima Bunri University, Takamatsu City, JPN
- 2Department of Radiology, Kochi University Hospital, Kochi, JPN
- 3Department of Diagnostic Imaging Technology and Clinical Support, Itsukaichi Memorial Hospital, Hiroshima, JPN
Abstract
Background: Half-value layer (HVL) is a fundamental descriptor of diagnostic X-ray beam quality. This study compared HVL measurements obtained with a solid-state X-ray meter (Cobia SMART, RTI Group, Mölndal, SWE) and an ionization-chamber dosimetry system across multiple tube-voltage and measurement-distance conditions.
Methods: Measurements were performed at 60, 80, 100, and 120 kV and source-to-detector distances (SDDs) of 100, 150, and 200 cm. The corresponding exposure settings were 50, 110, and 200 mAs, respectively. Three independent ionization-chamber HVL determinations and three Cobia readings were obtained for each condition. Agreement was evaluated using absolute and percentage differences and descriptive Bland-Altman analysis. A partial uncertainty assessment incorporated repeatability-based type A uncertainty and the 0.1 mm Al recording resolution of the Cobia data.
Results: The ionization-chamber coefficient of variation ranged from 0.09% to 2.38%, with a mean of 1.16%. Cobia showed identical recorded triplicate values at each tube voltage, with HVLs of 2.1, 2.9, 3.7, and 4.6 mm Al at 60, 80, 100, and 120 kV, respectively. Eleven of the 12 paired conditions differed by no more than 0.20 mm Al. The largest discrepancy occurred at 120 kV and 150 cm, where the difference was +0.466 mm Al (+11.27%). Bland-Altman analysis yielded a mean bias of +0.057 mm Al, with descriptive 95% limits of agreement from -0.240 to +0.353 mm Al.
Conclusions: Cobia SMART demonstrated stable recorded HVL values and generally close agreement with the ionization-chamber method across most tested conditions. However, a notable discrepancy was observed at 120 kV and 150 cm, indicating that agreement under one exposure condition should not be generalized across the entire diagnostic range. Cobia SMART may be a practical tool for rapid routine HVL quality-control measurements, with periodic comparison against a calibrated reference dosimetry system advisable after changes in measurement geometry or when unexpected HVL values are obtained.
Related
- Automatic transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of patients with mitral valve prolapse: comparison with patients without structural cardiac chamber remodeling (an exploratory study)
- Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of furcation perforations: an in vitro comparison with periapical radiography and micro-computed tomography
- Comparison of Biometric Measurements Between Anterior Segment Hyperparallel and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
- Is Appearance-Related Social Comparison a Causal Mechanism Underlying Appearance-Related Psychopathology Among Young Adult Women? An Experimental Test
- Interpreting antiviral effects: from experimental measurements to mechanistic viral dynamics.
BibTeX
@article{katagiri2026experimental,
title = {{Experimental Comparison of Half-Value Layer Measurements Using a Solid-State X-ray Meter and an Ionization Chamber in General Radiography}},
author = {Kunihiko Katagiri and Genta Ito and Toshiki Hirakado},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.117313},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13723282},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Experimental Comparison of Half-Value Layer Measurements Using a Solid-State X-ray Meter and an Ionization Chamber in General Radiography
AU - Kunihiko Katagiri
AU - Genta Ito
AU - Toshiki Hirakado
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.117313
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13723282
AB - Background: Half-value layer (HVL) is a fundamental descriptor of diagnostic X-ray beam quality. This study compared HVL measurements obtained with a solid-state X-ray meter (Cobia SMART, RTI Group, Mölndal, SWE) and an ionization-chamber dosimetry system across multiple tube-voltage and measurement-distance conditions. Methods: Measurements were performed at 60, 80, 100, and 120 kV and source-to-detector distances (SDDs) of 100, 150, and 200 cm. The corresponding exposure settings were 50, 110, and 200 mAs, respectively. Three independent ionization-chamber HVL determinations and three Cobia readings were obtained for each condition. Agreement was evaluated using absolute and percentage differences and descriptive Bland-Altman analysis. A partial uncertainty assessment incorporated repeatability-based type A uncertainty and the 0.1 mm Al recording resolution of the Cobia data. Results: The ionization-chamber coefficient of variation ranged from 0.09% to 2.38%, with a mean of 1.16%. Cobia showed identical recorded triplicate values at each tube voltage, with HVLs of 2.1, 2.9, 3.7, and 4.6 mm Al at 60, 80, 100, and 120 kV, respectively. Eleven of the 12 paired conditions differed by no more than 0.20 mm Al. The largest discrepancy occurred at 120 kV and 150 cm, where the difference was +0.466 mm Al (+11.27%). Bland-Altman analysis yielded a mean bias of +0.057 mm Al, with descriptive 95% limits of agreement from -0.240 to +0.353 mm Al. Conclusions: Cobia SMART demonstrated stable recorded HVL values and generally close agreement with the ionization-chamber method across most tested conditions. However, a notable discrepancy was observed at 120 kV and 150 cm, indicating that agreement under one exposure condition should not be generalized across the entire diagnostic range. Cobia SMART may be a practical tool for rapid routine HVL quality-control measurements, with periodic comparison against a calibrated reference dosimetry system advisable after changes in measurement geometry or when unexpected HVL values are obtained.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -