Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in molecular biosciences

Interpreting antiviral effects: from experimental measurements to mechanistic viral dynamics.

  1. 1Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Abstract

Antiviral activity is commonly summarized using endpoint measures such as EC50 or EC90, yet these quantities emerge from a dynamic biological system and depend on viral replication kinetics, host-cell properties, experimental design, and the assay used to quantify infection. Infectious-virus titers, viral RNA, infected-cell fractions, viability measurements, and immune readouts capture different components of the infection process and are therefore not interchangeable measures of "viral load." Mechanistic viral-dynamics models provide a framework for linking such observations to underlying processes, including cell infection, intracellular replication, virus production, cell loss, and host-mediated control. However, the biological information that can be recovered from these models is fundamentally constrained by experimental observability and parameter identifiability. This limitation becomes increasingly important across biological scales: in vitro systems permit dense multimodal measurements and controlled perturbations, whereas animal and human studies provide greater physiological relevance but substantially sparser and more indirect observations. Here, we review how experimental readouts map onto viral-dynamics models, how model structure and parameter inference affect mechanistic interpretation, and how controlled in vitro systems can be used to distinguish competing mechanisms of infection and antiviral action. We further discuss examples in which viral-dynamics modeling has contributed to antiviral pharmacology and regimen selection. Together, these considerations support a view of antiviral effects as context-dependent dynamic phenotypes that require joint interpretation of measurements, models, and experimental design.

Related

  1. A mechanistic framework for interpreting blood-stage malaria vaccine efficacy
    J. R. Wood, J. Challenger, T. Churcher +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textInfectious diseasemedRxiv
  2. Mechanistic exploration of Wenyang Zhenshuai granules in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: integrating network pharmacology and experimental validation
    Xu Deng, Xiaoping Li, Jialuo Cai +4
    Journal of Cardiothoracic SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  3. Experimental Comparison of Half-Value Layer Measurements Using a Solid-State X-ray Meter and an Ionization Chamber in General Radiography
    Kunihiko Katagiri, Genta Ito, Toshiki Hirakado
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMCPMC
  4. Hybrid Mechanistic-Neural Modeling of Concentration-Time Dynamics Generalizes Human Pharmacokinetics Prediction Across Unseen Chemical Space
    A. Badkul, L. Cai, M. Kim +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologybioRxiv
  5. Metabolic Profiling, Antioxidant Activity, and Mechanistic Insights of Chicory from Northern and Southern China: Integrating Metabolomics, Machine Learning, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and In Vitro Assays
    Dan He, Yaxuan Li, Jiarun Zhang +4
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{nersisyan2026interpreting,
  title = {{Interpreting antiviral effects: from experimental measurements to mechanistic viral dynamics.}},
  author = {Ashot Nersisyan},
  journal = {Frontiers in molecular biosciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fmolb.2026.1995001},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948315},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Interpreting antiviral effects: from experimental measurements to mechanistic viral dynamics.
AU  - Ashot Nersisyan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Frontiers in molecular biosciences
DO  - 10.3389/fmolb.2026.1995001
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948315
AB  - Antiviral activity is commonly summarized using endpoint measures such as EC50 or EC90, yet these quantities emerge from a dynamic biological system and depend on viral replication kinetics, host-cell properties, experimental design, and the assay used to quantify infection. Infectious-virus titers, viral RNA, infected-cell fractions, viability measurements, and immune readouts capture different components of the infection process and are therefore not interchangeable measures of "viral load." Mechanistic viral-dynamics models provide a framework for linking such observations to underlying processes, including cell infection, intracellular replication, virus production, cell loss, and host-mediated control. However, the biological information that can be recovered from these models is fundamentally constrained by experimental observability and parameter identifiability. This limitation becomes increasingly important across biological scales: in vitro systems permit dense multimodal measurements and controlled perturbations, whereas animal and human studies provide greater physiological relevance but substantially sparser and more indirect observations. Here, we review how experimental readouts map onto viral-dynamics models, how model structure and parameter inference affect mechanistic interpretation, and how controlled in vitro systems can be used to distinguish competing mechanisms of infection and antiviral action. We further discuss examples in which viral-dynamics modeling has contributed to antiviral pharmacology and regimen selection. Together, these considerations support a view of antiviral effects as context-dependent dynamic phenotypes that require joint interpretation of measurements, models, and experimental design.
SN  - 2296-889X
ER  -