Wall-to-Lumen Ratio Estimation in Adaptive Optics Retinal Imaging: Evaluation and Comparison.
- 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 2Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
- 3Germany Medical Informatics Center - Department of Medical Data Science, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
Purpose
Retinal arteriolar changes reflect systemic microvascular alterations associated with cardiovascular risk, including hypertension. The retinal arteriolar wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR), obtained by adaptive optics (AO) imaging, is a promising noninvasive biomarker of early vascular damage. Its clinical utility is limited by inter- and intra-grader variability, lack of standardized protocols, and dependence on image quality, boundary definition, and measurement method. Standardized, objective WLR quantification is therefore needed to minimize observer bias and improve reproducibility.Methods
We compared point-based and region-based manual WLR estimation using 60 high-resolution AO images from 35 healthy subjects. Two experienced graders performed five point-based measurements per image, yielding one median WLR, followed by manual artery wall and lumen segmentation, yielding one WLR value. Inter-grader variability, method agreement, and sampling-location requirements were evaluated using statistical and Bland-Altman analyses.Results
Point-based assessment showed good inter-grader agreement, with a relative mean difference of 4.5% (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.05). Region-based assessment produced significantly lower WLR values than the point-based method (P < 0.01), with relative mean differences of 19.9% and 26.1% for graders A and B, respectively. Inter-grader relative mean difference was 6.2%, comparable to the point-based method. Approximately 10 measurement positions reduced the estimation error to about 5%; fewer positions increased error. Image quality and vessel-border visibility affected WLR variability.Conclusions
WLR estimation is influenced by measurement approach, grader experience, image quality, and sampling density. Although region-based assessment is more comprehensive, it is time-consuming. For clinical point-based assessment, at least 10 clearly visible arterial locations are recommended to minimize estimation error. Standardized protocols are essential for reliable WLR quantification.Translational relevance
For standardized manual WLR assessment in AO retinal images, we recommend measuring only clearly visible vessel segments, using double-sided measurements whenever possible, avoiding bifurcations, crossings, and adjacent vessels, obtaining ≥12 measurements per artery, excluding the upper and lower deciles, and reporting the median of ≥10 remaining measurements as the final WLR.
Related
- Use of a Retinal Phantom to Facilitate Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy Imaging in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
- Diabetic retinal neurovascular unit injury: mechanisms, imaging evaluation, and integrated therapeutic strategies
- Test-time neural style transfer for domain harmonization, with application to cone detection in adaptive optics retinal imaging
- Evaluation of Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer in patients with glaucoma and comparison with normal population.
- Retinal layer thickness prediction from smartphone fundus imaging for early glaucoma detection
BibTeX
@article{kolar2026walltolumen,
title = {{Wall-to-Lumen Ratio Estimation in Adaptive Optics Retinal Imaging: Evaluation and Comparison.}},
author = {Radim Kolar and Roman Jakubicek and Eva Orsagova and Jan Odstrcilik and Franziska G Rauscher},
journal = {Translational vision science \& technology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1167/tvst.15.10.26},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42885982},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Wall-to-Lumen Ratio Estimation in Adaptive Optics Retinal Imaging: Evaluation and Comparison.
AU - Radim Kolar
AU - Roman Jakubicek
AU - Eva Orsagova
AU - Jan Odstrcilik
AU - Franziska G Rauscher
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Translational vision science & technology
DO - 10.1167/tvst.15.10.26
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42885982
AB - Purpose Retinal arteriolar changes reflect systemic microvascular alterations associated with cardiovascular risk, including hypertension. The retinal arteriolar wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR), obtained by adaptive optics (AO) imaging, is a promising noninvasive biomarker of early vascular damage. Its clinical utility is limited by inter- and intra-grader variability, lack of standardized protocols, and dependence on image quality, boundary definition, and measurement method. Standardized, objective WLR quantification is therefore needed to minimize observer bias and improve reproducibility.Methods We compared point-based and region-based manual WLR estimation using 60 high-resolution AO images from 35 healthy subjects. Two experienced graders performed five point-based measurements per image, yielding one median WLR, followed by manual artery wall and lumen segmentation, yielding one WLR value. Inter-grader variability, method agreement, and sampling-location requirements were evaluated using statistical and Bland-Altman analyses.Results Point-based assessment showed good inter-grader agreement, with a relative mean difference of 4.5% (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.05). Region-based assessment produced significantly lower WLR values than the point-based method (P < 0.01), with relative mean differences of 19.9% and 26.1% for graders A and B, respectively. Inter-grader relative mean difference was 6.2%, comparable to the point-based method. Approximately 10 measurement positions reduced the estimation error to about 5%; fewer positions increased error. Image quality and vessel-border visibility affected WLR variability.Conclusions WLR estimation is influenced by measurement approach, grader experience, image quality, and sampling density. Although region-based assessment is more comprehensive, it is time-consuming. For clinical point-based assessment, at least 10 clearly visible arterial locations are recommended to minimize estimation error. Standardized protocols are essential for reliable WLR quantification.Translational relevance For standardized manual WLR assessment in AO retinal images, we recommend measuring only clearly visible vessel segments, using double-sided measurements whenever possible, avoiding bifurcations, crossings, and adjacent vessels, obtaining ≥12 measurements per artery, excluding the upper and lower deciles, and reporting the median of ≥10 remaining measurements as the final WLR.
SN - 2164-2591
ER -