Dynamic Amplification of Risk-Estimate Bias Through Differential Detection: A Markov Model for History-Based Covariates
Abstract
History-based risk factors, such as known family history, recorded personal history, and documented regional history, are often treated as covariates. Because these variables depend on testing, diagnosis, and recording, their observed values are influenced by detection. However, monitoring data are often unavailable, making it difficult to distinguish true history effects from detection-driven associations. We study the feedback loop that arises when observed history affects future monitoring and future monitoring affects which histories become observed. Prostate cancer screening serves as a case in point: knowing a family history may raise awareness and increase testing compared with having no known history. We develop Markov models for true and observed history states and show that differential detection can distort both observed risk ratios and the distribution of the observed history variable, and can create an apparent history effect even when true event risk does not depend on history. With history-dependent true risk, the observed history process is generally not Markovian, although the joint true-observed process is. Uniform incomplete detection can attenuate true history effects by shifting individuals with missed events into less recent observed-history states. We also develop an inverse sensitivity-analysis framework that combines a published observed association, a baseline event probability, and plausible detection probabilities to obtain the implied true risk contrast. Numerical analyses illustrate the distortions, and a prostate cancer family-history example demonstrates the sensitivity calculation using external calibration values. The framework is intended for registry, electronic health record, and surveillance studies that use documented history as a risk factor.
Related
- Robust Community Detection for Noisy Networks with Covariates: Application to Functional Brain Networks
- Augmented Patient Preference Incorporated Reinforcement Learning (APP-RL) to Estimate the Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regime
- The Cost of Differential Privacy in Linear-Quadratic Dynamic Games
- Differential Geometric Signatures of Persistent Structural Transitions in Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure via Bézier Representations
- On The Relevance Of Using Temperature For Mechanical Fault Detection In Industrial Robots Based On Dynamic Modeling
BibTeX
@misc{sharvit2026dynamic,
title = {{Dynamic Amplification of Risk-Estimate Bias Through Differential Detection: A Markov Model for History-Based Covariates}},
author = {Hadar Sharvit and Micha Mandel},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.12376},
eprint = {2609.12376},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12376},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Dynamic Amplification of Risk-Estimate Bias Through Differential Detection: A Markov Model for History-Based Covariates
AU - Hadar Sharvit
AU - Micha Mandel
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/11
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.12376
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12376
AB - History-based risk factors, such as known family history, recorded personal history, and documented regional history, are often treated as covariates. Because these variables depend on testing, diagnosis, and recording, their observed values are influenced by detection. However, monitoring data are often unavailable, making it difficult to distinguish true history effects from detection-driven associations. We study the feedback loop that arises when observed history affects future monitoring and future monitoring affects which histories become observed. Prostate cancer screening serves as a case in point: knowing a family history may raise awareness and increase testing compared with having no known history. We develop Markov models for true and observed history states and show that differential detection can distort both observed risk ratios and the distribution of the observed history variable, and can create an apparent history effect even when true event risk does not depend on history. With history-dependent true risk, the observed history process is generally not Markovian, although the joint true-observed process is. Uniform incomplete detection can attenuate true history effects by shifting individuals with missed events into less recent observed-history states. We also develop an inverse sensitivity-analysis framework that combines a published observed association, a baseline event probability, and plausible detection probabilities to obtain the implied true risk contrast. Numerical analyses illustrate the distortions, and a prostate cancer family-history example demonstrates the sensitivity calculation using external calibration values. The framework is intended for registry, electronic health record, and surveillance studies that use documented history as a risk factor.
ER -