Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,688 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Multi-dimensional structure and subtype-specific heterogeneity of angiogenesis in breast cancer

  1. 1Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
  2. 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
  3. 3Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Abstract

Background: The prognostic relevance of angiogenesis in breast cancer remains unclear when modeled as a coordinated gene program rather than individual gene effects. This study aimed to characterize the multidimensional structure of angiogenesis and assess the prognostic relevance of its latent components for overall survival in breast cancer. Methods: Using RNA sequencing data from 1,096 patients with The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) from the United States, we summarized 36 angiogenesis-related genes via principal component analysis (PCA) applied to standardized log-counts per million values. The first three components (Z1−Z3), retained based on variance explained, scree plot inspection, and interpretable gene loading patterns, were evaluated for association with overall survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and molecular subtype. Results: The first three components captured a multi-dimensional structure of angiogenesis activity. None was significantly associated with overall survival in multivariable Cox models (Z1: HR = 1.016, 95% CI: 0.957–1.078, p = 0.603; Z2: HR = 1.049, 95% CI: 0.954–1.153, p = 0.319; Z3: HR = 1.007, 95% CI: 0.918–1.105, p = 0.878), and Kaplan–Meier analyses showed no significant survival differences across median-based groups. Functional enrichment analyses indicated that the retained components represented distinct biological dimensions of angiogenesis. Subtype-specific analyses showed no statistically significant associations within individual subtypes and no strong evidence of effect modification. However, marked differences in latent component distributions across molecular subtypes revealed substantial subtype-specific heterogeneity. Collectively, these findings indicate limited independent prognostic relevance for overall survival despite substantial biological heterogeneity and subtype-specific variation. Conclusions: Angiogenesis is a multi-dimensional and biologically heterogeneous process. No latent angiogenesis component demonstrated independent prognostic value for overall survival, indicating that angiogenesis is insufficient as a standalone prognostic biomarker. Nevertheless, subtype-specific variation across latent dimensions highlights its relevance for understanding biological heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Related

  1. Subtype-Specific Aptamer Technologies for Breast Cancer: From Molecular Recognition to Precision Applications.
    Huibin Wu, Zhi Zeng, Wenyi Huang +4
    BiosensorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  2. Molecular Determinants of G Protein Subtype-Specific Coupling to the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor
    A. A. Acheampong, M. K. Collins, A. R. Keller +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  3. To mix or to de-mix?: Cation-π suppresses heterogeneity in local structure and dynamics of heterotypic Condensates
    S. Roy, D. Sharma, M. K. HAZRA
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  4. DeCoRE: A computational method to resolve RNA structural heterogeneity from RNA structure probing data by direct RNA sequencing
    Yong Huang, Jinsong Zhang, Lei Sun +1
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  5. Native Mass Spectrometry Reveals Ligand-Specific Conformational Heterogeneity of the β1-Adrenergic Receptor Using Nanobody Probes.
    Yi-Quan Wang, Guan-Ting Lian, Yi-An Chen +4
    Analytical chemistryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{baidoo2026multidimensional,
  title = {{Multi-dimensional structure and subtype-specific heterogeneity of angiogenesis in breast cancer}},
  author = {Dennis Baidoo},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0348390},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348390},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Multi-dimensional structure and subtype-specific heterogeneity of angiogenesis in breast cancer
AU  - Dennis Baidoo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0348390
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348390
AB  - Background: The prognostic relevance of angiogenesis in breast cancer remains unclear when modeled as a coordinated gene program rather than individual gene effects. This study aimed to characterize the multidimensional structure of angiogenesis and assess the prognostic relevance of its latent components for overall survival in breast cancer. Methods: Using RNA sequencing data from 1,096 patients with The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) from the United States, we summarized 36 angiogenesis-related genes via principal component analysis (PCA) applied to standardized log-counts per million values. The first three components (Z1−Z3), retained based on variance explained, scree plot inspection, and interpretable gene loading patterns, were evaluated for association with overall survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and molecular subtype. Results: The first three components captured a multi-dimensional structure of angiogenesis activity. None was significantly associated with overall survival in multivariable Cox models (Z1: HR = 1.016, 95% CI: 0.957–1.078, p = 0.603; Z2: HR = 1.049, 95% CI: 0.954–1.153, p = 0.319; Z3: HR = 1.007, 95% CI: 0.918–1.105, p = 0.878), and Kaplan–Meier analyses showed no significant survival differences across median-based groups. Functional enrichment analyses indicated that the retained components represented distinct biological dimensions of angiogenesis. Subtype-specific analyses showed no statistically significant associations within individual subtypes and no strong evidence of effect modification. However, marked differences in latent component distributions across molecular subtypes revealed substantial subtype-specific heterogeneity. Collectively, these findings indicate limited independent prognostic relevance for overall survival despite substantial biological heterogeneity and subtype-specific variation. Conclusions: Angiogenesis is a multi-dimensional and biologically heterogeneous process. No latent angiogenesis component demonstrated independent prognostic value for overall survival, indicating that angiogenesis is insufficient as a standalone prognostic biomarker. Nevertheless, subtype-specific variation across latent dimensions highlights its relevance for understanding biological heterogeneity in breast cancer.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -