Liquid Biopsy and Multi‐Cancer Early Detection Tests for Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review
4 affiliations
- 1Division of Prevention & Screening, Population and Community‐Based Care Ontario Health Toronto Ontario Canada
- 2Dalla Lana School of Public Health University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
- 3Department of Medicine Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
- 4Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
Abstract
Liquid biopsy constitutes a range of tests that use biological fluids to detect cancer. Research is now targeting their use for cancer screening. This is the first review of the evidence on liquid biopsy tests across a range of analytical parameters, biomarkers, and cancer types for cancer screening. A scoping review was conducted using JBI methodology for scoping reviews. MEDLINE and targeted websites were searched for studies published in 2014 or later on the use of liquid biopsy and multi‐cancer early detection tests for screening. A total of 104 studies were included, covering a wide range of study designs. Several types of biomarkers (e.g., cell‐free DNA, circulating tumor DNA) and analytical parameters were used. Most studies addressed test performance outcomes, while fewer addressed clinical outcomes, implementation considerations, and cost‐effectiveness. No empirical studies on cancer‐specific mortality were found. A large body of literature was identified that covered a range of cancer types, biomarkers, analytical parameters, and outcomes. Critical gaps in the literature were demonstrated, including evidence on clinical outcomes such as cancer‐specific mortality and potential harms that currently preclude the implementation of liquid biopsy tests for cancer screening. Findings of this review can be used to guide the necessary future research.
Related
- Clinical translation of liquid biopsy in early cancer screening: biofluid selection, model construction, and clinical validation
- Refining Lung Cancer Care: The Emerging Role of Liquid Biopsy in Screening, Diagnosis, and Precision Oncology.
- Novel liquid biopsy based on comprehensive small RNA profiling for screening of cancer in dogs utilizing machine learning.
- Multiomic liquid biopsy: emerging applications in disease quantification, biomarker detection, molecular phenotyping, and cancer signal of origin prediction
- Exhaled Breath Analysis for Lung Cancer Detection: From VOCs Signatures to EBC-Based Liquid Biopsy and Clinical Translation.
BibTeX
@article{robinson2026liquid,
title = {{Liquid Biopsy and Multi‐Cancer Early Detection Tests for Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review}},
author = {Tessa Robinson and Marian Saab and Lily Thao Nguyen and Pooja Kochar and Olivia Meggetto and Jill Tinmouth and Meghan J. Walker},
journal = {Clinical Genetics},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1111/cge.70249},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.70249},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Liquid Biopsy and Multi‐Cancer Early Detection Tests for Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review
AU - Tessa Robinson
AU - Marian Saab
AU - Lily Thao Nguyen
AU - Pooja Kochar
AU - Olivia Meggetto
AU - Jill Tinmouth
AU - Meghan J. Walker
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
JO - Clinical Genetics
DO - 10.1111/cge.70249
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.70249
AB - Liquid biopsy constitutes a range of tests that use biological fluids to detect cancer. Research is now targeting their use for cancer screening. This is the first review of the evidence on liquid biopsy tests across a range of analytical parameters, biomarkers, and cancer types for cancer screening. A scoping review was conducted using JBI methodology for scoping reviews. MEDLINE and targeted websites were searched for studies published in 2014 or later on the use of liquid biopsy and multi‐cancer early detection tests for screening. A total of 104 studies were included, covering a wide range of study designs. Several types of biomarkers (e.g., cell‐free DNA, circulating tumor DNA) and analytical parameters were used. Most studies addressed test performance outcomes, while fewer addressed clinical outcomes, implementation considerations, and cost‐effectiveness. No empirical studies on cancer‐specific mortality were found. A large body of literature was identified that covered a range of cancer types, biomarkers, analytical parameters, and outcomes. Critical gaps in the literature were demonstrated, including evidence on clinical outcomes such as cancer‐specific mortality and potential harms that currently preclude the implementation of liquid biopsy tests for cancer screening. Findings of this review can be used to guide the necessary future research.
SN - 0009-9163
SN - 1399-0004
ER -