Does the goal of food security hinder the agricultural green and low-carbon transformation? Evidence from China.
4 affiliations
- 1School of Economics and Management/Key Laboratory of Digital Empowerment Economic Development, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China.
- 2College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210014, Jiangsu, China.
- 3School of Economics and Management/Key Laboratory of Digital Empowerment Economic Development, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China. [email protected].
- 4School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518172, Guangdong, China.
Abstract
Agricultural production is crucial to food security and the realization of carbon reduction targets. Whether green and low-carbon development of agriculture can be achieved on the basis of ensuring food security is a common challenge faced by all economies. This study takes China's 2004 designation of 13 major grain-producing areas as a quasi-natural experiment. Using provincial panel data from 2000 to 2022, a difference-in-differences model is constructed to explore if the policy can boost green transformation while ensuring yield growth. The findings reveal that the policy significantly reduces carbon emissions and agricultural non-point source pollution, with robustness confirmed by placebo tests, PSM-DID, and double machine learning. Crop structure adjustment and green technological progress have been identified as two key channels for promoting carbon reduction effects, among which labor force transfer plays a non-linear moderating role. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that excessive concentration of grain production is detrimental to the reduction and control of agricultural pollution, while the pollution reduction effect of the policy is more pronounced in regions with moderate to high levels of labor aging. It is recommended to further encourage appropriately scaled operations, promote the application and innovation of green agricultural technologies, and tailor strategies to local conditions to achieve agricultural green transformation, while continuing to uphold the major grain-producing areas policy.
Related
- Women’s subsistence agricultural employment and its dual association with rural children’s food security in Iran
- Low-carbon technologies support energy security by buffering energy price shocks
- Soil Carbon Stocks and Radiocarbon Profiles in Three Agricultural Systems of California’s Central Valley
- Insight from Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Fractionation of Sulfamethoxazole during Oxidative vs Reductive Transformation.
- The agricultural synergistic dividend of environmental regulation and the identification of the net total effect: Evidence from China’s Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan
BibTeX
@article{ma2026does,
title = {{Does the goal of food security hinder the agricultural green and low-carbon transformation? Evidence from China.}},
author = {Guoqun Ma and Zhiyu Qin and Lihao Yao and Ziqi Mou},
journal = {Carbon balance and management},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s13021-026-00490-w},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42955556},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Does the goal of food security hinder the agricultural green and low-carbon transformation? Evidence from China.
AU - Guoqun Ma
AU - Zhiyu Qin
AU - Lihao Yao
AU - Ziqi Mou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/26
JO - Carbon balance and management
DO - 10.1186/s13021-026-00490-w
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42955556
AB - Agricultural production is crucial to food security and the realization of carbon reduction targets. Whether green and low-carbon development of agriculture can be achieved on the basis of ensuring food security is a common challenge faced by all economies. This study takes China's 2004 designation of 13 major grain-producing areas as a quasi-natural experiment. Using provincial panel data from 2000 to 2022, a difference-in-differences model is constructed to explore if the policy can boost green transformation while ensuring yield growth. The findings reveal that the policy significantly reduces carbon emissions and agricultural non-point source pollution, with robustness confirmed by placebo tests, PSM-DID, and double machine learning. Crop structure adjustment and green technological progress have been identified as two key channels for promoting carbon reduction effects, among which labor force transfer plays a non-linear moderating role. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that excessive concentration of grain production is detrimental to the reduction and control of agricultural pollution, while the pollution reduction effect of the policy is more pronounced in regions with moderate to high levels of labor aging. It is recommended to further encourage appropriately scaled operations, promote the application and innovation of green agricultural technologies, and tailor strategies to local conditions to achieve agricultural green transformation, while continuing to uphold the major grain-producing areas policy.
SN - 1750-0680
ER -