Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Pain state-dependent multimodal assessment in non-specific low back pain: a pseudorandomized study design with implementation insights

  1. 1Integrative Spinal Research, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Z

Abstract

BackgroundFluctuations in pain intensity are intrinsic to non-specific chronic low back pain (nsCLBP). Nevertheless, pain fluctuations have rarely been considered when investigating pathophysiological mechanisms. Therefore, a novel study protocol was developed and implemented to systematically assess the impact of fluctuating pain states on pain-related measures.

MethodsThe final study cohort consisted of 45 nsCLBP patients and 47 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Patients participated in three visits, conducted during different pain states (i.e. clinically relevant pain, low-intensity clinical pain / pain-free, clinically irrelevant pain induced using a Qutenza 8% capsaicin patch). Pain fluctuations were monitored through online assessments every four days and guided the pseudorandomized visit scheduling. HCs participated in a single visit. Each study visit comprised a multimodal battery of pain-related measures.

Results93.33% of patients completed all three visit types in a pseudorandomized order ({chi}{superscript 2}=1.50, p=0.826). Visit scheduling was possible due to the high self-report adherence (median=93.48%), unrelated to self-report burden ({rho}=-0.097, p=0.53). Study visits were conducted during different pain states, as indicated by: i) the significantly higher low back pain intensity in the clinically relevant pain visit (mean[SD]: 3.98[0.90]), compared to the low-intensity clinical pain (1.03[0.86]) and clinically irrelevant pain (1.13[0.82]) visits (p-values<0.001), as well as by ii) the successful induction of a moderate-to-high clinically irrelevant pain across assessments.

ConclusionDespite scheduling complexity and pain state transition uncertainty, a pain state-dependent pseudorandomized study design is feasible and could improve the understanding of nsCLBP mechanisms.

Related

  1. Nationwide Implementation of Multimodal Prehabilitation and Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Charissa R. Sabajo, David W.G. ten Cate, Susan van Grinsven +22
    JAMA SurgeryPeer-reviewedLicence not stated10 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaOpenAlex
  2. Site‐Specific Characterization and Quantification of Facial Corticosteroid Addiction Dermatitis: A Multimodal Nomogram Integrating High‐Frequency Ultrasonography and Transepidermal Water Loss
    Jun Wang, Ji Tao Gui, Rong Yu +3
    Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Multimodal urban park service accessibility and spatial distributional inequality through a multiscale assessment
    Pengjun Wu, Minghua Liu, Zhongwei Wang +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  4. A Reduced Digital Motor Assessment using Multimodal Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease
    J. Rey Vilches, T. H. Thomsen, B. Biering-Sorensen +2
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurologymedRxiv
  5. Implementation and Evaluation of the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol in an Arabic-Speaking Population: The Lebanon Study on Aging and Health (LSAHA)
    M. Elbejjani, K. El Asmar, M. Chaaya +6
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{barrientos2026pain,
  title = {{Pain state-dependent multimodal assessment in non-specific low back pain: a pseudorandomized study design with implementation insights}},
  author = {B. Chozas Barrientos and M. Hau and L. Sirucek and A. Langenfeld and M. Wehrli and B. Wirth and N. Zoelch and J. Devan and S. Dudli and P. Schweinhardt},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.08.26.26359760},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.26.26359760v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Pain state-dependent multimodal assessment in non-specific low back pain: a pseudorandomized study design with implementation insights
AU  - B. Chozas Barrientos
AU  - M. Hau
AU  - L. Sirucek
AU  - A. Langenfeld
AU  - M. Wehrli
AU  - B. Wirth
AU  - N. Zoelch
AU  - J. Devan
AU  - S. Dudli
AU  - P. Schweinhardt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/26
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.08.26.26359760
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.26.26359760v1
AB  - BackgroundFluctuations in pain intensity are intrinsic to non-specific chronic low back pain (nsCLBP). Nevertheless, pain fluctuations have rarely been considered when investigating pathophysiological mechanisms. Therefore, a novel study protocol was developed and implemented to systematically assess the impact of fluctuating pain states on pain-related measures.  MethodsThe final study cohort consisted of 45 nsCLBP patients and 47 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Patients participated in three visits, conducted during different pain states (i.e. clinically relevant pain, low-intensity clinical pain / pain-free, clinically irrelevant pain induced using a Qutenza 8% capsaicin patch). Pain fluctuations were monitored through online assessments every four days and guided the pseudorandomized visit scheduling. HCs participated in a single visit. Each study visit comprised a multimodal battery of pain-related measures.  Results93.33% of patients completed all three visit types in a pseudorandomized order ({chi}{superscript 2}=1.50, p=0.826). Visit scheduling was possible due to the high self-report adherence (median=93.48%), unrelated to self-report burden ({rho}=-0.097, p=0.53). Study visits were conducted during different pain states, as indicated by: i) the significantly higher low back pain intensity in the clinically relevant pain visit (mean[SD]: 3.98[0.90]), compared to the low-intensity clinical pain (1.03[0.86]) and clinically irrelevant pain (1.13[0.82]) visits (p-values<0.001), as well as by ii) the successful induction of a moderate-to-high clinically irrelevant pain across assessments.  ConclusionDespite scheduling complexity and pain state transition uncertainty, a pain state-dependent pseudorandomized study design is feasible and could improve the understanding of nsCLBP mechanisms.
ER  -