Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,970 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

Effects of cognitively engaging physical activity on peer relationships among adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial exploring the roles of executive function and cognitive reappraisal

Abstract

Background: Peer relationships are an important indicator of adolescents’ school-based mental health and social adjustment, but experimental evidence on whether cognitively engaging physical activity (CEPA) improves them remains limited. This trial tested the effect of a CEPA curriculum on peer relationships relative to a traditional physical education curriculum (TPEC), with exploratory pathways through executive function and cognitive reappraisal.

Methods: In this parallel two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial, 12 intact classes comprising 650 students in grades 10 and 11 from three urban public high schools in eastern China were randomly assigned within school-by-grade strata to 12 weeks of CEPA or TPEC (three 45-min sessions per week; six classes per arm). The primary outcome was the posttest total peer relationship score; secondary outcomes were executive function and cognitive reappraisal. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle, using linear mixed models with class random intercepts and multiple imputation; serial mediation was examined in exploratory analyses with Monte Carlo confidence intervals.

Results: 650 students entered baseline assessment (CEPA, 327; TPEC, 323) and 612 (94.2%) completed the posttest. CEPA improved peer relationships relative to TPEC (between-group difference, 4.39 points; 95% CI, 0.64 to 8.13; d = 0.38; p = 0.029). Between-group differences for executive function (2.28; 95% CI, − 0.22 to 4.79; d = 0.35) and cognitive reappraisal (1.38; 95% CI, − 0.13 to 2.90; d = 0.36) were not statistically significant after Holm correction. Exploratory indirect-effect estimates through executive function, cognitive reappraisal, and their serial pathway were positive, with 95% confidence intervals that included zero. The primary result was consistent across sensitivity analyses, and observed contamination in TPEC classes was 2.3% of sessions.

Conclusions: A 12-week CEPA curriculum improved adolescents’ peer relationships relative to traditional physical education. Executive function and cognitive reappraisal remain candidate pathways for further testing. CEPA offers a practical approach within routine school physical education.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500114337 (retrospectively registered 10 December 2025).

Related

  1. Evaluating the efficacy of a single preemptive dose of ketorolac or paracetamol for managing orthodontic procedure pain in adolescents – A randomized controlled trial
    Yatishkumar S. Joshi, Disha Limbraj Khandade, Suresh K. Kangane +4
    SRM Journal of Research in Dental SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. A pilot randomized controlled trial of an integrative psychotherapy incorporating an attachment-based approach for adolescents with cannabis use disorder (TIMCA).
    Bou Nassif Yara, Richter Joachim, Kheirallah Lana +6
    Addictive behaviors reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Figure Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Improve Adherence Barriers for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
    Avani C. Modi, Constance A. Mara, Holly O’Donnell +12
    The Journal of pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  4. Effects of exercise interventions on executive function in adolescents: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dongying Li, Shixian Li, Min Yao +4
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossref
  5. Effects of exercise interventions on fundamental motor skills in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis with meta-regression analyses of randomized controlled trials
    Jiangdi Su, Liang Li, Yuchen Wang +1
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{xu2026effects,
  title = {{Effects of cognitively engaging physical activity on peer relationships among adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial exploring the roles of executive function and cognitive reappraisal}},
  author = {Yifan Xu and Yifan Shi and Kaiqiang Zhong and Wanqi Zhang and Wange Wang and Shimeng Wang},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-30161-x},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-30161-x},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effects of cognitively engaging physical activity on peer relationships among adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial exploring the roles of executive function and cognitive reappraisal
AU  - Yifan Xu
AU  - Yifan Shi
AU  - Kaiqiang Zhong
AU  - Wanqi Zhang
AU  - Wange Wang
AU  - Shimeng Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-30161-x
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-30161-x
AB  - Background: Peer relationships are an important indicator of adolescents’ school-based mental health and social adjustment, but experimental evidence on whether cognitively engaging physical activity (CEPA) improves them remains limited. This trial tested the effect of a CEPA curriculum on peer relationships relative to a traditional physical education curriculum (TPEC), with exploratory pathways through executive function and cognitive reappraisal.  Methods: In this parallel two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial, 12 intact classes comprising 650 students in grades 10 and 11 from three urban public high schools in eastern China were randomly assigned within school-by-grade strata to 12 weeks of CEPA or TPEC (three 45-min sessions per week; six classes per arm). The primary outcome was the posttest total peer relationship score; secondary outcomes were executive function and cognitive reappraisal. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle, using linear mixed models with class random intercepts and multiple imputation; serial mediation was examined in exploratory analyses with Monte Carlo confidence intervals.  Results: 650 students entered baseline assessment (CEPA, 327; TPEC, 323) and 612 (94.2%) completed the posttest. CEPA improved peer relationships relative to TPEC (between-group difference, 4.39 points; 95% CI, 0.64 to 8.13; d = 0.38; p = 0.029). Between-group differences for executive function (2.28; 95% CI, − 0.22 to 4.79; d = 0.35) and cognitive reappraisal (1.38; 95% CI, − 0.13 to 2.90; d = 0.36) were not statistically significant after Holm correction. Exploratory indirect-effect estimates through executive function, cognitive reappraisal, and their serial pathway were positive, with 95% confidence intervals that included zero. The primary result was consistent across sensitivity analyses, and observed contamination in TPEC classes was 2.3% of sessions.  Conclusions: A 12-week CEPA curriculum improved adolescents’ peer relationships relative to traditional physical education. Executive function and cognitive reappraisal remain candidate pathways for further testing. CEPA offers a practical approach within routine school physical education.  Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500114337 (retrospectively registered 10 December 2025).
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -