Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Acceptability, Safety and Feasibility of a Sedentary Behaviour Intervention (REACH-SCI) in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study

  1. 1City St George's, University of London

Abstract

PurposeIndividuals with paraplegia often have high levels of sedentary behaviour, which increases cardiovascular disease risk. This study assessed the acceptability, safety and feasibility of a sedentary behaviour intervention (REACH-SCI) in individuals with paraplegia.

Materials and methodsA pre-post feasibility study was conducted in wheelchair-users with paraplegia (n=18) to evaluate an 8-week intervention comprised of a wearable activity tracker, educational booklet, goal setting, motivational support sessions, peer support and activity tools (Trial registration: NCT06957483). Acceptability was assessed via semi-structured interviews and questionnaires, safety via adverse events, pain and fatigue, and intervention feasibility via components being delivered as intended. Intervention engagement and preliminary efficacy were also assessed.

ResultsThe intervention and study procedures were acceptable and safe, intervention components were delivered as planned, and the study was feasible in terms of participant recruitment, retention and data completion rates. Engagement with intervention components was generally high, except for peer support. The intervention demonstrated preliminary efficacy for improving sedentary behaviour, physical activity, cardiovascular disease biomarkers and psychosocial outcomes.

ConclusionsAn intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in individuals with paraplegia was acceptable, safe and feasible. The effectiveness of REACH-SCI should be evaluated in a definitive trial to inform clinical care and public health guidelines.

Related

  1. Does a digital support intervention reduce sedentary behaviour during cancer treatment in individuals with breast, prostate or colorectal cancer? Study protocol for a Swedish multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Lisa Rådman, Johanna Zetterlund, Petra von Heideken Wågert +1
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefPMC
  2. Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Digital Cognitive Intervention for Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC) in Older Adults
    Cutter A. Lindbergh, Roger Altizer, James J. Grady +3
    The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric PsychiatryPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurologyPMC
  3. Feasibility and acceptability of an environmental volunteering intervention conducted in Malta among adults with obesity and concurrent mental health conditions
    Paul Calleja, Paquito Bernard, Ahmed Jérôme Romain +4
    Environmental Research: HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyHAL
  4. Feasibility, acceptability and usability of InControl web-platform intervention for older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A mixed-methods pilot study protocol
    David Oliveira, Nelson P. Rocha, Anabela G. Silva
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClinical trials & evidence synthesisPLOS
  5. Mental health of preadolescents in western Ukraine: feasibility and acceptability of a school-based psychosocial intervention during war
    Oleksandr Avramchuk, Olha Germanovych, Olha Ivanenko +6
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@misc{cooper2026acceptability,
  title = {{Acceptability, Safety and Feasibility of a Sedentary Behaviour Intervention (REACH-SCI) in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study}},
  author = {D. L. Cooper and A. Warland and E. Norris and C. Kilbride and S. Paddison and B. D. Maylor and K. A. Finlay and L. Ferrandino and D. P. Bailey},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.21.26365989},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.26365989v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Acceptability, Safety and Feasibility of a Sedentary Behaviour Intervention (REACH-SCI) in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study
AU  - D. L. Cooper
AU  - A. Warland
AU  - E. Norris
AU  - C. Kilbride
AU  - S. Paddison
AU  - B. D. Maylor
AU  - K. A. Finlay
AU  - L. Ferrandino
AU  - D. P. Bailey
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.21.26365989
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.26365989v1
AB  - PurposeIndividuals with paraplegia often have high levels of sedentary behaviour, which increases cardiovascular disease risk. This study assessed the acceptability, safety and feasibility of a sedentary behaviour intervention (REACH-SCI) in individuals with paraplegia.  Materials and methodsA pre-post feasibility study was conducted in wheelchair-users with paraplegia (n=18) to evaluate an 8-week intervention comprised of a wearable activity tracker, educational booklet, goal setting, motivational support sessions, peer support and activity tools (Trial registration: NCT06957483). Acceptability was assessed via semi-structured interviews and questionnaires, safety via adverse events, pain and fatigue, and intervention feasibility via components being delivered as intended. Intervention engagement and preliminary efficacy were also assessed.  ResultsThe intervention and study procedures were acceptable and safe, intervention components were delivered as planned, and the study was feasible in terms of participant recruitment, retention and data completion rates. Engagement with intervention components was generally high, except for peer support. The intervention demonstrated preliminary efficacy for improving sedentary behaviour, physical activity, cardiovascular disease biomarkers and psychosocial outcomes.  ConclusionsAn intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in individuals with paraplegia was acceptable, safe and feasible. The effectiveness of REACH-SCI should be evaluated in a definitive trial to inform clinical care and public health guidelines.
ER  -