Perceived time in the presence of others: Further arguments for an attentional view of social facilitation
Abstract
Although the effects of the presence of others on behavior constitute one of the oldest topics studied in social psychology, the reason why these effects occur is still the subject of scientific debate. Three hypotheses are commonly cited: (1) the presence of others facilitates dominant responses by increasing arousal, (2) it captures attention, or (3) it increases the efforts of those being observed. Few studies have attempted to distinguish between these explanations, and those that have done so have used a specific paradigm: the Stroop task. In the present study, we proposed an alternative approach based on the use of the temporal bisection task. In three studies, the bisection results showed a temporal shortening effect in social presence (that of an experimenter) consistent with an attentional distraction-related effect. Our results also provided the first evidence that this effect may be stronger when the attentional conflict between the task and the presence is unimodal (e.g., visual task and visual presence) rather than cross-modal (e.g., auditive task and visual presence). They also suggested that the social presence effect might be similar to that produced by a mechanical distractor, although the social nature of the distractor increased the attention-related effect. We discuss how variations in the presence and behavior of the experimenter could contribute to the difficulty of replicating certain studies in experimental psychology, given that the social presence of the experimenter is generally assumed to be innocuous.
Related
- Predictive coding unifies neural and behavioral signatures of contextual facilitation
- Facilitation and Attenuation of Learning to Novel and Familiar Stimuli Through Contextual Mismatch: Experimental Evidence and a Computational Model
- Abrogation of presynaptic facilitation at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses disrupts neural ensemble activity and spatial memory
- Divergent Root and Shoot Trait Strategies Shape Competition–Facilitation Shifts Between Conspecific and Heterospecific Neighbors Under Contrasting Soil Moisture Conditions
- LLM-Based Extraction of Clinical Practice Guidelines into Structured Arguments
BibTeX
@article{belletier2026perceived,
title = {{Perceived time in the presence of others: Further arguments for an attentional view of social facilitation}},
author = {C. Belletier and P. Huguet and L. Ferrand and S. Droit-Volet},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104997},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05737959v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Perceived time in the presence of others: Further arguments for an attentional view of social facilitation
AU - C. Belletier
AU - P. Huguet
AU - L. Ferrand
AU - S. Droit-Volet
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/03
JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104997
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05737959v1
AB - Although the effects of the presence of others on behavior constitute one of the oldest topics studied in social psychology, the reason why these effects occur is still the subject of scientific debate. Three hypotheses are commonly cited: (1) the presence of others facilitates dominant responses by increasing arousal, (2) it captures attention, or (3) it increases the efforts of those being observed. Few studies have attempted to distinguish between these explanations, and those that have done so have used a specific paradigm: the Stroop task. In the present study, we proposed an alternative approach based on the use of the temporal bisection task. In three studies, the bisection results showed a temporal shortening effect in social presence (that of an experimenter) consistent with an attentional distraction-related effect. Our results also provided the first evidence that this effect may be stronger when the attentional conflict between the task and the presence is unimodal (e.g., visual task and visual presence) rather than cross-modal (e.g., auditive task and visual presence). They also suggested that the social presence effect might be similar to that produced by a mechanical distractor, although the social nature of the distractor increased the attention-related effect. We discuss how variations in the presence and behavior of the experimenter could contribute to the difficulty of replicating certain studies in experimental psychology, given that the social presence of the experimenter is generally assumed to be innocuous.
SN - 0022-1031
SN - 1096-0465
ER -