Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism

Dietary protein content and its impact on amino acid profile and appetite in patients with methylmalonic acidemia

  1. 1Division of Pediatric Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.
  2. 2Ankara University Rare Diseases Research and Application Center, Ankara, Turkiye.
  3. 3Department of Physiopathology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.

Abstract

Background: Medical formulas used in the dietary management of methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) are typically enriched in leucine and may contribute to branched-chain amino acid imbalance and appetite suppression. However, the relationship between dietary protein composition, circulating leucine levels, and appetite-regulating hormonal pathways in MMA remains unclear.

Objectives: To investigate the impact of dietary protein content and medical formula proportion on plasma amino acid profiles, appetite scores, and appetite-related hormonal regulation in pediatric patients with MMA.

Design: Prospective, single-center, three-phase dietary intervention study.

Methods: Ten pediatric patients with genetically confirmed MMA underwent a sequential three-step dietary intervention in which both total protein intake and the proportion of leucine-rich medical formula varied across phases. Each phase lasted at least two months. At the end of each phase, plasma amino acid levels (leucine, valine, and isoleucine), appetite-related hormones and peptides (GLP-1, ghrelin, neuropeptide Y [NPY], agouti-related peptide [AgRP], insulin, and leptin), and caregiver-reported appetite scores were assessed using fasting blood samples whenever clinically feasible, with a minimum fasting interval of 4 hours accepted in younger children.

Results: The dietary phases were associated with significant differences in plasma leucine and GLP-1 levels, with higher levels observed during the first phase than during the final phase (p=0.032 and p=0.002, respectively). Ghrelin, NPY, and AgRP levels also differed significantly across dietary phases (p=0.034, p=0.011, and p=0.012, respectively), alongside significantly improved appetite scores (p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in insulin or leptin concentrations across dietary phases.

Conclusion: In children with MMA, changes in dietary protein composition and medical formula exposure were associated with improved appetite and changes in appetite-related hormonal profiles. Because both total protein intake and medical formula intake changed across the study phases, the independent effects of protein quantity and protein source could not be determined. These findings suggest a potential association between dietary protein composition and appetite regulation in MMA but should be interpreted cautiously given the exploratory design and limited sample size.

Registration: Not applicable.

Related

  1. A network analysis of appetite and dietary behaviour patterns: differences between smokers and non-smokers.
    Yang Ni, Niuniu Sun, Jiale Qi +4
    Journal of health, population, and nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. Validity of a self-dietary assessment nutrition application (nutrirodcal) for estimating protein intake in patients with chronic kidney disease
    Chantisa Arayangkoon, Wittawat Wattanas
    Clinical Nutrition Open SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionDOAJ
  3. Effect of Zhengyuan capsules on post-chemotherapy appetite loss and cancer-related fatigue in patients with advanced lung cancer
    JIAO Yi, ZHANG Zheyuan, YUAN Luhongying +2
    Zhongguo linchuang yanjiuPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Validation of the discriminatory performance of the iPREFACE score for clinically significant fetal acidemia: an outcome-enriched nested case–control study
    Ayumu Ito, Mio Kamiya, Eijiro Hayata +2
    AJOG global reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Alpha-linolenic acid and dietary protein minimally but differentially regulate white adipose tissue lipolysis in female mice fed moderate-fat diets
    M. J. Clavet, S. E. Woods, M. Gonzalez-Soto +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPhysiologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{kose2026dietary,
  title = {{Dietary protein content and its impact on amino acid profile and appetite in patients with methylmalonic acidemia}},
  author = {Engin Köse and Neslihan Doğulu and Furkan Yolcu and Naci Polat and Fatma Tuba Eminoğlu},
  journal = {Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1177/20420188261489499},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188261489499},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dietary protein content and its impact on amino acid profile and appetite in patients with methylmalonic acidemia
AU  - Engin Köse
AU  - Neslihan Doğulu
AU  - Furkan Yolcu
AU  - Naci Polat
AU  - Fatma Tuba Eminoğlu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
JO  - Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism
DO  - 10.1177/20420188261489499
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188261489499
AB  - Background: Medical formulas used in the dietary management of methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) are typically enriched in leucine and may contribute to branched-chain amino acid imbalance and appetite suppression. However, the relationship between dietary protein composition, circulating leucine levels, and appetite-regulating hormonal pathways in MMA remains unclear.  Objectives: To investigate the impact of dietary protein content and medical formula proportion on plasma amino acid profiles, appetite scores, and appetite-related hormonal regulation in pediatric patients with MMA.  Design: Prospective, single-center, three-phase dietary intervention study.  Methods: Ten pediatric patients with genetically confirmed MMA underwent a sequential three-step dietary intervention in which both total protein intake and the proportion of leucine-rich medical formula varied across phases. Each phase lasted at least two months. At the end of each phase, plasma amino acid levels (leucine, valine, and isoleucine), appetite-related hormones and peptides (GLP-1, ghrelin, neuropeptide Y [NPY], agouti-related peptide [AgRP], insulin, and leptin), and caregiver-reported appetite scores were assessed using fasting blood samples whenever clinically feasible, with a minimum fasting interval of 4 hours accepted in younger children.  Results: The dietary phases were associated with significant differences in plasma leucine and GLP-1 levels, with higher levels observed during the first phase than during the final phase (p=0.032 and p=0.002, respectively). Ghrelin, NPY, and AgRP levels also differed significantly across dietary phases (p=0.034, p=0.011, and p=0.012, respectively), alongside significantly improved appetite scores (p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in insulin or leptin concentrations across dietary phases.  Conclusion: In children with MMA, changes in dietary protein composition and medical formula exposure were associated with improved appetite and changes in appetite-related hormonal profiles. Because both total protein intake and medical formula intake changed across the study phases, the independent effects of protein quantity and protein source could not be determined. These findings suggest a potential association between dietary protein composition and appetite regulation in MMA but should be interpreted cautiously given the exploratory design and limited sample size.  Registration: Not applicable.
SN  - 2042-0188
SN  - 2042-0196
ER  -