Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiponegoro International Medical Journal

Effects of Lullaby Exposure on Pain and Physiological Outcomes in Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  1. 1Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are frequently exposed to painful procedures and environmental stressors that may disrupt autonomic regulation and neurodevelopment. Lullaby-based auditory interventions have been proposed as safe, non-pharmacological strategies to reduce pain and improve physiological stability, yet evidence specific to lullabies has not been systematically synthesized.

Objective: This review evaluated the effects of lullaby exposure on pain and physiological parameters in preterm infants in NICUs.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies involving preterm infants (<37 weeks’ gestation) were included. Lullaby interventions were compared with standard care or other auditory controls. Neonatal pain assessed by the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) was meta-analyzed using a random-effects model, while physiological outcomes were narratively synthesized.

Results: Nine studies were included. Meta-analysis showed a non-significant trend toward lower pooled NIPS scores in the lullaby group, with an approximate one-point reduction favoring lullaby exposure. Descriptively, most studies reported significant within-group reductions in pain scores following lullaby interventions, particularly during post-procedural recovery. Maternal voice–based lullabies consistently demonstrated greater analgesic effects than recorded or instrumental lullabies. Physiological outcomes showed generally favorable trends, including more stable heart rates, reduced respiratory rates, and modest improvements in oxygen saturation, especially at delayed post-intervention time points.

Conclusion: Lullaby exposure, particularly maternal voice–based interventions, may serve as a safe and feasible adjunct to non-pharmacological pain management in NICUs, supporting short-term pain relief and physiological regulation in preterm infants.

Related

  1. Neonatal outcomes and immune reprogramming induced by prenatal opioid and hepatitis C exposure
    Brianna M. Doratt, Heather E. True, Sheridan B. Wagner +4
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossrefPMC
  2. Association between Prenatal Adversity and Neonatal Outcomes in Infants with Prenatal Opioid Exposure
    M. Ramirez Heil, M. Donahue, M. Camerota +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  3. Air pollution exposure and cataract outcomes: a systematic review and pollutant-specific meta-analysis
    Bin Zhang, Bing Xu, Kasra Pakdaman
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Fetal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review.
    Mayu Niisaka, Jun Hosomichi, Sakina Mitsuishi +2
    Frontiers in physiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  5. Physiotherapists’ knowledge and experiences of palliative care in neonatal intensive care units: a qualitative study Conhecimentos e vivência de fisioterapeutas sobre cuidados paliativos em unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal: um estudo qualitativo
    Lorena Oliveira Bezerra Morais, Adriana Valongo Zani, Fernanda Pegoraro de Godoi Melo +2
    Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao PauloPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{hartaman2026effects,
  title = {{Effects of Lullaby Exposure on Pain and Physiological Outcomes in Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis}},
  author = {Hisyam Hartaman},
  journal = {Diponegoro International Medical Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.14710/dimj.v7i1.31044},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.14710/dimj.v7i1.31044},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effects of Lullaby Exposure on Pain and Physiological Outcomes in Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU  - Hisyam Hartaman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - Diponegoro International Medical Journal
DO  - 10.14710/dimj.v7i1.31044
UR  - https://doi.org/10.14710/dimj.v7i1.31044
AB  - Background: Preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are frequently exposed to painful procedures and environmental stressors that may disrupt autonomic regulation and neurodevelopment. Lullaby-based auditory interventions have been proposed as safe, non-pharmacological strategies to reduce pain and improve physiological stability, yet evidence specific to lullabies has not been systematically synthesized.  Objective: This review evaluated the effects of lullaby exposure on pain and physiological parameters in preterm infants in NICUs.  Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies involving preterm infants (<37 weeks’ gestation) were included. Lullaby interventions were compared with standard care or other auditory controls. Neonatal pain assessed by the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) was meta-analyzed using a random-effects model, while physiological outcomes were narratively synthesized.  Results: Nine studies were included. Meta-analysis showed a non-significant trend toward lower pooled NIPS scores in the lullaby group, with an approximate one-point reduction favoring lullaby exposure. Descriptively, most studies reported significant within-group reductions in pain scores following lullaby interventions, particularly during post-procedural recovery. Maternal voice–based lullabies consistently demonstrated greater analgesic effects than recorded or instrumental lullabies. Physiological outcomes showed generally favorable trends, including more stable heart rates, reduced respiratory rates, and modest improvements in oxygen saturation, especially at delayed post-intervention time points.  Conclusion: Lullaby exposure, particularly maternal voice–based interventions, may serve as a safe and feasible adjunct to non-pharmacological pain management in NICUs, supporting short-term pain relief and physiological regulation in preterm infants.
SN  - 2745-5815
ER  -