Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Consumer experiences and perceptions of change during psychotherapy for suicide imagery – a mixed-methods case series of Integrated skills for SUicide IMagery (I-SUIM)

Abstract

Background and objectives: This study is the first to explore mechanisms of change and engagement experiences for consumers completing a tailored intervention involving imagery rescripting, replacement implementation intentions, and imagery rehearsal to target hypothesised mechanisms of suicide imagery (Integrated skills for SUicide IMagery; I-SUIM). Design and Methods: Adult participants with suicide imagery (N = 8) completed two weekly baseline surveys, followed by 3-4 I-SUIM sessions with post-session measures, and a two-week follow-up survey. Evaluation included qualitative interviews at follow-up and mixed-methods surveys collecting qualitative feedback and quantitative ratings of suicide imagery duration, coping, imagery meaning, distress, suicide urge, imagery features, and metacognitions. Results: No participants dropped out of treatment, and there were no series adverse events. All participants endorsed the intervention as beneficial. Most reported improved understanding of imagery precipitants and function, meaning, and safety plan use. Improvements in other mechanisms were more variable, including changes to imagery features, defusion, emotion changes, and metacognitive shifts. Participants noted some challenges including temporary imagery salience and negative affect immediately following rescripting and difficulty practicing independently. Participants described the role of an experienced and empathetic therapist important to guide intervention and help them feel less alone. Limitations: There was no control arm and the study was not designed to demonstrate efficacy. Conclusions: I-SUIM appears safe and acceptable with qualitatively reported improvements. However, the specific nature of improvements may vary between individuals, and future research is required to assess efficacy across a range of cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes.

Related

  1. Psychotherapy remains a human endeavor: Human therapy is valued more than AI-integrated therapy
    C. Xu, T. Kim
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  2. Mapping Adolescents’ Experiences with Depression and Psychotherapy Using A Mixed-Methods Approach to Tailor Youth Assessment
    Jennifer Chen, Bennett Kleinberg, Melissa De Smet
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. Perceived health and well-being of migrant female street food vendors: a mixed - method study of vendor - consumer perceptions of informal street food economy in Chennai, India.
    A Wincie Wilmah, R K Jaishree Karthiga
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Psychotherapy training in psychiatry: a systematic review and narrative synthesis on the supervision experiences of early-career psychiatrists
    Selin Tanyeri Kayahan, Mustafa Dinçer, Jesper Nørgaard Kjær +2
    Psychiatry ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  5. Consumer-driven cosmetovigilance: A cross-sectional survey on risk perceptions and public health implications in the United Arab Emirates.
    Haea Amar Alkoud, Huda Ahmed Jaber, Sathvik Belagodu Sridhar +2
    Journal of education and health promotionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{martin2026consumer,
  title = {{Consumer experiences and perceptions of change during psychotherapy for suicide imagery – a mixed-methods case series of Integrated skills for SUicide IMagery (I-SUIM)}},
  author = {Ann Martin and Demee Rheinberger and Peter McEvoy and Georgie Paulik and William Crompton and Lauren Stavropoulos and Melissa Black and Fiona Shand},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/tfd37_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/tfd37_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Consumer experiences and perceptions of change during psychotherapy for suicide imagery – a mixed-methods case series of Integrated skills for SUicide IMagery (I-SUIM)
AU  - Ann Martin
AU  - Demee Rheinberger
AU  - Peter McEvoy
AU  - Georgie Paulik
AU  - William Crompton
AU  - Lauren Stavropoulos
AU  - Melissa Black
AU  - Fiona Shand
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/tfd37_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/tfd37_v1/
AB  - Background and objectives: This study is the first to explore mechanisms of change and engagement experiences for consumers completing a tailored intervention involving imagery rescripting, replacement implementation intentions, and imagery rehearsal to target hypothesised mechanisms of suicide imagery (Integrated skills for SUicide IMagery; I-SUIM). Design and Methods: Adult participants with suicide imagery (N = 8) completed two weekly baseline surveys, followed by 3-4 I-SUIM sessions with post-session measures, and a two-week follow-up survey. Evaluation included qualitative interviews at follow-up and mixed-methods surveys collecting qualitative feedback and quantitative ratings of suicide imagery duration, coping, imagery meaning, distress, suicide urge, imagery features, and metacognitions. Results: No participants dropped out of treatment, and there were no series adverse events. All participants endorsed the intervention as beneficial. Most reported improved understanding of imagery precipitants and function, meaning, and safety plan use. Improvements in other mechanisms were more variable, including changes to imagery features, defusion, emotion changes, and metacognitive shifts. Participants noted some challenges including temporary imagery salience and negative affect immediately following rescripting and difficulty practicing independently. Participants described the role of an experienced and empathetic therapist important to guide intervention and help them feel less alone. Limitations: There was no control arm and the study was not designed to demonstrate efficacy. Conclusions: I-SUIM appears safe and acceptable with qualitatively reported improvements. However, the specific nature of improvements may vary between individuals, and future research is required to assess efficacy across a range of cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes.
ER  -