Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

A Quantum/Classical Example Oracle Separation for Making Things Up

Abstract

Consider two PAC learning algorithms, both having access to quantum computation, but differing in the types of examples they obtain: one is provided with classical samples, while the other is given quantum samples. Are there any learning tasks that can be efficiently performed by the latter, but not by the former? This question, the focus of our work, is surprisingly still open. Our main result is to show that \emph{relative to an oracle}, there are distributions that can be efficiently generated by a quantum learner with access to quantum samples, but not by a quantum learner with access to only classical samples, making progress to answering this question in the affirmative.

Related

  1. An example of universal braiding in Links--Gould topological quantum computation
    Matthew Harper, Ben-Michael Kohli
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Quantum Graph Theory by Example
    Gian Luca Spitzer, Ion Nechita
    QuantumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsCrossrefHAL
  3. Universal classical and quantum fluctuations in the large deviations of current of noisy quantum systems: Quantum symmetric simple exclusion and inclusion processes
    Mathias Albert, Denis Bernard, Tony Jin +2
    Physical Review EPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text10 citedMathematical physicsHALOpenAlex
  4. Quantum-classical dynamics of Rashba spin-orbit coupling
    Paul Bergold, Giovanni Manfredi, Cesare Tronci
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textMathematical physicsHAL
  5. Classical and Quantum Logics with Multiple Non-Equivalent and Non-Isomorphic Models
    Mladen Pavicic
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryLogic & foundationsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026quantumclassical,
  title = {{A Quantum/Classical Example Oracle Separation for Making Things Up}},
  author = {Kenny Chen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.11648},
  eprint = {2608.11648},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11648},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Quantum/Classical Example Oracle Separation for Making Things Up
AU  - Kenny Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.11648
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11648
AB  - Consider two PAC learning algorithms, both having access to quantum computation, but differing in the types of examples they obtain: one is provided with classical samples, while the other is given quantum samples. Are there any learning tasks that can be efficiently performed by the latter, but not by the former? This question, the focus of our work, is surprisingly still open. Our main result is to show that \emph{relative to an oracle}, there are distributions that can be efficiently generated by a quantum learner with access to quantum samples, but not by a quantum learner with access to only classical samples, making progress to answering this question in the affirmative.
ER  -