Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Quasi-experimental evaluation of public space quality of Barcelona’s Superblocks Green Axis

Abstract

Urban greening and traffic calming are promoted as population-health strategies, yet objective empirical evaluations remain scarce. Barcelona’s Superblocks Green Axis redesigned streets and created new squares in Eixample district (2022–2024) to prioritise pedestrians, greenery and social life. We assessed whether this intervention improved public space quality as key health determinants supporting healthier and more inclusive urban living. We conducted a quasi-experimental before–after study with a comparison group. The intervention comprised seven street segments and four new squares (≈102,000 m²); the comparison included two nearby street segments. Public space quality was assessed pre- (May 2022) and post-intervention (January 2024) using an ad hoc 41-item tool covering eight dimensions: architectural characteristics, natural areas, facilities, maintenance and cleanliness, environmental characteristics, attractiveness and comfort, safety, and social aspects. Net effects were estimated using difference-in-differences (DiD) analyses. DiD analyses show significant changes in natural areas (+4.94 points), maintenance and cleanliness (+2.55) architectural characteristics (+2.28), safety (+1.61), and environmental characteristics (+1.00) contrasted with the comparison street. These improvements reflect increased greenery, pedestrian-priority space, and accessibility and reduced traffic-related exposures likely to benefit more vulnerable populations groups, such as older adults, children or people with mobility limitations. This evaluation provides empirical evidence that street redesign can substantially improve health determinants. From an equity perspective, reducing traffic exposure and enhancing accessible, safe and attractive public spaces may foster more inclusive daily mobility and social interaction, while potential adverse effects such as gentrification should be monitored. These findings support scaling up alongside equity-oriented governance and evaluation.

Key messages: • Green Axis Street redesign substantially improved public space quality, especially greenery, safety and pedestrian conditions, through a quasi-experimental evaluation.

• By reducing traffic exposure and improving access and safety, Green Axes promote inclusive daily mobility and social street use, contributing to urban health equity.

Related

  1. Biases and corrections in total factor productivity evaluation in Chinese public hospitals: an opinion under the policy lens of new quality productive forces.
    Xuesong Li
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Multidimensional evaluation of generative AI chatbots for public consultation on sudden cardiac death: safety, accuracy, empathy, reliability, quality, and readability across six models
    Youyou Chen, Hui Ma, Huimin Wang +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. An intersectoral policy response to chemsex in Barcelona: governance and public health action
    M G Barbaglia, E M Puigdomènech, M I Pasarín +2
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  4. Evaluation of Health Management Information System data quality and information use for HIV/AIDS programs in public health facilities of Jimma town, Southwest Ethiopia
    Samson Tashome Abashu, Tilahun Fufa Debela, Muluembet Abera Wordofa +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. Evaluation of the tuberculosis notification impact from an intermediary-facilitated public–private mix intervention in Viet Nam: A population-level quasi-experimental study
    Luan Nguyen Quang Vo, Thuy Thi Thu Dong, Huy Ba Huynh +26
    PLOS MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthInfectious diseasePLOS
BibTeX
@article{perez2026quasiexperimental,
  title = {{Quasi-experimental evaluation of public space quality of Barcelona’s Superblocks Green Axis}},
  author = {K Pérez and AM Novoa and M González-Calleja and E Sánchez-Ledesma and X Continente and MJ López},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.840},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.840},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quasi-experimental evaluation of public space quality of Barcelona’s Superblocks Green Axis
AU  - K Pérez
AU  - AM Novoa
AU  - M González-Calleja
AU  - E Sánchez-Ledesma
AU  - X Continente
AU  - MJ López
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.840
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.840
AB  - Urban greening and traffic calming are promoted as population-health strategies, yet objective empirical evaluations remain scarce. Barcelona’s Superblocks Green Axis redesigned streets and created new squares in Eixample district (2022–2024) to prioritise pedestrians, greenery and social life. We assessed whether this intervention improved public space quality as key health determinants supporting healthier and more inclusive urban living. We conducted a quasi-experimental before–after study with a comparison group. The intervention comprised seven street segments and four new squares (≈102,000 m²); the comparison included two nearby street segments. Public space quality was assessed pre- (May 2022) and post-intervention (January 2024) using an ad hoc 41-item tool covering eight dimensions: architectural characteristics, natural areas, facilities, maintenance and cleanliness, environmental characteristics, attractiveness and comfort, safety, and social aspects. Net effects were estimated using difference-in-differences (DiD) analyses. DiD analyses show significant changes in natural areas (+4.94 points), maintenance and cleanliness (+2.55) architectural characteristics (+2.28), safety (+1.61), and environmental characteristics (+1.00) contrasted with the comparison street. These improvements reflect increased greenery, pedestrian-priority space, and accessibility and reduced traffic-related exposures likely to benefit more vulnerable populations groups, such as older adults, children or people with mobility limitations. This evaluation provides empirical evidence that street redesign can substantially improve health determinants. From an equity perspective, reducing traffic exposure and enhancing accessible, safe and attractive public spaces may foster more inclusive daily mobility and social interaction, while potential adverse effects such as gentrification should be monitored. These findings support scaling up alongside equity-oriented governance and evaluation.  Key messages: • Green Axis Street redesign substantially improved public space quality, especially greenery, safety and pedestrian conditions, through a quasi-experimental evaluation.  • By reducing traffic exposure and improving access and safety, Green Axes promote inclusive daily mobility and social street use, contributing to urban health equity.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -