Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Predicting droplet landing in angle-controlled surface acoustic wave jetting

Abstract

Nozzle-free droplet generation eliminates the need for a dispensing orifice, but useful printing also requires control over where droplets are deposited. Here we demonstrate predictable droplet deposition using a nozzle-free, angle-controlled surface acoustic wave jetting platform. Opposing focused interdigital transducers steer droplets from a pendant parent drop toward a collection substrate, with the ejection angle set by the time-integrated acoustic acceleration imbalance. The overall acceleration ratio identifies the operating window for single-droplet ejection and separates it from no-ejection, satellite-droplet, and multiple-droplet regimes. We then connect ejection angle to landing position through a geometric deposition model referenced to a balanced shot in each experiment. At a 5.2 mm parent-drop-to-substrate spacing, 80 steered shots across twenty experiments show strongly anisotropic relative placement scatter: 0.59 mm in the steering direction and 0.06 mm transverse to it. In tests conducted independently over several days, a model calibrated on six earlier collection dates predicted landing positions on two later dates with a root-mean-square error of 0.71 mm; bootstrap resampling placed the 95% confidence range for this error between 0.41 and 1.01 mm. The results establish a practical framework for predicting relative droplet landing in angle-controlled surface acoustic wave jetting and identify the limits imposed by steering angle, separation distance, and actuation regime from an orifice-free, clog-free droplet ejection method.

Related

  1. Machine learning surrogate modeling with quantile adjustment for landing gear surface pressure fluctuation prediction
    Zeyuan Cheng, Kamran Behdinan
    Discover Artificial IntelligencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatistical & nonlinear physicsPMCEurope PMC
  2. Impact of Drag Force between Droplet and Gas on Suppression of a Buoyancy-Controlled Fire via Water Mist
    Marianne Houndekon, Hui-Ying Wang, Bruno Coudour +1
    Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
  3. Micromagnetic modeling of surface acoustic wave—driven dynamics: Interplay of strain, magnetorotation, and magnetic anisotropy
    Florian Millo, Pauline Rovillain, Massimiliano Marangolo +1
    Physical Review AppliedPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedComputational physicsCondensed matterHAL
  4. On-Chip Shaping of Surface Acoustic Waves via Continuous Diffractive Modulation
    Yuanpeng Ma, Yang Zhao, Shangyang Chen +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral physicsarXiv
  5. Topologically Protected Surface Acoustic Wave Edge States in Phononic Integrated Circuits
    Jack Guida, Niccolo Scalise Pantuso, Cristian Cassella +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{aminul2026predicting,
  title = {{Predicting droplet landing in angle-controlled surface acoustic wave jetting}},
  author = {Md Aminul and Sara Adibi and James Friend},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.30407},
  eprint = {2610.30407},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30407},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Predicting droplet landing in angle-controlled surface acoustic wave jetting
AU  - Md Aminul
AU  - Sara Adibi
AU  - James Friend
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.30407
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30407
AB  - Nozzle-free droplet generation eliminates the need for a dispensing orifice, but useful printing also requires control over where droplets are deposited. Here we demonstrate predictable droplet deposition using a nozzle-free, angle-controlled surface acoustic wave jetting platform. Opposing focused interdigital transducers steer droplets from a pendant parent drop toward a collection substrate, with the ejection angle set by the time-integrated acoustic acceleration imbalance. The overall acceleration ratio identifies the operating window for single-droplet ejection and separates it from no-ejection, satellite-droplet, and multiple-droplet regimes. We then connect ejection angle to landing position through a geometric deposition model referenced to a balanced shot in each experiment. At a 5.2 mm parent-drop-to-substrate spacing, 80 steered shots across twenty experiments show strongly anisotropic relative placement scatter: 0.59 mm in the steering direction and 0.06 mm transverse to it. In tests conducted independently over several days, a model calibrated on six earlier collection dates predicted landing positions on two later dates with a root-mean-square error of 0.71 mm; bootstrap resampling placed the 95% confidence range for this error between 0.41 and 1.01 mm. The results establish a practical framework for predicting relative droplet landing in angle-controlled surface acoustic wave jetting and identify the limits imposed by steering angle, separation distance, and actuation regime from an orifice-free, clog-free droplet ejection method.
ER  -