Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Putting a Temperature on Electron Correlation

Abstract

It is common wisdom that a better understanding of how to quantify electron correlation should lead to more efficient treatments of the correlation problem. Here, we not only substantiate this view but turn it into a concrete, systematic framework for ground states. Since prominent correlation measures such as the nonfreeness depend only on the one-particle reduced density matrix, modeling the correlation energy as a function of such a measure naturally places the framework within reduced density matrix functional theory, while keeping the cost at mean-field level. Strikingly, the variable conjugate to the measure emerges as a ``correlation temperature'', thereby connecting correlation measures, functional theory, and effective temperatures. The framework rationalizes methods such as i-DMFT, and we illustrate its key concepts analytically for the Hubbard dimer and numerically for small molecular systems. This brings a fundamental question within reach: how much of the correlation problem can be solved at mean-field cost?

Related

  1. Correlation-enhanced electron-phonon coupling in FeSe/ SrTiO 3 at a magic angle
    Anonymous, Antik Sihi, Basu Dev Oli +6
    Physical review. B./Physical review. BPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
  2. Learning Memory-Dependent Neural Network Correlation Potentials for Accurate Electron Dynamics
    Harish S. Bhat, Christine M. Isborn
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Adding Temperature to the Adiabatic Connection: Hybrid Functionals for Static and Dynamic Correlation
    Florian Matz, Paul G. Graf, Markus Penz +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Reconfigurable Ferroelectric‐Like Two‐Dimensional Electron Gas at Room Temperature
    Martando Rath, Yu Chen, Daniela Stornaiuolo +14
    Advanced MaterialsPeer-reviewedCC BYMaterials & polymersGeneral physicsHAL
  5. Spiroketal Synthesis Via Uncatalyzed Inverse Electron-Demand Hetero-Diels-Alder Reactions at Ambient Temperature.
    Emma J Greene, Matthew C Raeside, Marcelo A Mazariego +3
    Journal of the American Chemical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOrganic chemistryEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{graf2026putting,
  title = {{Putting a Temperature on Electron Correlation}},
  author = {Paul G. Graf and Florian Matz and Markus Penz and Christian Schilling},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.22134},
  eprint = {2610.22134},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22134},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Putting a Temperature on Electron Correlation
AU  - Paul G. Graf
AU  - Florian Matz
AU  - Markus Penz
AU  - Christian Schilling
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.22134
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22134
AB  - It is common wisdom that a better understanding of how to quantify electron correlation should lead to more efficient treatments of the correlation problem. Here, we not only substantiate this view but turn it into a concrete, systematic framework for ground states. Since prominent correlation measures such as the nonfreeness depend only on the one-particle reduced density matrix, modeling the correlation energy as a function of such a measure naturally places the framework within reduced density matrix functional theory, while keeping the cost at mean-field level. Strikingly, the variable conjugate to the measure emerges as a ``correlation temperature'', thereby connecting correlation measures, functional theory, and effective temperatures. The framework rationalizes methods such as i-DMFT, and we illustrate its key concepts analytically for the Hubbard dimer and numerically for small molecular systems. This brings a fundamental question within reach: how much of the correlation problem can be solved at mean-field cost?
ER  -