Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCmedRxiv

Integrated multiomic scores for cardiovascular disease prediction across multiancestral populations

14 more authors
  1. 1Cardiology Department, University Hospital Basel

Abstract

Background: Genomic, epigenomic, and proteomic data capture complementary aspects of cardiovascular disease biology, but the value of integrating these data for predicting multiple cardiovascular disease outcomes across ancestry groups remains uncertain. Methods: We derived disease-specific proteomic scores using 999 plasma proteins in 50,673 UK Biobank participants and validated them in 9,358 participants from the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study. In PURE, we integrated these proteomic scores with 2,279 polygenic scores and 479 DNA methylation scores to develop 4 multiomic scores (MEGASCOREs) for myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), and cardiovascular mortality. Associations with incident cardiovascular disease, discrimination, calibration, and performance across ancestry groups were evaluated in PURE and 2 additional cohorts. Results: In pooled analyses, each standard deviation increase in the corresponding MEGASCORE was associated with MI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.86-2.43), AF (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.68-2.24), HF (HR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.75-4.05), and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.33-4.61). MEGASCOREs improved discrimination compared with clinical models, with strongest improvements for HF and cardiovascular mortality. MEGASCORE-CV-Death had a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than SCORE2 for cardiovascular mortality (0.83 [95% CI, 0.82-0.85] vs. 0.78 [95% CI, 0.77-0.80]). Its discrimination was also higher than that of SCORE2 across all 4 ancestry groups, with better calibration across non-European ancestry groups. MEGASCOREs remained associated with cardiovascular outcomes among participants without conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: Integrated multiomic MEGASCOREs were associated with multiple cardiovascular outcomes and provided prognostic information beyond conventional clinical variables in PURE.

Related

  1. Multiomic liquid biopsy: emerging applications in disease quantification, biomarker detection, molecular phenotyping, and cancer signal of origin prediction
    Jinesh S. Gheeya, Lauren Welch, Jason Porter +4
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
  2. Accelerating cardiovascular digital twin creation using precomputed virtual populations as Bayesian priors
    Iris L. Shelly, Jon N. Peterson, Giulia Cornali +3
    Frontiers in physiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Elevated Lipoprotein(a) in Asian Populations and its Implications for Cardiovascular Disease.
    Matthew D'Amore, Wann Jia Loh, David Tak Wai Lui +15
    JACC. AsiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Long-Term Cardiovascular, Thromboembolic, and Malignancy Safety of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in Dermatologic and Rheumatologic Populations: A Narrative Comparative Review.
    Shakira Bou Rolon, Andrea N Ortiz Echevarria, Monica Burgos Claudio +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. A clinical prediction nomogram for hemorrhoid risk in health screening populations in Beijing, China: a retrospective cohort study of 35,256 adults
    Jia Wu, Keyang Zheng, Haixiang Liu +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{meyre2026integrated,
  title = {{Integrated multiomic scores for cardiovascular disease prediction across multiancestral populations}},
  author = {P. B. Meyre and M. Chong and M. Pigeyre and S. Mao and M. Kamal and S. I. Bangdiwala and R. Kelishadi and A. Rosengren and F. Lanas and A. Yusufali and R. Yusuf and J. Chifamba and P. Lopez-Jaramillo and M. E. M. Abat and A. A. Junior and K. Yeates and M. L. Diaz and H. Mir and B. D. Keavney and S. S. Anand and K. Teo and S. Rangarajan and P. Joseph and H. C. Gerstein and S. Yusuf and G. Pare},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.23.26366372},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.23.26366372v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Integrated multiomic scores for cardiovascular disease prediction across multiancestral populations
AU  - P. B. Meyre
AU  - M. Chong
AU  - M. Pigeyre
AU  - S. Mao
AU  - M. Kamal
AU  - S. I. Bangdiwala
AU  - R. Kelishadi
AU  - A. Rosengren
AU  - F. Lanas
AU  - A. Yusufali
AU  - R. Yusuf
AU  - J. Chifamba
AU  - P. Lopez-Jaramillo
AU  - M. E. M. Abat
AU  - A. A. Junior
AU  - K. Yeates
AU  - M. L. Diaz
AU  - H. Mir
AU  - B. D. Keavney
AU  - S. S. Anand
AU  - K. Teo
AU  - S. Rangarajan
AU  - P. Joseph
AU  - H. C. Gerstein
AU  - S. Yusuf
AU  - G. Pare
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.23.26366372
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.23.26366372v1
AB  - Background: Genomic, epigenomic, and proteomic data capture complementary aspects of cardiovascular disease biology, but the value of integrating these data for predicting multiple cardiovascular disease outcomes across ancestry groups remains uncertain. Methods: We derived disease-specific proteomic scores using 999 plasma proteins in 50,673 UK Biobank participants and validated them in 9,358 participants from the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study. In PURE, we integrated these proteomic scores with 2,279 polygenic scores and 479 DNA methylation scores to develop 4 multiomic scores (MEGASCOREs) for myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), and cardiovascular mortality. Associations with incident cardiovascular disease, discrimination, calibration, and performance across ancestry groups were evaluated in PURE and 2 additional cohorts. Results: In pooled analyses, each standard deviation increase in the corresponding MEGASCORE was associated with MI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.86-2.43), AF (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.68-2.24), HF (HR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.75-4.05), and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.33-4.61). MEGASCOREs improved discrimination compared with clinical models, with strongest improvements for HF and cardiovascular mortality. MEGASCORE-CV-Death had a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than SCORE2 for cardiovascular mortality (0.83 [95% CI, 0.82-0.85] vs. 0.78 [95% CI, 0.77-0.80]). Its discrimination was also higher than that of SCORE2 across all 4 ancestry groups, with better calibration across non-European ancestry groups. MEGASCOREs remained associated with cardiovascular outcomes among participants without conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: Integrated multiomic MEGASCOREs were associated with multiple cardiovascular outcomes and provided prognostic information beyond conventional clinical variables in PURE.
ER  -