Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in health services

Effect of the CP@clinic program (Community Paramedicine at Clinic program) on health care utilization from administrative data during and after the intervention: a cluster-randomized controlled trial

  1. 1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University , , ,
  2. 2Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University , , ,

Abstract

Introduction

The study objective was to compare the effects of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) program versus usual care on building-level health service utilization during a 12-month trial period and 12 months post-trial.Methods

This study employed a longitudinal, repeated cross-sectional design within a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT). It involved 30 apartment buildings across five Ontario communities, housing low-income older adults. Buildings were paired and randomized to receive either the CP@clinic intervention or continuing with usual care. Data was derived from ICES-maintained administrative health databases, linked using unique identifiers. The sample included all residents aged 55 + in the study postal codes from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) Registered Persons Database (RPDB), excluding those aged 120+, ineligible for OHIP, and those with no health care encounters within 7 years. The primary health care utilization outcome was emergency department visits by ambulance and other outcomes included hospital admissions and primary care visits.Results

CP@clinic buildings showed significantly lower hospital admission rates during both the 12-month RCT period (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 0.75 [0.61,0.91]) and the 12-month post-RCT period [aIRR: 0.82 (0.70,0.96)] compared to usual care buildings. Primary care visits were lower in CP@clinic buildings during the RCT (aIRR: 0.93 [0.88,0.99]) but higher in the post-RCT period (aIRR: 1.05 [1.00,1.10]). No significant differences were found in emergency department visits or the number of days admitted between groups in either period.Discussion

CP@clinic was linked to a sustained reduction in hospital admissions and an increase in primary care visits beyond the RCT time period, reflecting a shift from reactive to preventive care among older adults residing in social housing. The lasting impact beyond the RCT period suggests that the CP@clinic Program can improve health system efficiency, primary care access, and reduce health inequities in vulnerable populations.Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02152891.

Related

  1. Efficacy of a weighted-vest aerobic dance intervention for enhancing lower extremity strength and mobility in older adults: a randomized controlled trial
    Sasithorn Sukjit, Bhakbhum Choktaweepanich, Worrawut Thuwakum
    Physical activity and nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Culturally adapted home-based intervention to improve child’s development in Arab toddlers in Israel: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Niveen Omar, Michael Davidovitch, Hazar Zahalka +2
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  3. Whole-course care intervention for patients with spinal cord injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Peipei Ding, Haoran Li, Hui Huang +5
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  4. Effect of an educational indoor air quality intervention on cognitive status, sleep quality, balance, and sick building syndrome in older adults: a randomized controlled trial
    Negar Paydar, Masoud Karimi, Hassan Hashemi +2
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  5. m-Health intervention for physical activity among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India: a randomized controlled trial
    Pappu Prasad Shah, Nidhi Bhatnagar, Bratati Banerjee +4
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{agarwal2026effect,
  title = {{Effect of the CP@clinic program (Community Paramedicine at Clinic program) on health care utilization from administrative data during and after the intervention: a cluster-randomized controlled trial}},
  author = {Gina Agarwal and Melissa Pirrie and Manasvi Sai Vanama and Zheng Jing Hu and J. Michael Paterson and Lehana Thabane and Ricardo Angeles and Francine Marzanek},
  journal = {Frontiers in health services},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/frhs.2026.1939050},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13716780},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effect of the CP@clinic program (Community Paramedicine at Clinic program) on health care utilization from administrative data during and after the intervention: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
AU  - Gina Agarwal
AU  - Melissa Pirrie
AU  - Manasvi Sai Vanama
AU  - Zheng Jing Hu
AU  - J. Michael Paterson
AU  - Lehana Thabane
AU  - Ricardo Angeles
AU  - Francine Marzanek
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Frontiers in health services
DO  - 10.3389/frhs.2026.1939050
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13716780
AB  - Introduction  The study objective was to compare the effects of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) program versus usual care on building-level health service utilization during a 12-month trial period and 12 months post-trial.Methods  This study employed a longitudinal, repeated cross-sectional design within a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT). It involved 30 apartment buildings across five Ontario communities, housing low-income older adults. Buildings were paired and randomized to receive either the CP@clinic intervention or continuing with usual care. Data was derived from ICES-maintained administrative health databases, linked using unique identifiers. The sample included all residents aged 55 + in the study postal codes from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) Registered Persons Database (RPDB), excluding those aged 120+, ineligible for OHIP, and those with no health care encounters within 7 years. The primary health care utilization outcome was emergency department visits by ambulance and other outcomes included hospital admissions and primary care visits.Results  CP@clinic buildings showed significantly lower hospital admission rates during both the 12-month RCT period (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 0.75 [0.61,0.91]) and the 12-month post-RCT period [aIRR: 0.82 (0.70,0.96)] compared to usual care buildings. Primary care visits were lower in CP@clinic buildings during the RCT (aIRR: 0.93 [0.88,0.99]) but higher in the post-RCT period (aIRR: 1.05 [1.00,1.10]). No significant differences were found in emergency department visits or the number of days admitted between groups in either period.Discussion  CP@clinic was linked to a sustained reduction in hospital admissions and an increase in primary care visits beyond the RCT time period, reflecting a shift from reactive to preventive care among older adults residing in social housing. The lasting impact beyond the RCT period suggests that the CP@clinic Program can improve health system efficiency, primary care access, and reduce health inequities in vulnerable populations.Trial registration  ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02152891.
SN  - 2813-0146
ER  -