Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Pathological Tumor–Nodal Response Patterns After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Prognostic Impact of Residual ypN-Positive Disease

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne 22030, Türkiye

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer may differ between the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes, and the prognostic implications of this discordance remain incompletely defined. We evaluated oncological outcomes according to combined pathological tumor–nodal response patterns, with particular emphasis on complete primary-tumor regression with residual ypN-positive disease. Methods: A total of 215 patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by curative-intent resection were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as ypT0N0 (n = 34), ypT0N+ (n = 13), residual primary tumor/ypN0 (n = 119), or residual primary tumor/ypN+ (n = 49). The primary endpoint was time to recurrence (TTR). Kaplan–Meier, Cox, Firth penalized Cox, competing-risk, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Median follow-up was 70.0 months. Recurrence occurred in 2/34 (5.9%), 6/13 (46.2%), 17/119 (14.3%), and 18/49 (36.7%) patients, respectively. Estimated 5-year recurrence-free probabilities were 90.1%, 53.8%, 81.6%, and 46.3%, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001). Compared with ypT0N0, recurrence hazard was significantly higher for ypT0N+ (adjusted hazard ratio 7.56, 95% confidence interval 1.49–38.40; p = 0.015) and residual primary tumor/ypN+ (adjusted hazard ratio 7.10, 95% confidence interval 1.64–30.83; p = 0.009). In an analysis restricted to patients with baseline cT3N1 disease, the association for ypT0N+ remained evident (adjusted hazard ratio 6.34, 95% confidence interval 1.19–33.79; p = 0.031). Competing-risk analyses were concordant, and all documented recurrences in the ypT0N+ group involved distant metastasis. Conclusions: In this cohort, residual ypN-positive disease despite complete pathological regression of the primary tumor was associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Given the small number of patients with ypT0N+ disease, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and require validation in larger independent cohorts.

Related

  1. Pre-Treatment CD44 and CD47 Expression and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: An Exploratory Single-Center Study
    Hatice Asoglu, Esra Asarkaya, Abdurrahman Aykut +13
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
  2. Comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatment strategies and predictors of pathological complete response in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world retrospective cohort study
    Xiaoli Yuan, Yuying Liang, Tianlin Han +8
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefPMC
  3. Pathological Response Depth and Pre-Treatment Risk Stratification After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer.
    Tibiana Negru, Loredana Gabriela Stana, Livia Stanga +3
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Relative change rate of neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (ΔNAR) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts axillary pathological complete response in locally advanced breast cancer
    Yujie Zhao, Yuxiang Deng, Weicai Chen +4
    Gland SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Advances in predictive factors for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Xin Lei, Yujia Han, Xiaozhou Wang +4
    Radiation OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedOncologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{aytin2026pathological,
  title = {{Pathological Tumor–Nodal Response Patterns After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Prognostic Impact of Residual ypN-Positive Disease}},
  author = {Yusuf Emre Aytin and Sezer Berkay Gorca},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18203352},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3352},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pathological Tumor–Nodal Response Patterns After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Prognostic Impact of Residual ypN-Positive Disease
AU  - Yusuf Emre Aytin
AU  - Sezer Berkay Gorca
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18203352
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3352
AB  - Background/Objectives: Pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer may differ between the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes, and the prognostic implications of this discordance remain incompletely defined. We evaluated oncological outcomes according to combined pathological tumor–nodal response patterns, with particular emphasis on complete primary-tumor regression with residual ypN-positive disease. Methods: A total of 215 patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by curative-intent resection were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as ypT0N0 (n = 34), ypT0N+ (n = 13), residual primary tumor/ypN0 (n = 119), or residual primary tumor/ypN+ (n = 49). The primary endpoint was time to recurrence (TTR). Kaplan–Meier, Cox, Firth penalized Cox, competing-risk, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Median follow-up was 70.0 months. Recurrence occurred in 2/34 (5.9%), 6/13 (46.2%), 17/119 (14.3%), and 18/49 (36.7%) patients, respectively. Estimated 5-year recurrence-free probabilities were 90.1%, 53.8%, 81.6%, and 46.3%, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001). Compared with ypT0N0, recurrence hazard was significantly higher for ypT0N+ (adjusted hazard ratio 7.56, 95% confidence interval 1.49–38.40; p = 0.015) and residual primary tumor/ypN+ (adjusted hazard ratio 7.10, 95% confidence interval 1.64–30.83; p = 0.009). In an analysis restricted to patients with baseline cT3N1 disease, the association for ypT0N+ remained evident (adjusted hazard ratio 6.34, 95% confidence interval 1.19–33.79; p = 0.031). Competing-risk analyses were concordant, and all documented recurrences in the ypT0N+ group involved distant metastasis. Conclusions: In this cohort, residual ypN-positive disease despite complete pathological regression of the primary tumor was associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Given the small number of patients with ypT0N+ disease, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and require validation in larger independent cohorts.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -