PreprintCC BY 4.0EcoEvoRxiv
The unequal burden of biodiversity reporting
Abstract
Discussions around the first review of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework reveal how the pursuit of more comprehensive measurement can obscure a challenge that will define the post-2030 agenda: ensuring that all countries and stakeholders are able to participate in and be represented by the systems used to evaluate global progress.
Related
- Artificial light at night causes unequal and species-specific shifts in infection risk by a generalist marine parasite
- Mestizos and Mennonites Facing the Water Crisis in Northern Mexico : Differentiated Trajectories of the Social Construction of Water Scarcity and Unequal Agricultural Adaptation Strategies (Laguna de Bustillos, Cuauhtémoc, Chihuahua, Mexico)
- Why nature cannot be replaced: the limits of substitution in biodiversity conservation
- Trait-based functional indices reveal contrasting carbon-storage and biodiversity-support potential across urban tree species and parks in Bogotá
- Animal Biodiversity during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene in the Zagros Mountains: Evidence from the Wezmeh Cave
BibTeX
@misc{griffith2026unequal,
title = {{The unequal burden of biodiversity reporting}},
author = {Jory Griffith and Melissa Chapman},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.32942/x2169d},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15541/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The unequal burden of biodiversity reporting
AU - Jory Griffith
AU - Melissa Chapman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/15
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2169d
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15541/
AB - Discussions around the first review of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework reveal how the pursuit of more comprehensive measurement can obscure a challenge that will define the post-2030 agenda: ensuring that all countries and stakeholders are able to participate in and be represented by the systems used to evaluate global progress.
ER -