Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

Authentic Sources, Potentially Unsafe Conclusions: Evidence Traceability Does Not Ensure Clinical Reliability in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Perioperative IBD

  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People’s Republic of China
  2. 2Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People’s Republic of China

Abstract

Purpose: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is increasingly used to reduce hallucination in medical large language models (LLMs), but authentic retrieval does not necessarily ensure clinically correct output. We evaluated whether full-text-enriched RAG improves the clinical reliability of locally deployed models for perioperative inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) question answering.

Methods: We constructed a locally deployed full-text IBD perioperative knowledge base and a 50-question high-difficulty benchmark. Two 8B models (Qwen3-VL-8B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B) were evaluated under matched no-retrieval and RAG conditions. Three physicians independently scored clinical accuracy, patient safety, and faithfulness under a source-blinded, format-homogeneous protocol. Evidence traceability was assessed objectively by verifying all retrieved PubMed identifiers (PMIDs) against PubMed.

Results: All retrieved PMIDs existed in PubMed (236 verifications; 187 unique), confirming source-existence authenticity at the retrieval layer. RAG significantly improved Qwen3 accuracy (Δ=+0.44, P<0.001) but not DeepSeek accuracy (Δ=+0.21, P=0.09), and the model-by-retrieval interaction for accuracy was not significant. Patient safety showed no reliable benefit. Faithfulness decreased significantly with RAG on Qwen3 (Δ=−0.24, P<0.001), with a significant model-by-retrieval interaction. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC 0.86–0.93).

Conclusion: PubMed-based retrieval achieved source-existence authenticity but did not consistently improve clinical correctness or safety. Authentic references could accompany incorrect or unsafe conclusions, indicating that evidence traceability and clinical reliability should be evaluated separately. Additional model-external safety mechanisms may be warranted in high-risk settings but require independent validation.

Related

  1. Right ventricular dysfunction during induction of anesthesia in an infant with repaired truncus arteriosus: a case report and learning from a potentially preventable adverse perioperative event
    Jing Sun, Wenqin Zhou
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  2. Smooth Curves, Similar Conclusions? Comparing Linear Regression and GAMLSS Neuropsychological Norms
    B.-E. Kirsebom, I. Myrvoll Lorentzen, J. Espenes +8
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  3. Data Extraction Errors and Diagnostic Conclusions of Meta-Analyses
    Zixing Huang, Yuan Tian, Ping Gong +2
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. When fluency outpaces provenance: source traceability and digital health literacy against AI health misinformation
    Mingsheng Peng, Lu Feng
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Occurrence of Microplastics and Potentially Toxic Elements in Red Sea Crab (Portunus pelagicus) and Squid (Uroteuthis spp.): Contamination and Food-Safety Concerns
    ToxicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{hu2026authentic,
  title = {{Authentic Sources, Potentially Unsafe Conclusions: Evidence Traceability Does Not Ensure Clinical Reliability in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Perioperative IBD}},
  author = {Wenjing Hu and Yaoyao Cai and Liang Sun and Baojun Huang},
  journal = {Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.2147/jmdh.s640102},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s640102},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Authentic Sources, Potentially Unsafe Conclusions: Evidence Traceability Does Not Ensure Clinical Reliability in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Perioperative IBD
AU  - Wenjing Hu
AU  - Yaoyao Cai
AU  - Liang Sun
AU  - Baojun Huang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
DO  - 10.2147/jmdh.s640102
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s640102
AB  - Purpose: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is increasingly used to reduce hallucination in medical large language models (LLMs), but authentic retrieval does not necessarily ensure clinically correct output. We evaluated whether full-text-enriched RAG improves the clinical reliability of locally deployed models for perioperative inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) question answering.  Methods: We constructed a locally deployed full-text IBD perioperative knowledge base and a 50-question high-difficulty benchmark. Two 8B models (Qwen3-VL-8B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B) were evaluated under matched no-retrieval and RAG conditions. Three physicians independently scored clinical accuracy, patient safety, and faithfulness under a source-blinded, format-homogeneous protocol. Evidence traceability was assessed objectively by verifying all retrieved PubMed identifiers (PMIDs) against PubMed.  Results: All retrieved PMIDs existed in PubMed (236 verifications; 187 unique), confirming source-existence authenticity at the retrieval layer. RAG significantly improved Qwen3 accuracy (Δ=+0.44, P<0.001) but not DeepSeek accuracy (Δ=+0.21, P=0.09), and the model-by-retrieval interaction for accuracy was not significant. Patient safety showed no reliable benefit. Faithfulness decreased significantly with RAG on Qwen3 (Δ=−0.24, P<0.001), with a significant model-by-retrieval interaction. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC 0.86–0.93).  Conclusion: PubMed-based retrieval achieved source-existence authenticity but did not consistently improve clinical correctness or safety. Authentic references could accompany incorrect or unsafe conclusions, indicating that evidence traceability and clinical reliability should be evaluated separately. Additional model-external safety mechanisms may be warranted in high-risk settings but require independent validation.
SN  - 1178-2390
ER  -