Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,787 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety

Edible Biopolymer Coatings for Postharvest Preservation in Warm-Chain Horticultural Supply Chain: Mechanisms, Materials, Design Strategies, and Future Directions.

  1. 1School of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, South Africa.

Abstract

Fresh fruit and vegetable postharvest losses reach 30%-50% between harvest and consumption, concentrated in low- and middle-income countries where warm-chain supply chains (20°C-35°C, 55%-85% relative humidity, intermittent handling) replace the refrigerated cold chains conventional technology assumes. Edible coatings from polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids offer a non-refrigeration postharvest intervention, with efficacy confirmed under controlled laboratory conditions, but commercial adoption remains marginal. This review argues that the gap between laboratory performance and field outcomes is primarily a systems-design failure, in which existing formulations optimized for stable, refrigerated conditions are not engineered to maintain function under warm-chain variability. Biopolymer materials face a three-axis trade-off, unable to simultaneously satisfy moisture barrier performance, gas exchange selectivity, and thermal-hygroscopic stability, and all three degrade predictably under warm-chain conditions through mechanisms current formulation design does not account for. Bioactive release kinetics compound this failure by depleting protection before supply chain completion, while the absence of a commodity classification framework makes the research literature noncumulative. This review makes three contributions. It provides, to the authors' knowledge, among the first integrated analyses of biopolymer coating performance failure under warm-chain conditions, distinguished by its deployment-focused approach rather than a materials-cataloging one. It formalizes this into a three-axis framework showing that composite design is physically necessary for warm-chain applications, and proposes a four-pillar warm-chain design framework comprising predictive formulation modeling, controlled-release calibration, commodity-specific coating architecture, and standardized warm-chain validation protocols. A six-phase implementation pipeline and a commodity-specific application matrix operationalize this framework into a demonstrable pathway from formulation to field deployment.

Related

  1. Biopolymer-Based Nanocomposite Edible Coatings for Postharvest Preservation of Horticultural Crops: Mechanisms, Functional Additives, and Safety Perspectives
    Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem, Yusuf Ola Mukaila, Marissa Pérez-Alvarez +2
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Plant biologyCrossref
  2. From prediction to actionable mechanisms: Explainable multi‑omics AI for farm‑to‑fork postharvest preservation
    Peihua Ma, Xiaoxue Jia, Bei Fan +9
    iMetaPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  3. Post-slaughter poultry meat preservation for sustainable food systems: Mechanisms, microbial safety, shelf-life extension, and emerging preservation strategies
    Rabin Raut, Zahidul Hasan Tushar, Roshik Shrestha +4
    Poultry sciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMC
  4. Fungal melanin as a bioactive biopolymer: structural diversity, oxidative stress modulation, anticancer mechanisms, and therapeutic perspectives.
    Asmaa E Kassab, Ehab M Gedawy
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textCell biologyEurope PMC
  5. Invasive alien plants of horticultural origin growing in Zimbabwe: Analysis of control mechanisms and management.
    Alfred Maroyi
    Student's Journal of Health Research AfricaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEcologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{olarewaju2026edible,
  title = {{Edible Biopolymer Coatings for Postharvest Preservation in Warm-Chain Horticultural Supply Chain: Mechanisms, Materials, Design Strategies, and Future Directions.}},
  author = {Olaoluwa Omoniyi Olarewaju and Olufunke Omowumi Fajinmi},
  journal = {Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1111/1541-4337.70675},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42892746},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Edible Biopolymer Coatings for Postharvest Preservation in Warm-Chain Horticultural Supply Chain: Mechanisms, Materials, Design Strategies, and Future Directions.
AU  - Olaoluwa Omoniyi Olarewaju
AU  - Olufunke Omowumi Fajinmi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety
DO  - 10.1111/1541-4337.70675
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42892746
AB  - Fresh fruit and vegetable postharvest losses reach 30%-50% between harvest and consumption, concentrated in low- and middle-income countries where warm-chain supply chains (20°C-35°C, 55%-85% relative humidity, intermittent handling) replace the refrigerated cold chains conventional technology assumes. Edible coatings from polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids offer a non-refrigeration postharvest intervention, with efficacy confirmed under controlled laboratory conditions, but commercial adoption remains marginal. This review argues that the gap between laboratory performance and field outcomes is primarily a systems-design failure, in which existing formulations optimized for stable, refrigerated conditions are not engineered to maintain function under warm-chain variability. Biopolymer materials face a three-axis trade-off, unable to simultaneously satisfy moisture barrier performance, gas exchange selectivity, and thermal-hygroscopic stability, and all three degrade predictably under warm-chain conditions through mechanisms current formulation design does not account for. Bioactive release kinetics compound this failure by depleting protection before supply chain completion, while the absence of a commodity classification framework makes the research literature noncumulative. This review makes three contributions. It provides, to the authors' knowledge, among the first integrated analyses of biopolymer coating performance failure under warm-chain conditions, distinguished by its deployment-focused approach rather than a materials-cataloging one. It formalizes this into a three-axis framework showing that composite design is physically necessary for warm-chain applications, and proposes a four-pillar warm-chain design framework comprising predictive formulation modeling, controlled-release calibration, commodity-specific coating architecture, and standardized warm-chain validation protocols. A six-phase implementation pipeline and a commodity-specific application matrix operationalize this framework into a demonstrable pathway from formulation to field deployment.
SN  - 1541-4337
ER  -