Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
174,684 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0JAMA Network Open

Full-Service Mobile Food Markets and Dietary Quality in Low-Income Housing Communities

  • Melissa Lynn Horning1
  • Kristen Skovbroten Gorman1
  • Stephanie Wagner2
  • Jayne Allyn Fulkerson1
  • Melissa Nelson Laska3
  • Julian Wolfson4
  • Jiayi Hu4
  • Yijie Wang4
  • Lisa Harnack3
4 affiliations
  1. 1School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  2. 2The Food Group, New Hope, Minnesota
  3. 3Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  4. 4Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Open at sourceDOICite

Abstract

Importance: Full-service mobile markets, also known as grocery stores on wheels, may improve diet-related outcomes by bringing low-cost, nutritious food to individuals experiencing low incomes and low food access.

Objective: To determine the impact of the full-service Twin Cities Mobile Market on dietary outcomes in low-income communities.

Design, Setting, Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted over 3 waves (January 2022 to October 2025) across 12 public or private subsidized housing sites in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, area. Participants were screened for interest in the mobile market. Follow-up assessments began after 6 months of market service. Analyses were finalized September 2026.

Intervention: Sites were randomized to weekly market service or waiting list control groups.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome: diet quality (Healthy Eating Index-2020 via 24-hour recalls). A priori secondary outcomes: dietary intake (fruit and vegetable, energy, sodium, and percentage of calories from added sugar), food security (18-item US Department of Agriculture Food Security Screening Module), and fruit and vegetable servings procured for the home (validated tracking tool). Adjusted intention-to-treat (ITT) generalized estimating equations were used to assess outcome differences between treatment groups.

Results: Among 262 adults who enrolled in the mobile market study, 242 participants (mean [SD] age, 66.5 [11.5] years; 156 women [64.5%]) across 12 sites completed baseline assessments and were randomized to mobile market service or waiting list control groups. There were 137 individuals (56.6%) who received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Sites had a mean (SD) of 18.2 (4.4) weekly transactions (mean of 110 of 1071 households [10.3%]). Of 109 intervention site participants, 47 individuals (43.1%) shopped at the mobile market 1 or more times in implementation months 5 to 6, while 90 of 94 individuals who reported ever using the market (95.7%) reported that they would recommend the market service. Participant retention was 218 of 242 participants (90.0%). In ITT models, the primary outcome of diet quality (adjusted mean difference, 1.25 [95% CI, −1.60 to 4.10]) among 215 participants and 6 of 7 secondary outcomes (fruit and vegetable, energy, and added sugar intake; food security and food security improvement; fruit and vegetable procurement) were not significantly different between groups. Intervention site participants consumed an adjusted mean difference of 397 mg (95% CI, −636 to −158 mg) less sodium daily compared with participants in the waiting list control group. Main findings were consistent across 4 sensitivity and supplemental analyses, except the per-protocol sensitivity analysis, which found that participants in the intervention group consumed an adjusted mean difference of 2.35% (95% CI, 0.66%-4.04%) more calories from added sugar compared with the control group.

Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, satisfaction with the mobile market was high, but the mobile market did not improve diet quality or most outcomes examined. The mobile market was associated with a meaningful sodium reduction that could improve population-level health.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05672186

Related

  1. From Housing to Hotspots: Integrating a Housing-Based Measure of Individual Socioeconomic Status with Geospatial Analysis to Target Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Communities
    R. Yao, C.-I. Wi, M. J. Beenken +27
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Journey to immunization service: identifying barriers and enablers to routine immunization service uptake among communities residing in urban slum areas of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023
    Eshetu Girma, Finina Abebe, Hnin Su Mon +12
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. An exploratory Kano survey of community sports service demands among participating older adults in six selected Wuhan communities
    Wei Zheng, Yanwei Zhao
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiers
  4. Importance-performance gap analysis of health service quality in conflict-affected Yemen: a cross-sectional facility-based survey of patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives
    Dalia Hyzam, Fekri Dureab, Mustafa Dhaiban +6
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  5. Changes in Eating Competence and Its Association with Dietary and Clinical Outcomes in Brazilian Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes or Prediabetes Attending a Public Health Service
    Rafaella Dusi, Raíza Rana de Souza Lima Trombini, Silvana Schwerz Funghetto +4
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{horning2026fullservice,
  title = {{Full-Service Mobile Food Markets and Dietary Quality in Low-Income Housing Communities}},
  author = {Melissa Lynn Horning and Kristen Skovbroten Gorman and Stephanie Wagner and Jayne Allyn Fulkerson and Melissa Nelson Laska and Julian Wolfson and Jiayi Hu and Yijie Wang and Lisa Harnack},
  journal = {JAMA Network Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.46816},
  url = {https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2856240},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Full-Service Mobile Food Markets and Dietary Quality in Low-Income Housing Communities
AU  - Melissa Lynn Horning
AU  - Kristen Skovbroten Gorman
AU  - Stephanie Wagner
AU  - Jayne Allyn Fulkerson
AU  - Melissa Nelson Laska
AU  - Julian Wolfson
AU  - Jiayi Hu
AU  - Yijie Wang
AU  - Lisa Harnack
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - JAMA Network Open
DO  - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.46816
UR  - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2856240
AB  - Importance: Full-service mobile markets, also known as grocery stores on wheels, may improve diet-related outcomes by bringing low-cost, nutritious food to individuals experiencing low incomes and low food access.  Objective: To determine the impact of the full-service Twin Cities Mobile Market on dietary outcomes in low-income communities.  Design, Setting, Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted over 3 waves (January 2022 to October 2025) across 12 public or private subsidized housing sites in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, area. Participants were screened for interest in the mobile market. Follow-up assessments began after 6 months of market service. Analyses were finalized September 2026.  Intervention: Sites were randomized to weekly market service or waiting list control groups.  Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome: diet quality (Healthy Eating Index-2020 via 24-hour recalls). A priori secondary outcomes: dietary intake (fruit and vegetable, energy, sodium, and percentage of calories from added sugar), food security (18-item US Department of Agriculture Food Security Screening Module), and fruit and vegetable servings procured for the home (validated tracking tool). Adjusted intention-to-treat (ITT) generalized estimating equations were used to assess outcome differences between treatment groups.  Results: Among 262 adults who enrolled in the mobile market study, 242 participants (mean [SD] age, 66.5 [11.5] years; 156 women [64.5%]) across 12 sites completed baseline assessments and were randomized to mobile market service or waiting list control groups. There were 137 individuals (56.6%) who received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Sites had a mean (SD) of 18.2 (4.4) weekly transactions (mean of 110 of 1071 households [10.3%]). Of 109 intervention site participants, 47 individuals (43.1%) shopped at the mobile market 1 or more times in implementation months 5 to 6, while 90 of 94 individuals who reported ever using the market (95.7%) reported that they would recommend the market service. Participant retention was 218 of 242 participants (90.0%). In ITT models, the primary outcome of diet quality (adjusted mean difference, 1.25 [95% CI, −1.60 to 4.10]) among 215 participants and 6 of 7 secondary outcomes (fruit and vegetable, energy, and added sugar intake; food security and food security improvement; fruit and vegetable procurement) were not significantly different between groups. Intervention site participants consumed an adjusted mean difference of 397 mg (95% CI, −636 to −158 mg) less sodium daily compared with participants in the waiting list control group. Main findings were consistent across 4 sensitivity and supplemental analyses, except the per-protocol sensitivity analysis, which found that participants in the intervention group consumed an adjusted mean difference of 2.35% (95% CI, 0.66%-4.04%) more calories from added sugar compared with the control group.  Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, satisfaction with the mobile market was high, but the mobile market did not improve diet quality or most outcomes examined. The mobile market was associated with a meaningful sodium reduction that could improve population-level health.  Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05672186
SN  - 2574-3805
ER  -