Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Hankel--Christoffel--Nevai Screening for Bayesian Inverse Problems

Abstract

Likelihood evaluation in Bayesian inverse problems often requires a forward-model solve. We study candidate screening using a likelihood-weighted prior moment matrix and two associated scores: a Christoffel ratio and a Nevai polynomial average. A finite pilot supplies likelihood information that is reused to rank further prior candidates. We connect finite-pilot matrix error, quantitative Legendre localization, and fixed-budget posterior-mass regret. Conditional likelihoods distinguish feature loss from polynomial and sampling errors, and a filtered Gaussian construction permits controlled feature selection and localization. In a nonlinear function-coefficient PDE, equal-budget comparisons separate methods using scalar likelihoods from surrogates using forward outputs. The Christoffel ratio outperforms the tested direct likelihood regressions, but forward-response surrogates capture more posterior mass at small retention budgets. Independent-pilot tests and reference resampling quantify two distinct sources of uncertainty. Controlled Gaussian experiments illustrate finite-filter truncation and the benefit of selecting relevant features. These results identify when moment geometry provides useful screening information, without asserting universal superiority over surrogate models or an exact posterior sampling method.

Related

  1. Accelerating posterior sampling in Bayesian inverse problems with diffusion models: an online-offline perspective
    Duc-Lam Duong
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingStatisticsarXiv
  2. PDE-based Bayesian Inverse Problems in All-at-once Framework
    Tram Thi Ngoc Nguyen, Fabian Schneider, Leila Taghizadeh
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingProbabilityarXiv
  3. Exact Likelihood-Coin Poisson Sampling for Bayesian Inverse Problems with Sharp Complexity Bounds
    Zhiliang Deng, Xiaomei Yang
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
  4. Flow Matching for Fast Posterior Sampling in Bayesian Inverse Problems
    Jan Blechschmidt, Oliver G. Ernst, Moritz Poguntke +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingStatisticsarXiv
  5. A pedestrian's approach to Bayesian methods for inverse problems
    Heiko Gimperlein, Michael Oberguggenberger
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{deng2026hankelchristoffelnevai,
  title = {{Hankel--Christoffel--Nevai Screening for Bayesian Inverse Problems}},
  author = {Zhiliang Deng and Xiaomei Yang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.20711},
  eprint = {2609.20711},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20711},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hankel--Christoffel--Nevai Screening for Bayesian Inverse Problems
AU  - Zhiliang Deng
AU  - Xiaomei Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.20711
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20711
AB  - Likelihood evaluation in Bayesian inverse problems often requires a forward-model solve. We study candidate screening using a likelihood-weighted prior moment matrix and two associated scores: a Christoffel ratio and a Nevai polynomial average. A finite pilot supplies likelihood information that is reused to rank further prior candidates. We connect finite-pilot matrix error, quantitative Legendre localization, and fixed-budget posterior-mass regret. Conditional likelihoods distinguish feature loss from polynomial and sampling errors, and a filtered Gaussian construction permits controlled feature selection and localization. In a nonlinear function-coefficient PDE, equal-budget comparisons separate methods using scalar likelihoods from surrogates using forward outputs. The Christoffel ratio outperforms the tested direct likelihood regressions, but forward-response surrogates capture more posterior mass at small retention budgets. Independent-pilot tests and reference resampling quantify two distinct sources of uncertainty. Controlled Gaussian experiments illustrate finite-filter truncation and the benefit of selecting relevant features. These results identify when moment geometry provides useful screening information, without asserting universal superiority over surrogate models or an exact posterior sampling method.
ER  -