Organizational Motivation and Ethical Worldviews: Anthropocentrism versus Biocentrism in Climate Stabilization

Abstract

This analytical paper investigates the ethical frameworks governing global conservation organizations, utilizing Conservation International as an organizational case model. The study contrasts anthropocentric (resource utility) and biocentric (intrinsic value) paradigms, illustrating how diverse philosophical rationales converge on the vital need for planetary climate stabilization, greenhouse gas abatement, and biodiversity preservation. Strategic recommendations emphasize multi channel financial diversification to sustain longterm environmental stewardship and project capacity.

Indirect associations involving four work-motivation dimensions between perceived organizational climate and work engagement among geriatric nursing assistants in China: a cross-sectional study
Jing Zhou, Xi Zhou, Mengru Wang +3
BMC Nursing30 Sep 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPMC
Persistent mixed worldviews in the theory of chosen preferences
Ziran Liu
arXiv16 Sep 2026PreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
The effect of organizational justice on employees’ positive organizational behavior through perceived organizational support and organization-based self-esteem
Chen Mengyan, Pan Xiaofu, Zhang Hanting
Scientific Reports20 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCrossref
Intrinsic Religious Motivation and Athlete Motivation from a Positive Psychology Perspective: Serial Mediation via Well-Being and Self-Confidence
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)1 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
Artificial intelligence adoption and organizational efficiency: the mediating role of organizational learning capability and moderating role of digital literacy
Hayford Asare Obeng, Richard Arhinful, Leviticus Mensah +1
Frontiers in artificial intelligence16 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{hicks2026organizational,
  title = {{Organizational Motivation and Ethical Worldviews: Anthropocentrism versus Biocentrism in Climate Stabilization}},
  author = {Robert Hicks},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23631322},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23631322},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Organizational Motivation and Ethical Worldviews: Anthropocentrism versus Biocentrism in Climate Stabilization
AU  - Robert Hicks
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23631322
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23631322
AB  - This analytical paper investigates the ethical frameworks governing global conservation organizations, utilizing Conservation International as an organizational case model. The study contrasts anthropocentric (resource utility) and biocentric (intrinsic value) paradigms, illustrating how diverse philosophical rationales converge on the vital need for planetary climate stabilization, greenhouse gas abatement, and biodiversity preservation. Strategic recommendations emphasize multi channel financial diversification to sustain longterm environmental stewardship and project capacity.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite