Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDNPJ systems biology and applications

Decoding gene responsiveness to synthetic chromatin reader-actuators with multi-modal epigenomic profiling.

  • Seong Hu Kim1
  • Isioma Enwerem-Lackland1
  • Natecia L Williams1
  • Rachel Fisher2
  • Christopher Plaisier2,3
  • Karmella A Haynes4
4 affiliations
  1. 1Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  2. 2School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
  3. 3John Schufeldt School of Medicine and Medical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
  4. 4Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. [email protected].
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Cell identity is regulated by chromatin states that encode gene regulatory memory and shape responses to new inputs. To investigate how chromatin context influences inducibility in differentiated cells, we employed engineered synthetic reader-actuators (SRAs), fusion proteins containing the polycomb chromodomain (PCD) that binds H3K27me3. In MCF7 breast cancer cells, we mapped PCD-fusion occupancy by ChIP-seq and used RNA-seq to identify temporally resolved gene activation patterns. ChIP-seq profiling and machine learning models (MLM) demonstrated that PCD-fusion binding was predicted primarily by the absence of H3K4me3 or H3K9ac enrichment, suggesting selective accessibility at enhancers and chromatin transition zones. Among genes with SRA-enriched enhancers, the SRA-induced subset was distinguished by promoter features including bivalent histone modifications and enrichment of transcription factors NEUROD1 and MTA1. Collectively, our results demonstrate that SRA responsiveness depends on a specific chromatin signature beyond H3K27me3 alone. This study demonstrates the power of SRAs to dissect inducible chromatin features in their native genomic context, and suggests that epigenetically repressed regions in differentiated cells can retain regulatory plasticity.

Related

  1. JuxtaBAM: a species and SNP-independent method to validate the integrity of joint epigenomic and transcriptomic profiling datasets
    Milad Razavi-Mohseni, Michael A. Beer
    BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  2. Protocol for profiling chromatin accessibility in human small-cell lung cancer FFPE-derived samples using Omni-ATAC-seq
    Eralda Salataj, Kenta Kawasaki, Joan Massagué +4
    STAR protocolsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCPMC
  3. Chromatin and transcription factor profiling in rare stem cell populations using CUT&Tag
    Yuefeng Li, Kiran Nakka, Thomas Olender +11
    STAR ProtocolsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND28 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationHAL
  4. integrating single-cell transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility profiling to decipher the molecular landscape of Hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kaile Pan, Lijian Chen, Yitao Zheng
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPLOS
  5. The role of gene regulatory evolution in weapon diversification: Insights from comparative genomics, chromatin profiling, and functional analyses of BMP signaling in horned beetles
    Phillip L Davidson, Isabel G Manley, Armin P Moczek
    PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationCell biologyPLOSEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{kim2026decoding,
  title = {{Decoding gene responsiveness to synthetic chromatin reader-actuators with multi-modal epigenomic profiling.}},
  author = {Seong Hu Kim and Isioma Enwerem-Lackland and Natecia L Williams and Rachel Fisher and Christopher Plaisier and Karmella A Haynes},
  journal = {NPJ systems biology and applications},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1038/s41540-026-00781-5},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42919852},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Decoding gene responsiveness to synthetic chromatin reader-actuators with multi-modal epigenomic profiling.
AU  - Seong Hu Kim
AU  - Isioma Enwerem-Lackland
AU  - Natecia L Williams
AU  - Rachel Fisher
AU  - Christopher Plaisier
AU  - Karmella A Haynes
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - NPJ systems biology and applications
DO  - 10.1038/s41540-026-00781-5
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42919852
AB  - Cell identity is regulated by chromatin states that encode gene regulatory memory and shape responses to new inputs. To investigate how chromatin context influences inducibility in differentiated cells, we employed engineered synthetic reader-actuators (SRAs), fusion proteins containing the polycomb chromodomain (PCD) that binds H3K27me3. In MCF7 breast cancer cells, we mapped PCD-fusion occupancy by ChIP-seq and used RNA-seq to identify temporally resolved gene activation patterns. ChIP-seq profiling and machine learning models (MLM) demonstrated that PCD-fusion binding was predicted primarily by the absence of H3K4me3 or H3K9ac enrichment, suggesting selective accessibility at enhancers and chromatin transition zones. Among genes with SRA-enriched enhancers, the SRA-induced subset was distinguished by promoter features including bivalent histone modifications and enrichment of transcription factors NEUROD1 and MTA1. Collectively, our results demonstrate that SRA responsiveness depends on a specific chromatin signature beyond H3K27me3 alone. This study demonstrates the power of SRAs to dissect inducible chromatin features in their native genomic context, and suggests that epigenetically repressed regions in differentiated cells can retain regulatory plasticity.
SN  - 2056-7189
ER  -