PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
On-device redaction for field-service photos: 120ms vs service level, redact or skip
Abstract
No public benchmark publishes a per-device redaction latency figure; measure your own fleet's three most common capture types against a 120 ms budget.
Independent technical note mirroring the canonical version: https://technician.dev/blog/on-device-redaction-for-field-service-photos-120ms-vs-service-level-redact-or-skip.php
Related
- Latent Profiles of Intelligent Service and Device Use among Adolescents
- Unifying Field and Temperature Acceleration in Semiconductor Device Reliability Through Entropic Kinetics
- Field Service Routing: 14% Cost-to-Serve vs Union Seniority/Hours-of-Service Split
- Automatic unloading control system for corn field residual film baling device based on a load cell
- LAA occluder device impeding pulsed field ablation of an anterior mitral line: a case report about the role of a dual energy source
BibTeX
@misc{pierce2026ondevice,
title = {{On-device redaction for field-service photos: 120ms vs service level, redact or skip}},
author = {Chase Pierce},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23653164},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23653164},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - On-device redaction for field-service photos: 120ms vs service level, redact or skip
AU - Chase Pierce
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23653164
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23653164
AB - No public benchmark publishes a per-device redaction latency figure; measure your own fleet's three most common capture types against a 120 ms budget. Independent technical note mirroring the canonical version: https://technician.dev/blog/on-device-redaction-for-field-service-photos-120ms-vs-service-level-redact-or-skip.php
ER -