Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology

Evidence-based design of a patient-specific quality assurance program through retrospective analysis of pretreatment and in vivo results.

  1. 1Maastro, Maastricht Radiation Oncology Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Background and purpose

As radiotherapy techniques become increasingly complex, patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) must evolve to detect a broad spectrum of potential failure modes across the treatment chain. This study presents a extensive evaluation of a multi-modal PSQA program by assessing its ability to detect clinically relevant failure modes and quantifying its efficacy.Materials and methods

A five-year retrospective analysis was conducted of an integrated PSQA program implemented at Maastro, combining secondary dose calculations, log-file based verification, and Electronic Portal Dosimetry (EPD) in both pretreatment and in vivo workflows. The efficacy of individual QA methods and the overall program was quantified using positive predictive values (PPVs). PSQA outcomes were linked to potential improvements in treatment planning strategies and delivery techniques.Results

A total of 18,558 treatment plans were analyzed in the pretreatment workflow and 1817 treatment plans in the in vivo workflow. Nearly all high-priority failure modes could be detected except machine output miscalibration. Combining PSQA methods substantially improved PPVs across failure categories. The in vivo workflow flagged the most failure modes and additionally gives insight into possible improvements in planning strategies or treatment techniques.Conclusions

This retrospective analysis demonstrated that a comprehensive framework incorporating independent, purpose-specific PSQA methods is essential to detect a wide range of treatment deviations. Combining complementary methods improves the reliability and interpretability of results. The clinical impact of a PSQA program can be further enhanced by adopting more clinically meaningful evaluation metrics and using the results to guide the optimization of new treatment strategies.

Related

  1. Beyond Gamma Analysis: An Accessibility-oriented Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Patient-specific Radiotherapy Quality Assurance
    Vikram, Raj Pal Singh, Manindra Bhushan
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  2. Characterization and Validation of MicroDiamond Detectors in Patient-specific Quality Assurance of Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy
    Sanjana Choudhary, Chithra Krishnamoorthy, Radhakrishnan B. Nair +2
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  3. A deep learning approach for EPID-based patient-specific quality assurance incorporating daily machine-state variations
    Kihong Pak, Sung-woo Kim, Kyeongyun Park +5
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Daily Multi‐Leaf Collimator positional error prediction using machine learning: A Dynalog‐based approach for patient specific quality assurance
    Samira Aghaei Akizi, Seyed Mahmoud Reza Aghamiri, Zahra Siavashpour +2
    Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationPMC
  5. Integrated Mandibular Digital Twin: From Automated Modeling to Patient-Specific Implant Design
    Lilian Baugnon, Georges Carpentier, Nicolas Bethune +2
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
BibTeX
@article{decabooter2026evidencebased,
  title = {{Evidence-based design of a patient-specific quality assurance program through retrospective analysis of pretreatment and in vivo results.}},
  author = {Esther Decabooter and Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten},
  journal = {Physics and imaging in radiation oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.phro.2026.101106},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903664},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evidence-based design of a patient-specific quality assurance program through retrospective analysis of pretreatment and in vivo results.
AU  - Esther Decabooter
AU  - Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
DO  - 10.1016/j.phro.2026.101106
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903664
AB  - Background and purpose  As radiotherapy techniques become increasingly complex, patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) must evolve to detect a broad spectrum of potential failure modes across the treatment chain. This study presents a extensive evaluation of a multi-modal PSQA program by assessing its ability to detect clinically relevant failure modes and quantifying its efficacy.Materials and methods  A five-year retrospective analysis was conducted of an integrated PSQA program implemented at Maastro, combining secondary dose calculations, log-file based verification, and Electronic Portal Dosimetry (EPD) in both pretreatment and in vivo workflows. The efficacy of individual QA methods and the overall program was quantified using positive predictive values (PPVs). PSQA outcomes were linked to potential improvements in treatment planning strategies and delivery techniques.Results  A total of 18,558 treatment plans were analyzed in the pretreatment workflow and 1817 treatment plans in the in vivo workflow. Nearly all high-priority failure modes could be detected except machine output miscalibration. Combining PSQA methods substantially improved PPVs across failure categories. The in vivo workflow flagged the most failure modes and additionally gives insight into possible improvements in planning strategies or treatment techniques.Conclusions  This retrospective analysis demonstrated that a comprehensive framework incorporating independent, purpose-specific PSQA methods is essential to detect a wide range of treatment deviations. Combining complementary methods improves the reliability and interpretability of results. The clinical impact of a PSQA program can be further enhanced by adopting more clinically meaningful evaluation metrics and using the results to guide the optimization of new treatment strategies.
SN  - 2405-6316
ER  -