Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

On Bayesian Mechanics: An Economics of and by Beliefs

  1. 1Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Augusto Rodin 498, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico
  2. 2Fintropic AI, Dover, DE 19904, USA

Abstract

We develop Bayesian Mechanics Portfolio Theory (BMPT), which represents an investor as an agent that infers hidden market states, encodes preferences, evaluates policies by expected free energy, and acts. We first prove a boundary theorem showing that if actions change neither the admissible observation channel nor the transition law of the latent state, expected information gain is policy invariant, so policy rankings are determined by pragmatic value, implementation terms, and any nonuniform policy prior. Under a mean–variance-compatible pragmatic cost, BMPT recovers the subjective tangency portfolio at this boundary. We instantiate BMPT as Causal Hierarchical Active Inference (CHAI), a hierarchy of coupled generative-model layers around a hierarchical risk parity base. A prospectively registered walk-forward exercise on twelve exchange-traded funds serves as an implementation demonstration, not as a test of trading-strategy outperformance. CHAI is classified as a tie against its matched base; the Sharpe ratio difference is −0.023 (90% interval [−0.037,−0.009]), with the interval inside the prespecified equivalence margin. A constructed action-gated environment restores policy-specific epistemic value. BMPT therefore provides a broader, explicit, auditable, and causally disciplined model of adaptive portfolio choice; the paper does not claim superior realized returns.

Related

  1. Time Emergence in Economics: Conceptual Transpositions from Quantum Systems
    Esteban Céspedes, Oscar Orellana
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textMathematical physicsGeneral physicsHAL
  2. Filtering without recursion and some of its uses in financial economics
    Simon Donker van Heel, Neil Shephard
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Optimal Transport in Economics
    Amine Fahli, Alfred Galichon
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. From Weakly Supervised Segmentation to Diagnostic Decisions: An Annotation-Economics Review for Medical Imaging
    Xiu Shu, Xinming Zhang, Di Yuan
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  5. Event-Native Immersive Communication for 6G: From Multimodal Streams to Event Beliefs
    Yiyang Zhu, Li Wei, Chau Yuen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{montanezjacquez2026bayesian,
  title = {{On Bayesian Mechanics: An Economics of and by Beliefs}},
  author = {Samuel Montañez-Jacquez and Ernesto Moya-Albor},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/math14203795},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3795},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - On Bayesian Mechanics: An Economics of and by Beliefs
AU  - Samuel Montañez-Jacquez
AU  - Ernesto Moya-Albor
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14203795
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3795
AB  - We develop Bayesian Mechanics Portfolio Theory (BMPT), which represents an investor as an agent that infers hidden market states, encodes preferences, evaluates policies by expected free energy, and acts. We first prove a boundary theorem showing that if actions change neither the admissible observation channel nor the transition law of the latent state, expected information gain is policy invariant, so policy rankings are determined by pragmatic value, implementation terms, and any nonuniform policy prior. Under a mean–variance-compatible pragmatic cost, BMPT recovers the subjective tangency portfolio at this boundary. We instantiate BMPT as Causal Hierarchical Active Inference (CHAI), a hierarchy of coupled generative-model layers around a hierarchical risk parity base. A prospectively registered walk-forward exercise on twelve exchange-traded funds serves as an implementation demonstration, not as a test of trading-strategy outperformance. CHAI is classified as a tie against its matched base; the Sharpe ratio difference is −0.023 (90% interval [−0.037,−0.009]), with the interval inside the prespecified equivalence margin. A constructed action-gated environment restores policy-specific epistemic value. BMPT therefore provides a broader, explicit, auditable, and causally disciplined model of adaptive portfolio choice; the paper does not claim superior realized returns.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -