Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Social inequalities in students’ resilience and school well-being in Germany: a multilevel analysis

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence that students’ well-being and resilience have declined in recent years in Germany and other countries, with multiple social inequalities observed in both domains.

Objectives: To what extent are specific social determinants associated with students’ resilience and school-related well-being?

Methods: The data are based on a non-representative survey of students in grades 3 to 13 (N = 1,200), conducted during the 2024/25 school year across 36 primary and secondary schools in Lower Saxony and North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Additional data on social deprivation, municipality-level population size, and school type were merged from official statistics. Three-level multilevel analyses (L1: student, L2: school, L3: municipality) with random intercepts were performed.

Results: The following factors were associated with school well-being and resilience, respectively: grade level (ns / ns), female students (B = 0.187, p < .001 / ns) and non-binary students (ns / ns), high socioeconomic status (B = 0.044, p = .002 / B = 0.025, p = .03), single-parent family (B = -0.200, p = .003 / B = -0.140, p = .01), stepfamily (B = -0.184, p = .05 / ns), other family form (ns / B = 0.473, p = .02), siblings in the household (ns / ns), one-sided migration background (B = -0.144, p = .01 / ns), two-sided migration background (ns / ns), language spoken at home (ns / ns), population size (ns / ns), social deprivation (ns / ns), as well as primary school (B = 0.545, p < .001 / B = 0.611, p < .001), Gymnasium (university-preparatory secondary school; ns / ns), and comprehensive school (ns / ns).

Discussion: The findings indicate multiple social inequalities in both school well-being and resilience, particularly among students with low socioeconomic status, a one-sided migration background, and those from single-parent or stepfamilies. Study limitations are discussed.

Key messages: • Students from socioeconomically disadvantaged, migrant, and non-traditional family backgrounds show lower levels of well-being and resilience.

• Measures to promote well-being and resilience should address social inequalities at the individual level and consider school-related contextual factors.

Related

  1. Insights from a workshop on climate-resilience in health systems in Japan and Germany: strategies to counteract social isolation and heat health risks for older adults
    Alina Herrmann, Asuna Arai, Xerxes Seposo +4
    Environmental Health and Preventive MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyJ-STAGE
  2. Preparedness, awareness and ownership of young future healthcare professionals are associated with their willingness to contribute to health system resilience in a NATO collective defense scenario: a cross-sectional study among medical, nursing and paramedic students in Germany
    Lara Amling, Isabella Beyer, Felix Hambitzer +4
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Regional and socioeconomic inequalities and factors associated with low birth weight in Ghana: a multilevel analysis of the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey
    Samuel Antwi, Mabel Pokua Amoako-Boateng, John Kuumuori Ganle +7
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Multilevel predictors of interpersonal social health: findings from the social health survey in urban Iran
    Fardin Alipour, Yahya Salimi, Hassan Rafiey +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Regional inequalities in maternal-level under-five mortality in Ethiopia: evidence from the 2019 Mini-DHS using multilevel negative binomial and Bayesian models.
    Melkamu Chafamo Joche, B Muniswamy, B Punyavathi
    BMC public healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{unlureske2026social,
  title = {{Social inequalities in students’ resilience and school well-being in Germany: a multilevel analysis}},
  author = {S Ünlü-Reske and R Brender and A Brager and C Meyer and U Walter and D Röding},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.2033},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.2033},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Social inequalities in students’ resilience and school well-being in Germany: a multilevel analysis
AU  - S Ünlü-Reske
AU  - R Brender
AU  - A Brager
AU  - C Meyer
AU  - U Walter
AU  - D Röding
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.2033
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.2033
AB  - Background: There is growing evidence that students’ well-being and resilience have declined in recent years in Germany and other countries, with multiple social inequalities observed in both domains.  Objectives: To what extent are specific social determinants associated with students’ resilience and school-related well-being?  Methods: The data are based on a non-representative survey of students in grades 3 to 13 (N = 1,200), conducted during the 2024/25 school year across 36 primary and secondary schools in Lower Saxony and North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Additional data on social deprivation, municipality-level population size, and school type were merged from official statistics. Three-level multilevel analyses (L1: student, L2: school, L3: municipality) with random intercepts were performed.  Results: The following factors were associated with school well-being and resilience, respectively: grade level (ns / ns), female students (B = 0.187, p < .001 / ns) and non-binary students (ns / ns), high socioeconomic status (B = 0.044, p = .002 / B = 0.025, p = .03), single-parent family (B = -0.200, p = .003 / B = -0.140, p = .01), stepfamily (B = -0.184, p = .05 / ns), other family form (ns / B = 0.473, p = .02), siblings in the household (ns / ns), one-sided migration background (B = -0.144, p = .01 / ns), two-sided migration background (ns / ns), language spoken at home (ns / ns), population size (ns / ns), social deprivation (ns / ns), as well as primary school (B = 0.545, p < .001 / B = 0.611, p < .001), Gymnasium (university-preparatory secondary school; ns / ns), and comprehensive school (ns / ns).  Discussion: The findings indicate multiple social inequalities in both school well-being and resilience, particularly among students with low socioeconomic status, a one-sided migration background, and those from single-parent or stepfamilies. Study limitations are discussed.  Key messages: • Students from socioeconomically disadvantaged, migrant, and non-traditional family backgrounds show lower levels of well-being and resilience.  • Measures to promote well-being and resilience should address social inequalities at the individual level and consider school-related contextual factors.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -