Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPain

Advancing equitable pain care worldwide requires progress in low- and middle-income settings: priorities for practice, research, and policy

  • Saurab Sharma1,2,3,4,5
5 affiliations
  1. 1Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  2. 2Pain Management and Research Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  3. 3School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  4. 4Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
  5. 5Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal University, Manipal, India
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Equitable, high-value pain care remains out of reach for many populations worldwide, particularly for people living in low- and middle-income countries and cultural minority groups in high-income settings. Despite carrying a disproportionate burden of chronic pain, these populations remain underrepresented in high-quality pain research, underserved by existing health systems, and constrained by social, political, environmental, and commercial determinants of health. The lack of locally generated evidence forces clinicians and policymakers to rely on externally produced research that may not translate to local cultural, linguistic, or health-system contexts. This invited viewpoint synthesizes key contributors to pain inequity—including limited prioritization of chronic pain in low- and middle-income countries, underdeveloped rehabilitation capacity, poor access to essential treatments, commercial exploitation, and misalignment between culturally shaped pain beliefs and Western-derived assessment and treatment models. I highlight opportunities to strengthen equity in clinical care through improved education of health professionals and the public, culturally and linguistically responsive assessment, and contextually adapted self-management and treatment strategies. Equitable research requires standardized collection of sociodemographic variables, deliberate inclusion of underrepresented groups, and global partnerships that avoid colonizing practices. I propose principles for fair and impactful North–South collaborations focused on co-creation of research agendas, shared leadership, sustainable capacity building, and transparent governance. Advancing equitable global pain care and research will require collective action from clinicians, researchers, institutions, policymakers, journals, funders, and communities. A coordinated shift toward culturally grounded, contextually adaptable, and ethically collaborative approaches is essential to meaningfully reduce global pain disparities and ensure all individuals benefit from scientific progress.

Related

  1. Progress and remaining priorities in geospatial analysis of health inequalities
    Peter M. Macharia, Nancy Fullman, Ezra Gayawan
    Communications MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineNatureCrossref
  2. Advancing Perioperative Medicine With AI: Current Landscape and Research Priorities.
    Nidhi Rohatgi, Piyush Mathur
    JMIR perioperative medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Worldwide Population Structure, Long-Term Demography, and Local Adaptation of Helicobacter pylori.
    Valeria Montano, Xavier Didelot, Matthieu Foll +5
    GeneticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text77 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaHAL
  4. Dissemination of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and carriage in the community worldwide: epidemiology, transmission pathways, molecular insights, and practical aspects
    Anne‐Lise Beaumont, Maxime Danjean, Hervé Jacquier +5
    Clinical Microbiology ReviewsPeer-reviewedLicence not stated6 citedGeneral medicineOpenAlex
  5. 2022 WHO estimates for overall and human papillomavirus test-based cervical cancer screening coverage worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis
    Beatriz Serrano, Esther Roura, Laia Alemany +10
    The Lancet Global HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 3.0-IGOEpidemiology & public healthCrossref

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{sharma2026advancing,
  title = {{Advancing equitable pain care worldwide requires progress in low- and middle-income settings: priorities for practice, research, and policy}},
  author = {Saurab Sharma},
  journal = {Pain},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000004130},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13714765},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Advancing equitable pain care worldwide requires progress in low- and middle-income settings: priorities for practice, research, and policy
AU  - Saurab Sharma
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - Pain
DO  - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000004130
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13714765
AB  - Equitable, high-value pain care remains out of reach for many populations worldwide, particularly for people living in low- and middle-income countries and cultural minority groups in high-income settings. Despite carrying a disproportionate burden of chronic pain, these populations remain underrepresented in high-quality pain research, underserved by existing health systems, and constrained by social, political, environmental, and commercial determinants of health. The lack of locally generated evidence forces clinicians and policymakers to rely on externally produced research that may not translate to local cultural, linguistic, or health-system contexts. This invited viewpoint synthesizes key contributors to pain inequity—including limited prioritization of chronic pain in low- and middle-income countries, underdeveloped rehabilitation capacity, poor access to essential treatments, commercial exploitation, and misalignment between culturally shaped pain beliefs and Western-derived assessment and treatment models. I highlight opportunities to strengthen equity in clinical care through improved education of health professionals and the public, culturally and linguistically responsive assessment, and contextually adapted self-management and treatment strategies. Equitable research requires standardized collection of sociodemographic variables, deliberate inclusion of underrepresented groups, and global partnerships that avoid colonizing practices. I propose principles for fair and impactful North–South collaborations focused on co-creation of research agendas, shared leadership, sustainable capacity building, and transparent governance. Advancing equitable global pain care and research will require collective action from clinicians, researchers, institutions, policymakers, journals, funders, and communities. A coordinated shift toward culturally grounded, contextually adaptable, and ethically collaborative approaches is essential to meaningfully reduce global pain disparities and ensure all individuals benefit from scientific progress.
SN  - 0304-3959
SN  - 1872-6623
ER  -