Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMJ Open

Community health and well-being workers (CHWWs) for preventive healthcare services uptake in the UK: a cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol

8 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
  2. 2Dental Public Health Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  3. 3University of West London, London, UK
  4. 4School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
  5. 5The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  6. 6Imperial College London, London, UK
  7. 7Faculty of Medicine and Health, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  8. 8Statistics Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Introduction Recognised within the National Health Service (NHS) 10-year plan as an innovative workforce solution to enable the left shift care towards integrated, neighbourhood models, community health and well-being workers (CHWWs) are rapidly expanding across England. Inspired by Brazil’s Family Health Strategy, the model has scaled from an initial pilot in Westminster to over 28 localities. However, despite this national expansion, robust empirical evidence of its impact remains limited. This protocol describes a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in Westminster designed to provide definitive evidence on whether embedding CHWWs within local communities effectively improves the uptake of preventive healthcare services.Methods and analysis A pragmatic, parallel-group, superiority cluster-randomised controlled trial is being conducted using routinely collected electronic health records. 60 geographically defined ‘village’ clusters (approximately 120 households in each cluster, 7200 households in total) located in socioeconomically deprived areas of Westminster, London, were randomised (1:2 allocation ratio) to either the intervention or control group. The intervention involves locally recruited CHWWs conducting comprehensive, proactive monthly household visits to promote preventive care and address social determinants of health between January 2024 and December 2025. The control group receives usual care. The primary outcome is the Composite Referral Completion Indicator (CRCI), defined as the household-level rate of completed eligible preventive healthcare services per person-year (including immunisations, cancer screenings and NHS Health Checks). Secondary outcomes include individual preventive service uptake and healthcare utilisation metrics (eg, general practice and accident and emergency attendances). Outcomes will be extracted from the Whole Systems Integrated Care (WSIC) database. Primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle using generalised linear mixed models, supplemented by hierarchical targeted maximum likelihood estimation for absolute effects.Ethics and dissemination The study relies on de-identified, routinely collected data to evaluate a new routine primary care service. Individual informed consent was waived because the use of retrospective routinely collected data for analysis fell under the existing global ethics agreement for the WSIC database (REC reference: REC18/WM/0323/IRAS252449). Nevertheless, the study was reviewed and approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA 23/HRA/4972; 20 December 2023). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed academic publications, conference presentations and plain-language summaries shared with the local community.Trial registration number NCT06144580.

Related

  1. Assessing an educational strategy to improve community health provider-led provision of cervical cancer screening services in western Kenya: A secondary analysis of the Elimisha-HPV cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Purity Chepkoech, Stephanie B. Jordan, Breandan Makhulo +5
    Global Health & MedicinePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  2. Standardised procalcitonin monitoring and antibiotic duration in community-acquired sepsis: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
    Thien Meensuk, Natthakit Chavapradit
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Protocol for the Nutrition OUtReach In Systems of Healthcare (NOURISH) trial: a phase II multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial of medically tailored groceries to prevent malnutrition in transplant and cellular therapy patients
    Madison Kurth, Asuka Suzuki, Jamie S Myers +16
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Experiential teaching centered on science popularisation videos: a randomised controlled trial on the impact on learning outcomes and core competencies of dental preventive medicine students
    Qingzong Si, Siqi Li, Lulu Cai +4
    BMC Medical EducationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  5. Shifting healthcare services from hospitals to community settings: implications for health inequalities – a systematic scoping review
    Amber Sacre, Adam Todd, Alisha Gupta +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{gadi2026community,
  title = {{Community health and well-being workers (CHWWs) for preventive healthcare services uptake in the UK: a cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol}},
  author = {Rawan Gadi and Cornelia Junghans Minton and Ahmad Alkhatib and Thomas Woodcock and David Peiris and Otavio Berwanger and Laurent Billot and Matthew Harris},
  journal = {BMJ Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-124582},
  url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-124582},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Community health and well-being workers (CHWWs) for preventive healthcare services uptake in the UK: a cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol
AU  - Rawan Gadi
AU  - Cornelia Junghans Minton
AU  - Ahmad Alkhatib
AU  - Thomas Woodcock
AU  - David Peiris
AU  - Otavio Berwanger
AU  - Laurent Billot
AU  - Matthew Harris
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - BMJ Open
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-124582
UR  - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-124582
AB  - Introduction Recognised within the National Health Service (NHS) 10-year plan as an innovative workforce solution to enable the left shift care towards integrated, neighbourhood models, community health and well-being workers (CHWWs) are rapidly expanding across England. Inspired by Brazil’s Family Health Strategy, the model has scaled from an initial pilot in Westminster to over 28 localities. However, despite this national expansion, robust empirical evidence of its impact remains limited. This protocol describes a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in Westminster designed to provide definitive evidence on whether embedding CHWWs within local communities effectively improves the uptake of preventive healthcare services.Methods and analysis A pragmatic, parallel-group, superiority cluster-randomised controlled trial is being conducted using routinely collected electronic health records. 60 geographically defined ‘village’ clusters (approximately 120 households in each cluster, 7200 households in total) located in socioeconomically deprived areas of Westminster, London, were randomised (1:2 allocation ratio) to either the intervention or control group. The intervention involves locally recruited CHWWs conducting comprehensive, proactive monthly household visits to promote preventive care and address social determinants of health between January 2024 and December 2025. The control group receives usual care. The primary outcome is the Composite Referral Completion Indicator (CRCI), defined as the household-level rate of completed eligible preventive healthcare services per person-year (including immunisations, cancer screenings and NHS Health Checks). Secondary outcomes include individual preventive service uptake and healthcare utilisation metrics (eg, general practice and accident and emergency attendances). Outcomes will be extracted from the Whole Systems Integrated Care (WSIC) database. Primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle using generalised linear mixed models, supplemented by hierarchical targeted maximum likelihood estimation for absolute effects.Ethics and dissemination The study relies on de-identified, routinely collected data to evaluate a new routine primary care service. Individual informed consent was waived because the use of retrospective routinely collected data for analysis fell under the existing global ethics agreement for the WSIC database (REC reference: REC18/WM/0323/IRAS252449). Nevertheless, the study was reviewed and approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA 23/HRA/4972; 20 December 2023). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed academic publications, conference presentations and plain-language summaries shared with the local community.Trial registration number NCT06144580.
SN  - 2044-6055
SN  - 2044-6055
ER  -