“They’re just shifting a problem”: A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the welfare implications of UK rescue dog importation
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 2School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 3VetPartners, York, United Kingdom
- 4Deanery of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Abstract
The number of rescue dogs being imported into the UK has increased significantly in recent years but research into the welfare implications of this practice is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate various stakeholder and owner experiences of behavioural and health problems in imported rescue dogs. Thirty interviews and four focus groups (totalling n = 54) were conducted with overseas and UK rescue representatives, trainers, transporters, veterinary surgeons, animal health officers, government representatives and dog fosterers and owners in the UK. In addition, eighteen online publicly available forum threads were selected using purposive sampling. Inductive coding of these data employing thematic analysis resulted in seven main themes. Related to health and behaviour the themes identified were: unfit for transport, welfare during transport, infectious disease, novelty, agency, and caregiver expectations. The final theme related to regulation and enforcement challenges with sub themes around: non-compliance, lack of resources, communication, jurisdiction and lack of cross-sector regulation. Overall, caregiver expectations often did not align with reality after the dog arrived, leading to costly surprises for new owners. Further, some dogs were felt to be not well-matched for the household and displayed challenging behaviours. The rescue organisation was perceived to have moral responsibilities to provide accurate information and pre-and post-adoption support, but this was felt to be inconsistently provided. Stakeholders perceive a number of health and behavioural welfare issues associated with importing rescue dogs, but preventing these is somewhat difficult due to the challenges in regulating and monitoring animal movements between countries. Greater education about expectations of imported rescue dog health and behaviour is recommended, alongside improved monitoring of rescue organisation and transport processes, in order to protect animal welfare.
Related
- Hidden infections: Linking parasite ecology, fish health and stakeholder perceptions in Nile tilapia aquaculture in central Kenya
- Stakeholder perceptions of antimicrobial resistance governance in livestock production: a cross-sectional study from North-Central Nigeria.
- Lived multifunctionality: Indigenous perceptions of shifting cultivation landscapes in the Naga Hills of Myanmar
- Parent and stakeholder perspectives on a school-based food programme supporting diverse communities in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study
- Divergent stakeholder perspectives on antimicrobial resistance and One Health in Ghana: a qualitative study
BibTeX
@article{wallis2026theyre,
title = {{“They’re just shifting a problem”: A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the welfare implications of UK rescue dog importation}},
author = {Lisa J. Wallis and Alisha Murphy and Gina Pinchbeck and Jenny Stavisky and Louise Buckley and Carri Westgarth},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0343416},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343416},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - “They’re just shifting a problem”: A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the welfare implications of UK rescue dog importation
AU - Lisa J. Wallis
AU - Alisha Murphy
AU - Gina Pinchbeck
AU - Jenny Stavisky
AU - Louise Buckley
AU - Carri Westgarth
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/09
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0343416
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343416
AB - The number of rescue dogs being imported into the UK has increased significantly in recent years but research into the welfare implications of this practice is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate various stakeholder and owner experiences of behavioural and health problems in imported rescue dogs. Thirty interviews and four focus groups (totalling n = 54) were conducted with overseas and UK rescue representatives, trainers, transporters, veterinary surgeons, animal health officers, government representatives and dog fosterers and owners in the UK. In addition, eighteen online publicly available forum threads were selected using purposive sampling. Inductive coding of these data employing thematic analysis resulted in seven main themes. Related to health and behaviour the themes identified were: unfit for transport, welfare during transport, infectious disease, novelty, agency, and caregiver expectations. The final theme related to regulation and enforcement challenges with sub themes around: non-compliance, lack of resources, communication, jurisdiction and lack of cross-sector regulation. Overall, caregiver expectations often did not align with reality after the dog arrived, leading to costly surprises for new owners. Further, some dogs were felt to be not well-matched for the household and displayed challenging behaviours. The rescue organisation was perceived to have moral responsibilities to provide accurate information and pre-and post-adoption support, but this was felt to be inconsistently provided. Stakeholders perceive a number of health and behavioural welfare issues associated with importing rescue dogs, but preventing these is somewhat difficult due to the challenges in regulating and monitoring animal movements between countries. Greater education about expectations of imported rescue dog health and behaviour is recommended, alongside improved monitoring of rescue organisation and transport processes, in order to protect animal welfare.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -